| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
4341. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Its because of the percieved skill set diffrence. At its core an Awsome Vehicle guy buys part of his awsomeness with his vehicle that makes him 90% resilient against anything on the map, coupled to at least having some tac...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:42:00
|
4342. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Tankers on the other hand, require dedicated AV, which often puts the infantry player using it at a great disadvantage to the other 15 people in the match that aren't using tanks (but are in fact specifically hunting...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:39:00
|
4343. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: For all those shouting the COD card. Use BF. they got the vehicle to infantry down right. or planet side. or halo. or unreal. or arma. but those HAV don't last long enough to draw a fart? no ****, cause THEY ARE FPS GAMES. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:34:00
|
4344. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Have proto AV readily available? Ok, I'll make sure to pack my merc's backpack with all the necessary weapons just in case a tanker decides to drop his load. I have PRO AV myself. Forge guns, and the pathetically eas...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:32:00
|
4345. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Another round of QQ from tankers Suck it up bitches I'm still waiting for you to take up my offer to show me how you drive a tank.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:26:00
|
4346. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: SgtDoughnut wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: man... this community cant do anything right. I ask "why arent tanks allowed to be seccessful but infaintry is?" and everyone answers with other complants...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 06:24:00
|
4347. Day of 1.5, tanker meeting in 'Honey Badger' - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Zero Harpuia wrote: If every single tanker in the game does this, they'll either end up on the same side and get borked by the vehicle limiters, or end up on opposite sides and tear each other to shreds. If the former, o...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 05:10:00
|
4348. Day of 1.5, tanker meeting in 'Honey Badger' - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: If every single tanker in the game does this, they'll either end up on the same side and get borked by the vehicle limiters, or end up on opposite sides and tear each other to shreds. If the former, oh well. If the latter, t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 05:08:00
|
4349. Waiting for 1.5 is worse than Christmas - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll give my future first born for early patch notes.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:58:00
|
4350. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this phenomena happen? Also, wasent attacking the AR assa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:41:00
|
4351. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So for you, it just isn't satisfactory to merely suppress us and drive us away, you want it to be so incredibly easy to destroy tanks that you don't need to reload your Haywires to do it. That just ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:39:00
|
4352. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: man... this community cant do anything right. I ask "why arent tanks allowed to be seccessful but infaintry is?" and everyone answers with other complants about tanks. sucks Your answer is right the...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:37:00
|
4353. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: Beck Weathers wrote: I too saved up SP on a charicter got an advanced fit tank and killed everyone in a academy pub mach, and you all should base all your tank bias off that experiance... or not belive a word they say beca...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:33:00
|
4354. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtDoughnut wrote: You want to truly balance a tank, then make it where the driver is only a driver, he still needs a gunner for even his main gun. Fine When you accept the scanner in the light weapon slot.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:28:00
|
4355. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: And I think it's safe to say that you aren't going to be seeing a lot of small turrets on HAV's after 1.5 drops. Screw that noise. Anyone wanting to ride around in a tank can build their own. Parasites. HEAR HEAR! ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:27:00
|
4356. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: yeah he had less. If anything, that should be even more problematic than a tank doing it, the infaintry player obviously did not need 6k HP or performance boosting mods to kill 3 ppl but thats okay...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:24:00
|
4357. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: An immortal tank. Feels balanced. LOL Relax, Every single module is going to go towards maximizing resistence and health. The tradeoff will be greatly lessened killing power. I'm litera...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:12:00
|
4358. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: ...As it stands now Team Kong, consisting of the likes of CCP Wolfman and CCP Remnant are in charge of everything you touch on the battlefield from your controllers t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:09:00
|
4359. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''I know it's frustrating to see a tanker go 25+ kills per match for 5-10 matches (suspect hyperbole) but thats what it takes for tankers to make a profit, dead serious a good fit runs a mill + a contract pays out 250 for ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:06:00
|
4360. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''yikes. Every tanker who plays the tank will say the opposite with 100% of shield tankers crying after they read your statement :( but i respect your opinion'' Exactly , people will ALWAYS whine ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.09.16 04:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |