| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
3641. Who do you hate more, Redline snipers or AFKers? Vote! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anelfucacicus
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 08:06:00
|
3642. I suck at shooters :( - in Rookie Training Grounds [original thread]
It's currently at 20-20. I've been changing it a lot lately, but I suck with most of them.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 07:55:00
|
3643. I suck at shooters :( - in Rookie Training Grounds [original thread]
lol, I want to work on my gun game though.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 07:35:00
|
3644. I suck at shooters :( - in Rookie Training Grounds [original thread]
I don't know why, but my aim is just terrible. I've tried turning Aim assist on/off, but I can't tell the difference. Even if I get the jump on a red, I'll usually screw up and get killed Any tips?
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 07:27:00
|
3645. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Tex Mex Aztec wrote: Tangents, man, tangents. yes I'll admit you got me but let's go back to the fact the free LAVs break the rule that if you die you lose it so why shouldn't that go for the LAVs I could use starter ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:35:00
|
3646. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 2. uhh no never. 3. that's a single negative last i checked 1 /= 2 Surviving = not going boom. two negatives don't automatically multiply Anyway, I don't give a **** As for 2. I ask my teacher if I can go to the ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:23:00
|
3647. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 3. "And surviving isn't enough of an incentive?" 2. uhh no never. 3. that's a single negative last i checked 1 /= 2 Surviving = not going boom. two negatives don't automatically multiply Anyway, I don't give a ****
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:17:00
|
3648. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: And not instantly going boom isn't enough of an incentive? Yes it was a double negative But double negatives are acceptable when they are needed to emphasize something "And surviving isn't ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 05:08:00
|
3649. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
That wasn't a double negative.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:57:00
|
3650. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Sinboto Simmons wrote: who says I don't jump out? They blow up if left alone after a while, and according to Jax they should not be disposable. and all vehicles have that blow up thing even t...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:52:00
|
3651. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: A dedicated driver also wouldn't be using the free one in the first place We won't ever have dedicated drivers if there is no need to protect a free vehicle And not instantly going boom isn't enough o...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:50:00
|
3652. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: who says I don't jump out? They blow up if left alone after a while, and according to Jax they should not be disposable.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:46:00
|
3653. HMG needs a OVERHAUL ASAP - in General Discussions [original thread]
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote: semperfi1999 wrote: I would like to note that the only issue I have with the HMG is the range. Their effective range is the same if not greater then the ARs. HMG should be deadly but right now it's a little too ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:44:00
|
3654. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: what's to say that a dedicated LAV driver won't stay with his LAV The fact that they go boom so easily, that's why they need a buff. A dedicated driver also wouldn't be using the free one in the first place, you're only ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:39:00
|
3655. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: I generally use them as transport/evac for my squad getting them where they need to go and should it be too hot GTFO as well as the gunner sprays plasma at the hostiles. good times have been had doing that Yeah, but ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:32:00
|
3656. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone. Hmm I believe we have gotten off ...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:20:00
|
3657. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone. Hmm I believe we have gotten off topic... but nonetheless why should we bot...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:09:00
|
3658. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
YES You should have the option to lock your vehicle, but you run the risk of someone destroying/hacking it while you're gone.
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 04:03:00
|
3659. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: 2. Same with tanks and dropships! It should extend to them too!
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:57:00
|
3660. An issue with free LAVs - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Almost every dropship pilot would disagree. with... need details okay? Sloth9230 wrote: Jax Saurian wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: There should also be a way to lock vehicles so no one steal t...
- by Sloth9230 - at 2013.02.28 03:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |