Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1421. Thoughts on respecs, n the state of the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Valmorgan Aubaris wrote: Well, you said it yourself, there needs to be a grand goal, and there already is, the connection to EVE alliances, if they don't set this connection PRIORITY ONE this game will fade, and fast. 1. Base mercs at thier c...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 23:02:00
|
1422. Thoughts on respecs, n the state of the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Posted this as a reply in another topic, figured I would give it a home of it own though. Hey, those FOTM users pointed out balance issues with weapons and Mods. They don't hurt the game any more than you...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 23:00:00
|
1423. Thoughts on respecs, n the state of the game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Posted this as a reply in another topic, figured I would give it a home of it own though. Hey, those FOTM users pointed out balance issues with weapons and Mods. They don't hurt the game any more than you hurt the game. They are playing a "game"....
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 22:33:00
|
1424. Leaked video of CCP Wolfman - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Righteous Rage wrote: Free Beers wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Enjoy your ban, for not only tarnishing the name of one of CCP's greatest assets, but also using this prestigious forum for RageBlogs Or i could just post what...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 22:05:00
|
1425. Deployment "Successful" - in General Discussions [original thread]
AHAHAH, Love the thumbs up at the end. I've had that thing glitch with my tanks for a very long time. To the point that I was BEGGING somebody to just blow it up so I can play the game already!
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 22:02:00
|
1426. Respecs are STUPID - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Bethhy wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Bethhy wrote: Ever wonder why we had Cal Logi's everywhere.., Hint, it involved respec's. ;) We would have had them anyways, it just would have taken a little longer....
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 21:56:00
|
1427. Respecs are STUPID - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: With all the suits out, it's almost like actually being out of beta. A fresh start for people using gear they were forced to use, not chose because it was OP, is quite fair. A fresh start for people using gear they ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 14:42:00
|
1428. Respecs are STUPID - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Put me firmly in the no respec crowd, can't even guess as to how many times I said on these forums, go shove your core flaylock up your cal logis a$$, you don't get a respec. They hurt the game, they are contrary to the...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.08 14:34:00
|
1429. So if MLT tanks get nerfed, doesn't that just mean we will see STD tank spam? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talryn Vilneram wrote: I'm not mega rich so if I lose one or two STD tanks (they are fit with Basic and enhanced gear) I swap to Militia tanks. So no I dont think so. Most people play with ISk efficiency in mind. Isk efficiency, what's that...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.07 20:35:00
|
1430. Tankers and your fits - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just curious how everyone runs their tanks. The further into 1.7 we get, the more my variety of fits shrinks and shrinks. I run the gunnlogi, and that alone. So I'm very curious about Maddie fits. So my go to fit, I use a missile, blaster, and a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.07 20:29:00
|
1431. I was just shot by a Thale's.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: 2194 damage, is it supposed to do that much damage? I mean even with head shot, proficiency and damage mods that seems like a lot. **** man, that's like getting hit by a railgun.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.07 13:09:00
|
1432. Surface Infrastructure practicality - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: CCP when you guys desighed these SI what were their intended purpose? they look cool and stuff but they just dont feel like they serve any prupose other than a place to fight. the interior spaces dont look li...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.07 13:00:00
|
1433. Blame the tanker - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alabastor 'TheBlaster' Alcar wrote: daishi mk03 wrote: Thanks to your thread I now realized that 99,9999% of all thread here (including yours) are absolutely useless, wrong and bullsh't. Finally, though I was only wrong about the number. I ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.07 12:52:00
|
1434. I used to kill tanks - now I AM the tank (honeyed lamb inside) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Woot, well written post. CCP better have read this!!
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 19:10:00
|
1435. Red-line Railgun Tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Everything Dies wrote: Foxhound Elite wrote: Let's please brainstorm together to get some ideas going on how to remove their ability to 'kill-and-not-be-killed' apart from an organised squadron of assault dropship pilots. Umm...if you c...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 18:55:00
|
1436. Red-line Railgun Tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: ..snip.. Read it. All of it. Still looking for some short answer to the real question. You still call it a tactic in your last post. Its an abuse not a tactic. Also the "no honour in killing" waf...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 18:36:00
|
1437. Red-line Railgun Tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foxhound Elite wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Ok, from my tankin perspective.....sniped out all the twaddle... Long post, but you keep trying to call being inaccessible a 'skilled use of tactics' I...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 17:47:00
|
1438. Tank's ammo needs to be more limited - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daxxis KANNAH wrote: I thought there were supply depots at base spawn points that tanks could get to easy. - I have seen tankers speeding back to them after blowing up ones in the field Now if you are crying about placement in ambush matches...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 17:34:00
|
1439. Tank's ammo needs to be more limited - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Taka, depots are very stupid sometimes. Often I'm hugging it as infantry and yet it won't work. You're not the only one with these pr...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 17:33:00
|
1440. Red-line Railgun Tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Judge Rhadamanthus wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Ok, from my tankin perspective.....sniped out all the twaddle... Long post, but you keep trying to call being inaccessible a 'skilled use of tactics' I call BS on this. This is not a real world b...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.06 17:15:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |