| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
221. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: That caldari sentinel is awfully tempting. 656 base shield HP, 4 sec shield regen, 1 sec depleted regen, 30 hp/sec. Fit a complex regulator in the lowslot, 1 complex energizer, 1 complex recharger, 2 complex extender...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:56:00
|
222. Commando Registry // Scouts only think they got it bad - in General Discussions [original thread]
I do run commando but, I'm not sure if my name should be added since I don't run it all the time since I've enough SP to have enough suits to suit different maps and situations. It'd be tied with my mini assault after my sentinel for the amount ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:51:00
|
223. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kigurosaka Laaksonen wrote: I don't run a light weapon heavy, but consider this. I didn't want to skill into Amarr Heavy frames. There are no other racial heavy frames. So until there are, I'll use a Militia or Standard Heavy frame. For guys ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:40:00
|
224. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zerus Ni'Kator wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Using a medium frame with light weapons is actually easier, the only people who complain about heavies with light weapons are those who can't aim very well. Commandos are ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:33:00
|
225. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Commandos are currently garbage, and many heavies have not, and will not put SP into them until they're fixed. Don't talk about my baby like that!!! But yes, it is garbage in its current state ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:23:00
|
226. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zerus Ni'Kator wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: My alt runs Amarr Heavy + Laser Rifle Also watch the opening movie, you'll see the heavies with laser rifles and swarms. not scrubby, intended You're honestly probably slightly disagreeing to the...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:14:00
|
227. Heavy Suits using Light Weapons - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Using a medium frame with light weapons is actually easier, the only people who complain about heavies with light weapons are those who can't aim very well. Commandos are currently garbage, and many heavies have not, and wil...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 22:11:00
|
228. BAMM Learns to Fly Derpships - in General Discussions [original thread]
Haha, good stuff Bamm. Looking at the video is a pure dose of deja vu with my own flying I've only moved into double digits over the last few weeks of successful landings. Somebody up above suggested Gorgons and I'll second that. With no SP sp...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.21 14:31:00
|
229. Templar Code for 2.5mil - in General Discussions [original thread]
10mil sent for 4 tickets I like the odds.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2014.01.20 23:20:00
|
230. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: Robocop Junior wrote: Lol 5000!? You could blow up the MCC with enough! Well not really but still make easy work of supply depots, CRUs, etc. And the problem with that would be? Any way I know 5000 is way to mutc...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 11:21:00
|
231. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kasote Denzara wrote: R/Es can already kill HAVs. Sure, you can stick them on the back of the HAV, but that's actually prone to fail. The ground with PMs is a much better alternative. Battlefield tactics are pretty solid. That only works with...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:33:00
|
232. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Breach RE. 3500 damage, 0.5m radius. I'm not sure on that damage, but yes to the concept.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:32:00
|
233. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Blaze Ashra wrote: Yes and no. Proxies should be buffed so that 2 or 3 can kill a tank if they're not paying attention so we can cut down on the tank spam by setting up minefields. RE do the job...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:27:00
|
234. Should Remote Explosives Kill a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Spent the majority of the match in a Scout suit getting behind this Rail Tanker who was spawn camping the outpost in an Ambush match. Threw three remote explosives on his back end and detonated. It didn't kill him and he actua...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 10:15:00
|
235. FW - don't blame me when i kill you on purpose - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: echo47 wrote: Or instead of team killing you could just say so on coms. Haha, the optimism that a random blueberry is going to be on coms. Or even listen to you. I've had a rare few ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 02:20:00
|
236. FW - don't blame me when i kill you on purpose - in General Discussions [original thread]
echo47 wrote: Or instead of team killing you could just say so on coms. Haha, the optimism that a random blueberry is going to be on coms.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 02:10:00
|
237. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: Of course Knight could pretend it's actually a troll thread, but he'd have more credit in my book by staying the course. I do see I was wrong by TKing him now, and I did lash out (C'mon, it w...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:53:00
|
238. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Princess Abi-Hime wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Pretty sure this is a troll thread. Acting ret@rded isn't trolling. What does Retatrded mean? Is that even a word? Lol
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:46:00
|
239. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: Pretty sure this is a troll thread. And I'm pretty sure the most you've done is scim read the thread. Is that what they call reading ev...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:44:00
|
240. Idiot AVers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Knight Soiaire wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: Pathetic response Knight You can't even admit that you were more than likely in the wrong. It's people like you that are the issue in Dust. El...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.12.29 01:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |