| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
261. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Commandos are currently garbage, and many heavies have not, and will not put SP into them until they're fixed. Don't talk about my baby like that!!! But yes, it is garbage in its current state ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:23:00
|
262. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zerus Ni'Kator wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: My alt runs Amarr Heavy + Laser Rifle Also watch the opening movie, you'll see the heavies with laser rifles and swarms. not scrubby, intended You're honestly probably slightly disagreeing to the...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:14:00
|
263. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Using a medium frame with light weapons is actually easier, the only people who complain about heavies with light weapons are those who can't aim very well. Commandos are currently garbage, and many heavies have not, and wil...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:11:00
|
264. [Suggestion] Overhaul KDR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: And what do ya mean by double tap? There are very few weapons in Dust that doing a double tap would do the right damage to terminate a clone in bleedout. Either a single shot or more than 2 shots ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 18:16:00
|
265. [Suggestion] Overhaul KDR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: Guys, removing the reward for knockout and shifting it to termination just means that everyone will double-tap everything forever. That is *not* good for the gameplay, because you then have to develop OCD to get your kill WP...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 14:58:00
|
266. BAMM Learns to Fly Derpships - in General Discussions [original thread]
Haha, good stuff Bamm. Looking at the video is a pure dose of deja vu with my own flying I've only moved into double digits over the last few weeks of successful landings. Somebody up above suggested Gorgons and I'll second that. With no SP sp...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 14:31:00
|
267. [Suggestion] Overhaul KDR - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 Good stuff Grit. I'm in total agreement with your view that the present KDR is not something that should be part of Dust. Too many posers playing the game afraid to push an objective etc. not because of potential ISK loss, but because of thei...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 14:07:00
|
268. Templar Code for 2.5mil - in General Discussions [original thread]
10mil sent for 4 tickets I like the odds.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.20 23:20:00
|
269. [Game mechanic being abused] This breaks Planetary Conquest - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
noob cavman wrote: demens grimwulff wrote: noob cavman wrote: I think I've had ale less bitter than this thread you're not drinking the malty stuff then :). I have had some very bitter ale... Tasted like vinegar, but damn it was goo...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.07 08:19:00
|
270. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: Robocop Junior wrote: Lol 5000!? You could blow up the MCC with enough! Well not really but still make easy work of supply depots, CRUs, etc. And the problem with that would be? Any way I know 5000 is way to mutc...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 11:21:00
|
271. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: R/Es can already kill HAVs. Sure, you can stick them on the back of the HAV, but that's actually prone to fail. The ground with PMs is a much better alternative. Battlefield tactics are pretty solid. That only works with...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:33:00
|
272. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Breach RE. 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. I'm not sure on that damage, but yes to the concept.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:32:00
|
273. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Blaze Ashra wrote: Yes and no. Proxies should be buffed so that 2 or 3 can kill a tank if they're not paying attention so we can cut down on the tank spam by setting up minefields. RE do the job...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:27:00
|
274. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Spent the majority of the match in a Scout suit getting behind this Rail Tanker who was spawn camping the outpost in an Ambush match. Threw three remote explosives on his back end and detonated. It didn't kill him and he actua...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:15:00
|
275. FW - don't blame me when i kill you on purpose - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: echo47 wrote: Or instead of team killing you could just say so on coms. Haha, the optimism that a random blueberry is going to be on coms. Or even listen to you. I've had a rare few ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 02:20:00
|
276. FW - don't blame me when i kill you on purpose - in General Discussions [original thread]
echo47 wrote: Or instead of team killing you could just say so on coms. Haha, the optimism that a random blueberry is going to be on coms.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 02:10:00
|
277. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: Of course Knight could pretend it's actually a troll thread, but he'd have more credit in my book by staying the course. I do see I was wrong by TKing him now, and I did lash out (C'mon, it w...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:53:00
|
278. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Princess Abi-Hime wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Pretty sure this is a troll thread. Acting ret@rded isn't trolling. What does Retatrded mean? Is that even a word? Lol
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:46:00
|
279. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Pretty sure this is a troll thread. And I'm pretty sure the most you've done is scim read the thread. Is that what they call reading ev...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:44:00
|
280. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Knight Soiaire wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: Pathetic response Knight You can't even admit that you were more than likely in the wrong. It's people like you that are the issue in Dust. El...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |