| Pages: [1] |
1. BALANCING ISSUES - The Rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: ScR is broken because it is better @ CQC then the AR. Don't get me started on the amarr bonus. RR should be semi auto and require pacing. <3 CR AR is meh why bother ^ Above is based on PC experience How would you make th...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.20 03:42:00
|
2. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Six 7 wrote: "Push Back" I don't expect to kill a tankGǪ Im using tanker logic, using av as a deterrent and tanks being the killers. Read If that was even logical, then wouldn't we have to re-tittle the descriptions for FGs/...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 13:07:00
|
3. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Six 7 wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: being insible 400 m away IS a crutch.... just like when the invisable shotgunners ran pampant You say that as if every SL user was ...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:59:00
|
4. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: being insible 400 m away IS a crutch.... just like when the invisable shotgunners ran pampant You say that as if every SL user was always 400m away. Majority were 400m away...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:53:00
|
5. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: Six 7 wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Six 7 wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: the AV problem is that infantry AV are still behaving like they are invisable to tanks! they spent 6 months with complete invisability to ...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:40:00
|
6. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Six 7 wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: the AV problem is that infantry AV are still behaving like they are invisable to tanks! they spent 6 months with complete invisability to tanks, able to alpha them without tanks ...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:32:00
|
7. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
I read it, and agreed with it. Just voicing my opinion. Not trying to be a **** just trying to find a solution to a problem.
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:24:00
|
8. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Izlare Lenix wrote: pegasis prime wrote: dude if I had remote reps on my gunlogi I don't think there would be any thing that could stop me apart from an evenly machete tank and pilot crew. I have asked for severall fixes to the mlt tank sp...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:21:00
|
9. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: you meantioned pre 1.7 balance without mentioning that all infantry was invisable outside the 50m mark. alowing AV infantry to just stand in open spaces spamming without any danger whatsoever, and without the tank knowing...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 12:09:00
|
10. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: the AV problem is that infantry AV are still behaving like they are invisable to tanks! they spent 6 months with complete invisability to tanks, able to alpha them without tanks having the ability to even know where shots ...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:59:00
|
11. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: as much as you made some valuable points about HAVs , there were so many flaws in your arguments about HAVs . You like so many others pointed out that tanks were viable in 1.6 if you utilised team work how ever no matt...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:50:00
|
12. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Izlare Lenix wrote: I think tanks and AV would be perfectly balanced right now if tanks cost about 4x as much. Quadruple the price and people won't be inclined to keep spamming tank after tank because one tank loss and u...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:38:00
|
13. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
R F Gyro wrote: Six 7 wrote: Tanks shouldn't be paper, nor should AV KO a smart tanker. Things are simply imbalanced. Proto AV can barely scratch militia tanks, making every level below pointless. Since both true tankers and AV have had thei...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:22:00
|
14. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Izlare Lenix wrote: I think tanks and AV would be perfectly balanced right now if tanks cost about 4x as much. Quadruple the price and people won't be inclined to keep spamming tank after tank because one tank loss and u probably break even for...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:16:00
|
15. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justicar Karnellia wrote: Good post. Detailed arguments supported with facts illustrating this uncomfortable gaming dynamic that has crept in. I think it's pretty clear now there's a problem - I think we're just waiting for some kind of CCP act...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:11:00
|
16. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leithe Askarii wrote: I liked tanking mechanics back in 1.6, felt like the tanks had more weight..... but in many ways the tanks needed a bit of a buff and some reformatting, this 1.7 is a bit intense but that will slowly balance out over time....
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 11:00:00
|
17. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yea, so what I have to say involves tanksGǪ figures right? Tanks in 1.6 were viable given teamwork. You Had remote reps on LAVS, HAVS, and Dropships. Spider Tanking or LAV/ Tank spider was viable. YET no tanks I ever saw chose to use teamwork ap...
- by Six 7 - at 2013.12.19 10:46:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |