| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. Reply to AE's Finest - in The War Room [original thread]
guys. my sexual appendage is feeling so funny right now. what do i do?
- by Rannici - at 2014.02.07 02:09:00
|
22. AE's finest - in The War Room [original thread]
(sigh). i get no love. and how is it possible to jack off too much?
- by Rannici - at 2014.02.07 01:42:00
|
23. so, this is new... - in General Discussions [original thread]
holy ****. Quote: you think 70-80k is expensive for a tank? OMG im done with the forums for this morning lmao. drugs....drugs....drugs i loved the comment. then i saw your name. i love you man. keep up the work. if you quit, i quit. just s...
- by Rannici - at 2014.01.24 16:14:00
|
24. so, this is new... - in General Discussions [original thread]
maybe because i've been playing only faction warfare till this week. (i lost my trackball, and thought i should step down the competition a notch) i stepped into normal skirmish, running cheap suits... and this, tank is dominating. madrugar, ou...
- by Rannici - at 2014.01.24 14:31:00
|
25. Amarr scout racial bonus parity problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
good research. expect an invite from ancient exiles aboard science vessel douchecunt.
- by Rannici - at 2014.01.20 19:08:00
|
26. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
god forbid i want a balanced and fun game to play. i'm pointing out ways to make it fair. pointing out, that right now, swarms are nearly useless, and tanks are god-mode. if nothing changes, you won't hear another word from me. i'll just be drivi...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:51:00
|
27. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
don't even get me started on LAVs.... it shouldn't take 5 wyrkomi volleys to kill the BPO saga. ever. this game is so broken it's ridiculous. stop being in denial.
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:23:00
|
28. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
i don't even care any more. WORLD OF TANKS 2.0. FINE BY ME. **** all ya'll.
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:21:00
|
29. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
nope. i'm seeing good players, exploit a broken game, and i'm rightfully getting pissed off about it.
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:18:00
|
30. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quote: killed a tank with a blaster turret today no problem. He didn't even know I was shooting him till he popped. I see no problem. well aren't you special? stupid, newberry tankers are not the ones i'm talking about. it's these overpow...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:14:00
|
31. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I SHOULD BE ABLE TO SOLO A TANK WITH SWARMS IF I CATCH IT OFF GUARD AND HAVE SUPERIOR FIELD POSITION! instead, they drive right at me, activate this bullshit invulnerability and pummel my face in with their protosuits. SO YES. I'M GOING TO *****...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:12:00
|
32. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
we have a good name? since when? you can go **** yourself? how about that, ****. **** you and your noob 'bullet cluster' corp telling me how to play.
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:06:00
|
33. INVULNERABLE TANKS. ARE YOU SERIOUS CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
is this a joke? you nerf AV, and then make these armor and shield hardeners godly. what i'm seeing in match after match is a new breed of tanker. tankers that are high in SP... so, they're running in relatively cheap madrugars fitted with harden...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.12 00:03:00
|
34. FRIENDLY FIRE 24 HOUR BAN, AGAINST A TANK? ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
uhh... proof? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x-Z6pW0eOVs
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 23:47:00
|
35. FRIENDLY FIRE 24 HOUR BAN, AGAINST A TANK? ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
PART 2. CALLED IN A TANK. BLUEBERRY GOT HIT BY IT FALLING BUT DIDN'T DIE. BOOTED. WHAT A WONDERFUL GAME YOU HAVE HERE CCP. 24 HOUR BAN? WHOSE BRIGHT IDEA WAS THAT? (LOOKING AT YOU JENZA)
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 16:47:00
|
36. So I win my first game in faction warfare... - in General Discussions [original thread]
i believe it's caused by having a negative standing with a faction at the end of the match. i could be wrong, but my very next game after adding my ps3 to the dmz i got the same error. then haven't seen it for a few games. of course, now i'm nega...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 16:45:00
|
37. So I win my first game in faction warfare... - in General Discussions [original thread]
just added my ps3 to my router's DMZ. thank you for that suggestion.
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 14:22:00
|
38. So I win my first game in faction warfare... - in General Discussions [original thread]
... and right when the after-battle report screen should show up, i get a black screen with the message, "A fatal error has occured. The game cannot continue. Please quit and restart the game." ARE YOU ******* KIDDING ME CCP?
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 14:06:00
|
39. FRIENDLY FIRE 24 HOUR BAN, AGAINST A TANK? ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quote: My suggestion for avoiding said things is practice a combat doctrine on the battlefield. you must be trolling.. no. i'm going to practice using a tank with an afterburner and run over any LAV i see, until CCP fixes their ass-backward...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 13:24:00
|
40. How bad is the FF in FW? - in General Discussions [original thread]
tanks apparently can run over LAVs and not be kicked for friendly fire. but shooting at a tank with an assault rifle gets you kicked. FF sucks. period. at least, the part that bans you for doing a terrible calculation of 'total damage' done, with...
- by Rannici - at 2013.12.11 03:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |