| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
2581. Patchnotes or GTFO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Make it happen I'd rather not. As a ds pilot, I'm terrified. Let me cling to false hope for another 2 months. you mean, getting them fixed? logically I'd expect some improve...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 20:09:00
|
2582. Patchnotes or GTFO - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Make it happen I'd rather not. As a ds pilot, I'm terrified. Let me cling to false hope for another 2 months.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 20:06:00
|
2583. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
General Tiberius1 wrote: Baal Omniscient wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Defience is average at best and the PVE content has stupid AI and arc missions are crap We've yet to see how well CCP will do AI in a FPS, so we should probably r...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 20:05:00
|
2584. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Halador Osiris wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: General Tiberius1 wrote: wait, what? sony has y'alls hands tied? Not our hands tied, it just means while we wait for that build to go through QA we start work on the next one. Then when it ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 20:03:00
|
2585. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: *cough*dropship's*cough* I really hope the reason for drop-ships ridiculous state and AB nerf is simply that CCP has two builds going. 1. The Development build where they have made lots of new changes (like adding cloaking)....
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 19:55:00
|
2586. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
oops pyramid quote
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 19:51:00
|
2587. New build 'Uprising' on May 6th? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The three things I'm interested in to know if they'll be included: 1. vehicle balancing 2. Drop-ship cloaking (scouts get it already, comeon) 3. Increased map size
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.26 18:59:00
|
2588. vehicle discussion! (i would love to get some devs on) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Afterburners are trash bow, recommending someone put them on their DS shows a basic lack of familiarity with dropships. gft
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.25 22:07:00
|
2589. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rasatsu wrote: So Paper wants a no-Rock game mode? This is pretty much it. I can't see a CCP style game working within that construct. It's antithesis to everything EVE is and everything dust has so far been designed as.
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:54:00
|
2590. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Again so you draw the exception at LAV's Because they're worthless. You COULD spend 500k on one but it would be taken out by free swarms instantly so nobody does. Now if you'd just also admit t...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:53:00
|
2591. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: gbghg wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: "Dropships are OP, they're killing everyone and I can't take it down with free AV!" ~Said no one ever I hate to break it to you but XV1 wrote: Most dropships see...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:48:00
|
2592. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: "Dropships are OP, they're killing everyone and I can't take it down with free AV!" ~Said no one ever I hate to break it to you but XV1 wrote: Most dropships seem to ust outrun my swarm missiles, maki...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:33:00
|
2593. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: That's just what this games needs. A game with specialization and variety of skills to be broken apart into subsets. Now I have never driven a tank and never want to. However look at this from my ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:21:00
|
2594. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Vermaak Doe wrote: So segregating graduates and drop outs is the only way for things go to work when there are wayys around it already? You need 8 guys for a corp battle, there's 2 guys equally good at infantry, but only ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:15:00
|
2595. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Anyone who wanted to use guns would be using guns in IO Anyone who wanted to blow up tanks with gear that cost 1000x less than the tanks would join the other ambush. Anyone who wanted to lose their tank ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 22:14:00
|
2596. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: gbghg wrote: The only way noobs become AV people who know what they're doing is by going up against tanks, willingly or not. I never learned how to sow, you going to force me to learn how to sow? W...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:51:00
|
2597. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: yeah... And you're proving my point that if you eliminate rock from rock paper scissors which is FINE. Then you end up with paper scissors which is inherently broken . Why would anyone switch to paper ...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:22:00
|
2598. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vermaak Doe wrote: No one mentioned Italian food even though I was eating spaghetti not long ago I really got a hankering for chipotle reading this thread. Not sure why,
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:20:00
|
2599. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: It essentially would when you look at the prices. AV (cheap) as in free-tens of thousands. Vehicles. Effectively range from 500k-million ISK ds and 1-3 million ISk tanks. Tell me, what idiot will cal...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:16:00
|
2600. Yeah... I'm gonna go ahead and say infantry only Ambush is a -horrible- idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Nguruthos IX wrote: Obviously all this will do is create a game mode of AV vs Tanks. And gun-infantry vs gun-infantry. See the problem? The rock paper scissors here is Infantry --> AV --> Tanks --> Infantry No...
- by Nguruthos IX - at 2013.03.23 21:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |