| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 |
1781. New quafe vehicle. - in General Discussions [original thread]
To be Fair I said in the beginning that I wanted to buy a Stand alone BPO LAV, Arkena and Cat Merc did as well.
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.28 06:52:00
|
1782. Anyone remember this pathetic thread lol - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yeah, when Rattati changed he changed everything but I did stop playing for about two or three months. I don't however play anywhere near like I used to and I fear that with Metal Gear Online Comming on (whenever it will) it will be the deathstr...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.28 06:46:00
|
1783. CCP Logic, vehicles. || Passive & Active repairs idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
There are some things I understand at least why they tried to change them. The shield booster and armor reppers is not among one of them. It seems like they were changing things just for the **** of it.
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 19:29:00
|
1784. CCP Logic, vehicles. || Passive & Active repairs idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Old tanks worked much better for the waves of opportunity thing. I remember that once they activated their modules, they could take a ridiculous amount of beating (Assuming a very high SP tanker), but once they were down, they ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 18:40:00
|
1785. CCP Logic, vehicles. || Passive & Active repairs idea. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
>Wants to make vehicles with "waves of opportunity" >Turns Armor Repairs into passive boosters loLogic. When the vehicle pass comes, hopefully in the next update, can we have Armor Repair modules that behaved how they used to? It was ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 18:25:00
|
1786. Is anyone else kind of underwhelmed by Warlords 1.0? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Zaria Min Deir wrote: Bethhy wrote: Biggest **** off for me is... Improved User experience : Has nothing to do with improving game performance. Improved Visuals : Has nothing to do with improving game performance. ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 18:00:00
|
1787. Faction Warfare BPOs - in General Discussions [original thread]
To be Fair they are only Corporate Factions, not and empire faction. Roden, Allotek, Duvolle and Creodron may be Gallente Factions but they are not the Federal Navy i.e. the Gallente's Military themselves. Federal Navy Ships tend to be the in...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 17:35:00
|
1788. Is anyone else kind of underwhelmed by Warlords 1.0? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Biggest **** off for me is... Improved User experience : Has nothing to do with improving game performance. Improved Visuals : Has nothing to do with improving game performance. So we are getting more fluff added onto the game...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 17:19:00
|
1789. [Petition] Apex Dropsuits Multi-Fit - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hey if i got the faction Spartan assault could I only put Loyalty point modules on the suits as well as BPOs? Sure it may be a tad OP but I'm reduced to the Federal Marines (or x faction) and BPO items . Either that or I want a different color...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 15:18:00
|
1790. Warlords Hype? - in General Discussions [original thread]
My warbarge has blackjack and hookers
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 15:07:00
|
1791. @Rattati:Will we be getting a respec when vehicles are reintroduced? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have most SP in the small blaster and Incubus. Terrible, terrible things
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 15:05:00
|
1792. Free $5 worth of Aurum - in General Discussions [original thread]
LUGMOS wrote: Aeon Amadi wrote: LUGMOS wrote: What got you mad? Or you can't want to talk about it? I'll understand if you don't. It hurts sometimes... Eh, this dude was talking thrash about one of my friends because of the make-up she...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 07:48:00
|
1793. Free $5 worth of Aurum - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: Thanks for the AUR boyo! :D Yeah, you would get it, Kirk Your standings with the Federation have increased!
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 06:54:00
|
1794. Free $5 worth of Aurum - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thanks for the AUR boyo! :D
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 06:48:00
|
1795. Attention Enemies of the Federation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Helghus Resther wrote: sir RAVEN WING wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: A reminder to any who would dare oppose the Federation. They must enjoy watching their mercenaries get shot. Maybe they hate their job and pretend each Gallente suit ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 04:22:00
|
1796. Yo dog why is the assault rifle not the plasma rifle yet yo - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yo dawg I heard you like Assault Rifles!
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.27 04:20:00
|
1797. I CAN NOT BELIEVE YOU CCP, SERIOUSLY?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
deezy dabest wrote: Bright Cloud wrote: OP is a tard for spending that much money on this game. As long as he feels like he is getting his money out of it then he is far from a tard. We should all thank OP for feeding CCPs ridiculous cash...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.26 16:37:00
|
1798. What is your vision of the Gallente Assault? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: For pubs a Precision Enhancer is also acceptable, but I don't see the appeal myself. I use a complex enhancer for PC matches, it comes in handy for detecting heavies. And with the Ion Pistol I can take quick shots at them. ...
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.26 16:34:00
|
1799. GRRRR!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: *Strokes his Gallentean epeen* There's an interesting fact about Cats epeen. Google it, you won't be disappointed.
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.26 08:18:00
|
1800. Tactical sniper rifle - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yeah, pretty sure Tac Snipers are pretty well used weapons.
- by Sgt Kirk - at 2015.01.26 03:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |