| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
461. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Winsaucerer wrote: What I read that to mean is: be uber-tanky for a short time, and quite vulnerable for the rest, OR be middle-of-the-road tanky all the time. That is, the active version will be much tankier than your passive fit for its bri...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 06:00:00
|
462. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
D legendary hero wrote: *single tire rolls down face* MY fellow piolots and I salute 07 When you're happy, you let people drive over your head? You must be swedish. They're always doing that World's strongest man stuff.
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 04:01:00
|
463. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: I didnt spec into tanks so someone else could use it This guy gets it.
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:57:00
|
464. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry Why not hold off the reds until your own team can come and hack the Supply depot? I guess that would make too much sense! If I could h...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:49:00
|
465. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sotapopthegrey gay wrote: Tanking (easy mode.) It really isn't.
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:42:00
|
466. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Our Deepest Regret wrote: Winsaucerer wrote: This is not the impression I received, but without numbers it is hard to tell. I received the impression that being a tank you can TANK in is going to be harder...except for during a short windo...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:36:00
|
467. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
double post
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:34:00
|
468. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oh, man, I finally got my Madrugar to a respectable level. Running with two hardeners makes all the frickin' difference in the world. I still lost it, but god, I made those bastards work for it. Now I gotta memorize those stupid maps.
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 03:22:00
|
469. how does the local chat channel work - in General Discussions [original thread]
Power on your playstation 3. Select Dust 514. Wait for it to load. Enter a skirmish. During Briefing, ask if anyone has a mic. Someone will say yes. You will hear kids in the background. Express surprise that there are kids there. Say something...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.28 00:10:00
|
470. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: They were easily countered by 2 proto forge gunners, js. No one decided tobdo that for some reason cuz they certainly do now but they were beatable with teamwork, like tanks over standard level should be Ah, gotcha.
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 19:07:00
|
471. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: I have no respect for the Ancient Exiles. You are no different. Your clan abuses glitches openly and every time I play you I get sick. I've killed your tanks and I have no respect for you or anyone in your group. Mary, w...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 19:05:00
|
472. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shadow of War88 wrote: uhm can we keep it simple and just get the sagaris back? TECH tanks wud b a nightmare to balance Plus sagaris has already been tested, used, and balanced properly. BRING IT BACK! 5 high, 3 low, no speed penalty, 30...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 19:00:00
|
473. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Kage Roth wrote: I still want a stasis webifier deployable to equip to infantry. Say it would slow vehicles down 60% for 60 seconds in an 8 meter radius when activated. Long enough to counter active mods. It would take luck to...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 18:55:00
|
474. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Charlotte O'Dell wrote: I want a reapec. Me too. My take on the upcoming changes is that active mods will be used to boost survivability for offensive tanks, and that passive mods will be used by defensive oriented tanks. Oh man. A redirec...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 18:53:00
|
475. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Just because you don't want them doesn't mean that you can't use them Surely you can use your SP in small turrets to spice up your fittings, to create more team oriented tanks, nes pas? It sounds nice, but the extra ...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 18:41:00
|
476. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vespasian Andendare wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: I am skilled deeply into small turrets. If small turrets will no longer needed in order to fit a tank, I don't want them anymore. Can I have an SP refund? Why did you skill deeply into sm...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 18:35:00
|
477. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
You know what? I gave it some thought and I am really excited. I think that with these changes, and the right application of skill points, I am finally going to be able to build my BRICK. A HAV with low offensive capabilities that's compensated f...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 17:55:00
|
478. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am skilled deeply into small turrets. If small turrets will no longer needed in order to fit a tank, I don't want them anymore. Can I have an SP refund?
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 17:35:00
|
479. Let's Start A Witch Hunt - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTah Pawp wrote: Our Deepest Regret wrote: Aisha Ctarl wrote: We all know the name of the player using the melee exploit....how about we all just hunt her (assuming she is really a she) down and make her DUST experience a living hell? ...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 01:28:00
|
480. Let's Start A Witch Hunt - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aisha Ctarl wrote: We all know the name of the player using the melee exploit....how about we all just hunt her (assuming she is really a she) down and make her DUST experience a living hell? I'm pretty sure knowing that the entirety of the f...
- by Our Deepest Regret - at 2013.08.27 01:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |