| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. You should be rewarded based on K/D - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghost Kaisar wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Ghost Kaisar wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: Pushing Charlie wrote: I do know best, I've been playing this **** game since CB. You scrubs joined what? 2 days ago? Dust was released back in May ...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.07 03:34:00
|
62. I've hit my record of sniper hunter today. - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: Snipers should watch their six like anyone else. True but one can never truly prepare for a falling dropship and 4 guys following to make sure your dead..
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.06 07:51:00
|
63. You should be rewarded based on K/D - in General Discussions [original thread]
LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: RemingtonBeaver wrote: I think the important thing to remember is that I don't know who PushingCharlie is. I've never heard his name. I've never seen him in a PC battle. I've never heard of his corp. There is a ver...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.06 07:48:00
|
64. You should be rewarded based on K/D - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kensai Dragon wrote: Pushing Charlie wrote: I did back it up with hard evidence, you can't win a game based on WP or position on the board, simple as. They can be won through kills and lost through deaths. Actually, holding the objective...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.05 07:08:00
|
65. You should be rewarded based on K/D - in General Discussions [original thread]
postapo wastelander wrote: Spademan wrote: There's some compelling points in this argument. Logi's just get in the way and just take up space on the team. Nanohives? Why would I want to resupply? I'm busy killing Uplinks? Are you mad ...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.05 07:02:00
|
66. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Breach has a base charge of 6 seconds. basic 4 assault 3. Gastun's: 2.5 seconds per shot so at level 5 you get... Breach: 4.5 seconds per shot Regular: 3 seconds per shot Assault: 2.25 seconds per shot. Gastun's: 1....
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.04 18:32:00
|
67. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: i know that and i also said that the forge shot is bigger than rail shots so it makes sense that that is what theire reticle si and the same thing happens to rails and forges dont overheat so anyway who the **** ...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.04 18:29:00
|
68. Playing for fun? - in General Discussions [original thread]
FraggerMike wrote: ...which distracts them from someone serious in the battle. So I do help out. Lol I snipe on the red's redline almost every game and I pick on the OP squads or certain rival or even some red that's been taking me too light...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.04 16:51:00
|
69. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: even though thay made no sense what so ever just some butthurt scrub ranting because his op weapon will only get points for kills. If they take away ...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.04 16:32:00
|
70. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: even though thay made no sense what so ever just some butthurt scrub ranting because his op weapon will only get points for kills. If they take away the damage then anti tankers wont get damage points either so wtf...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.04 15:12:00
|
71. It Kind of Seems Like Precision Is A Joke Now - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ahkhomi Cypher wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: Ahkhomi Cypher wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: So it sorta balances out at the end, yes? Also with 2 damps on a gal wouldn't that be just right for the amarr to see a damped Ga...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 06:47:00
|
72. CCP scout balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher only if that were true most gal scout can see 75-90% of scouts and have 2 dampne...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:55:00
|
73. CCP scout balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher only if that were true most gal scout can see 75-90% of scouts and have 2 dampners and ferro plates with a proto cloak so they can see a lo...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:31:00
|
74. CCP Scout Bonuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: Maken Tosch wrote: The Amarr scout seems more like my Myrmidon in Eve Online. You can tank it pretty good but it's meant to be used as bait from the looks of it. hmm... That's how it...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:28:00
|
75. CCP scout balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher only if that were true most gal scout can see 75-90% of scouts and have 2 dampners and ferro plates with a proto cloak so they can see a lot hide from all passive dropsuit scans and still have armor...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:20:00
|
76. CCP Scout Bonuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: The Amarr scout seems more like my Myrmidon in Eve Online. You can tank it pretty good but it's meant to be used as bait from the looks of it. hmm... That's how it is? I mean it does match slot wise to the Gal scout.
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:06:00
|
77. CCP Scout Bonuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: jace silencerww wrote: Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: I personally think the scouts' bonuses are outrageously all over the place. The Gal get's +2% to precision when It should be dampe...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 05:04:00
|
78. CCP Scout Bonuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Apocalyptic Destroyer wrote: I personally think the scouts' bonuses are outrageously all over the place. The Gal get's +2% to precision when It should be dampening while the Amarr gets a +5% precision ? I mean it's lik...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 04:52:00
|
79. CCP scout balance - in General Discussions [original thread]
jace silencerww wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: CUSE TOWN333 wrote: maluble wrote: jace silencerww wrote: i will curious to why Gal scout have both precision and damping? with both bonuses the Gal is by far the best scout. they...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 04:41:00
|
80. It Kind of Seems Like Precision Is A Joke Now - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ahkhomi Cypher wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: So it sorta balances out at the end, yes? Also with 2 damps on a gal wouldn't that be just right for the amarr to see a damped Gal without cloak? At 3 it should be around 13 while 2 is ...
- by Sclompton Face-Smasher - at 2014.10.03 04:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |