| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3521. Player-2-Player Trading is coming in February Guys - in General Discussions [original thread]
WARxion ForDUST wrote: 3x Officer Minmatar Assault] BEST PRICE! (it's actually a MLT) As amazing as contract scamming would be, I think the trade window will show exactly what you are giving/getting from the deal. Imagine station trading as it...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.10 14:23:00
|
3522. Is Dust becoming P2W now? - in General Discussions [original thread]
OP doesn't have a clue what P2W is P2W occurs when spending money on the game gives you a bonus that can't be earned via other means in game.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.10 04:03:00
|
3523. whats diffrent - in General Discussions [original thread]
Post something about it in the 1.10 tech support/bugs forum thread . Tell CCP the time you had your match.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 20:36:00
|
3524. Called it b!tches! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hakyou Brutor wrote: Heavies are OP, Flux Orbitals are being spammed, and from what I hear the lag is bad. You said heavies, when I think you meant HMG sentinels. Yeah, nothing really changed about them except the bandwidth changes so... they ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 20:28:00
|
3525. Logis Need a Speed Buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
King, what would you do if CCP offered to normalize logi run/walk speeds (not sprint) with assault, but you had to give up your Amarr logi sidearm?
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 20:08:00
|
3526. Squad Commission - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go here, tell CCP.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 20:05:00
|
3527. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: I suppose that the next step would be terms negotiation, which would be more appropriately handled outside of this thread. My in game moniker is Clone D. ... I'm not asking you to setup an in-game match I will be as blunt as p...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 19:57:00
|
3528. Who enjoyed the LP event? - in General Discussions [original thread]
It was meh. The moderately increased LP rewards were not worth it unless you already had above average standings with a faction.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 19:32:00
|
3529. CCP....Oh My.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: #Horny 27 year olds FTFY
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 19:27:00
|
3530. CCP....Oh My.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Her knees want to instant battle.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 19:14:00
|
3531. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: That would be a cool play mode I like it! It's been mentioned before, but I think a player matched mode would totally rule. Both team captains agree to a match and include any number of players up to 16 on their teams, without...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 19:10:00
|
3532. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luk Manag wrote: How about running a mix of plates and reps instead of a bunch of plates? With armor plates taking a nerf in Echo this makes more sense anyway.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 18:40:00
|
3533. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let's make a bet. My squad vs. Your badass. Side note: my squad can also be composed of badasses, they just happen to enjoy warbarge strikes, 20% more WP, and comms more than your lone badass. This is hypothetical. I don't claim to be a badass...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 18:31:00
|
3534. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Men, women, boys and girls who figure out how to do things with such potency that they effectively achieve single handedly what it would take a group of other people to do. These are good ways to waste my valuable clones, soldie...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 17:45:00
|
3535. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Some well endowed individuals are nearly as effective as an autonomous unit as an entire squad. Remember when they raised the cost of orbitals and a few individuals complained because they could no longer achieve an orbital alone...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 17:10:00
|
3536. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Demonsbane wrote: Scrub. I'm so good at getting killed I don't need the advantage of max skills. 2leet4me
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 16:55:00
|
3537. Age of the Repping Suits For Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Grimmiers wrote: Why can't we all just die like men/woman Dying is the one thing I can say I am really good at in this game. If dying required a skill I would have Dying Operation V, Dying Prof V.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 16:47:00
|
3538. Sentinels514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leadfoot10 wrote: Ripley, CCP decided Sentinels should be CQC masters -- check the description -- and they have been since day 1 of Dust. I hope you realize that me not taking your word for it, isn't personal If you have a direct quote fro...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 16:17:00
|
3539. Sentinels514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leadfoot10 wrote: They are the masters of CQC, they should rule in that range....and let's remember you have the choice to engage or not. When my option is to just sit on my ass while they have tea in the objective room or engage... no... I ha...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 16:09:00
|
3540. CCP why do you promote boosting/impossible challanges? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gentlemercs, Rattati has spoken... https://twitter.com/CCP_Rattati/status/542343369645490176 "I am almost 100% sure that mission was supposed to be "per day". Let's see tomorrow after the team reviews the issues."
- by Ripley Riley - at 2014.12.09 15:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |