| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
221. an i dea on how to fix PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tallen Ellecon wrote: Our alliance alliance was doing fairly well and we had a significant EVE presence, but PC from the start was in favor of those who exploited it. We were trying to field men from matches anywhere from 5 - 10 times a day, an...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 23:39:00
|
222. How Does Local Chat work? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spademan wrote: Since we're both already here, I think it's to do with the Star System you are currently located in, we can't change where we are but Eve players can, and so move freely from chat to chat. If you look at the map, or I think the ...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 23:35:00
|
223. an i dea on how to fix PC - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: the fact of the matter is that PC is broken and meaningless except for the isk farming. I propose no corp should be allowed to either lock districts or fight any other corp they have an alliance with for isk. I'll let c...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 23:32:00
|
224. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Zekain K wrote: Deployables will turn into kinetic bombs. They'll be dropped on tanks as soon as they're brought in. They could be called in like vehicles. Meaning you'd have to be there to squash the tank with it. ...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 23:08:00
|
225. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jadd Hatchen wrote: Outer Raven wrote: It would be nice if in pub matches you called them in with wp earned via accumulated team points same as the orbital strike. While in FW an PC you would buy from an assortment of armaments, not just in...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 19:54:00
|
226. The future of Deployable Installations and armaments - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
We have the deployable installation tab already but I have not heard if or when it will be active. Was this ever a thing (in closed beta) an a post release merc like myself just missed out. Strategically calling in installations or armaments co...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 18:31:00
|
227. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Book of Armaments, chapter two, verses nine through twenty-one. And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O Lord, bless this thy hand grenade, that with it thou mayst blow thine enemies to tiny bits, in thy ...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 18:02:00
|
228. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
One potential deployable that came to mind was the Mortar cannon . A weapon that has been increasingly asked for an even CCP Dev's stated would in some form be implemented. It would work greatly as a deployable since its highly situational, good ...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 17:25:00
|
229. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
JL3Eleven wrote: I will be shooting down EvE pilots with my installations and protecting my newly acquired territory from outside interference. not sure about the eve pilot skeet shooting since we currently have a whole large tower like stru...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 16:36:00
|
230. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also on the topic of animation I LOOOve it if the planetary entry an damper activation looked almost like or similar to these. Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 16:18:00
|
231. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote: TL;DR I think you should be able to customize them and stuff. and give them more health than tanks, since they are immobile. I've always wanted to call an installation down on the perfect spot to guard an objecti...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 16:09:00
|
232. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zekain K wrote: Deployable's will turn into kinetic bombs. They'll be dropped on tanks as soon as they're brought in. That would be interesting but can be easily side stepped in one of two ways. A. Either reduced impact damage across the boa...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 16:01:00
|
233. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also if you feel up to the challenge list some deployables you would like to see if this came to be.
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 15:29:00
|
234. The future of deployable installations an armaments - in General Discussions [original thread]
We have the deployable installation tab already but I have not heard if or when it will be active. Was this ever a thing (in closed beta) an a post release bastard like myself just missed out. Strategically calling in installations or armaments...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.15 15:25:00
|
235. Liking Chromosome Over Uprisping, Answer: *Roles*, Also CCP's Uprising Paral... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mossellia Delt wrote: Heres the problem I forsee if we give scouts their "roles" Scouts will turn into useless pieces of crap that arnt fun to play (Not that they arnt close already) Scouts to me have always been the fast, high alpha damage hi...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.14 10:29:00
|
236. Liking Chromosome Over Uprisping, Answer: *Roles*, Also CCP's Uprising Paral... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Are you proposing tiericide then for optimal suit customization. If so I agree with Joel II X that most will opt for slayer play styles as most suits (Heavy, Medium, an Light) are being used for now. I agree with the OP sentiment that true roles h...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.13 08:19:00
|
237. [Request] Variable sniper zoom - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As I mentioned earlier in the post I'm in favor of visual magnification over zoom. Could be a new skill in the Sniper Rifle tree where you skill into it till level 5 called Variable Magnification. While in game the rifle gets a new tab added to i...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.13 05:52:00
|
238. Spawning on an objective that is being hacked - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bazookah Tooth wrote: Wouldnt the problem be that everyone would pull out a scout suit with adv codebreaker? Would this really be a problem, as it stands now scouts are just being used to slay foregoing any of there actual proposed use. Openi...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.11 19:31:00
|
239. Spawning on an objective that is being hacked - in General Discussions [original thread]
Domination matches don't allow any one team to spawn on the letter an this can make some very intense an strategic matches. Skirmish or skirmish 2.0 aka (Conquest Mode) should be completely void of letter spawning. Unless its a CRU, uplink, or MCC...
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.11 19:25:00
|
240. A Safe Haven For Good Snipers - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would like to join the channel as well.
- by Outer Raven - at 2013.11.11 19:17:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |