| Pages: 1 2 [3] |
41. If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: so more then a year now and people still ask this question? use the search function. More than a year now, and tankers still think it should take half a squad to kill them playing solo. Also, the search function doesn't y...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 01:49:00
|
42. If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aizen Intiki wrote: We plug ourselves into the HAV, so we can control many of the functions at the same time. Degraging ourselves to mortal ways of life is silly. no. Pointless blanket excuse that means nothing. Actual, logical, gameplay bala...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 01:47:00
|
43. If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
DeadlyAztec11 wrote: buzzzzzzz killllllllll wrote: ccp should make it so the driver can only use the front turret, and a gunner can use the large turret Boom. Tanker Logic. Wait a minute.... I know another alt of Long Evity..... and he...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 01:21:00
|
44. What Do You Classify As Scrub or Unskilled? - in General Discussions [original thread]
People who camp rooftops in full proto with rail rifles People who magically have more strafe speed than a scout in a heavily armored tanked Gallogi/Callogi/Galassault/Calassault (I assume kb/m is at fault but don't know for certain) People who ...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 01:12:00
|
45. If tankers insist that it should take 2+ ppl to kill them.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Then shouldn't they require the same number of people to run their tanks? I mean... If you are taking 3 people's attention away from focusing on winning the match just to deal with you, shouldn't you require the same number of people to distract t...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 01:10:00
|
46. MIA: Closed Beta Vets - in General Discussions [original thread]
I-Shayz-I wrote: Does Sota Pop still play? He still posts.... I know he still plays on at least one of his alts. For the security of his identity however.... I'm not saying who.
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 00:50:00
|
47. MIA: Closed Beta Vets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: Free Beers wrote: #LifeWasBetterInChromosome except for the hit detection of course and the sticky terrain/structures Still prevalent in mountain areas, especially around objective "C" on Manus Peak, but they were d...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 00:46:00
|
48. MIA: Closed Beta Vets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Snagman 313 wrote: Haven't seen Sir Meode in a long time, which is a shame. But LHughes is still about, I see him at least a few times a month. I never see him, perhaps because I play on American servers 99% of the time. As for Meode... I do...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 00:31:00
|
49. PVE Gamemodes - in General Discussions [original thread]
PvE needs to be a part of PC. You need to keep your districts constantly maintained and drone-free in order to keep the district. You can go in and do it yourself, or you can pay for another corp to go in and clear the district for you. Also, in o...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 00:28:00
|
50. Why are all minmatar suits losing their base armor rep rate in 1.8? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Change the assault suit bonus to PG/CPU reduction to light weapons and sidearms so that it parallells the logi's equipment bonus, then give the Minmatar the RoF bonus instead of the damage mod bonus. Boom. Minmatar assault is the DPS glass cannon ...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.26 00:05:00
|
51. Dear CCP, will we see a Matari AV soon(ish)? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: Just curious if you think we'll see any (proper) light Minmatar AV weapons in the next 6 months or if you think it'll be at least 6 months until you get around to it. I'd LOVE to have something to use ot...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 23:41:00
|
52. Would restoring the old movement penalty for armour plates make you stop using t... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: BL4CKST4R wrote: OverIord Ulath wrote: Henchmen21 wrote: So then all armor tanking options would either be useless or extremely prohibitive that sounds like a great idea. No less so than...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 23:29:00
|
53. Dear CCP, will we see a Matari AV soon(ish)? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roofer Madness wrote: We already have it. Duh. It's called a Jihad Jeep. Throwing Matari RE's on a Gallente or Caldari LAV and trying to hit a tank with it before it taps you with it's guns or before a stray red shoots at your car hardly mak...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 23:17:00
|
54. Dear CCP, will we see a Matari AV soon(ish)? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Just curious if you think we'll see any (proper) light Minmatar AV weapons in the next 6 months or if you think it'll be at least 6 months until you get around to it. I'd LOVE to have something to use other than Caldari tech or the PLC to take veh...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 23:10:00
|
55. Swarm Launchers should be removed - a balanced argument - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: DeadlyAztec11 wrote: And replaced with a laser guided weapon. The biggest issue with them is that it is hard to balance a weapon that is so easy to operate. To be honest I think laser guided is the way to go. You st...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 23:01:00
|
56. MIA: Closed Beta Vets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Berserker007 wrote: add me to the list ... just give input on forum once blue moon also have people like : Doug Ugly God-Nova Cyn Bruin Tony Calif Enigma Ludwig von Beat Caeli Sinedo Tony Calif is one I wanted to add but I couldn't remember...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 22:34:00
|
57. Would restoring the old movement penalty for armour plates make you stop using t... - in General Discussions [original thread]
The reason armor tanking became way better than shield tanking is because they both buffed the armor-per-plate and gave a reduction to the speed penalty. On top of that, there were very few options for anti-armor weapons. One was a sidearm, one ...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 22:08:00
|
58. Would restoring the old movement penalty for armour plates make you stop using t... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: So then all armor tanking options would either be useless or extremely prohibitive that sounds like a great idea. No less so than shield extenders. It would mean you actually have serious drawbacks to armor like you already...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 21:52:00
|
59. MIA: Closed Beta Vets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Who are some closed beta vets (Codex or earlier players) that you remember that you haven't seen in a long time or don't see much of anymore? Here's some I can think of that I haven't seen in-game in a long time: ReFlex Mr. Zitro Omnipotent Zitro...
- by OverIord Ulath - at 2014.01.25 21:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |