| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1541. To Rattati: Sights and rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
There was talk about this... However, it does require some coding and a bit of asset modeling, soooo..
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 01:28:00
|
1542. so much tears recently - in General Discussions [original thread]
Georgia Xavier wrote: Well yeah,I do have all those,what's your point? What do you hate ie. What pisses you off when you're killed by it?
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 01:27:00
|
1543. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: The only reason I argue in these threads is so that they don't run away with themselves and see certain over reacting groups be allowed to nerf the weapon to the point of uselessness for their own sake or compromise the cha...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 01:25:00
|
1544. so much tears recently - in General Discussions [original thread]
Georgia Xavier wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: i do use it OP. you suck. Well good for you, now stop being an ass Says you... What do you hate? Heavies? Scouts? Minsaults? REs? Because I'll tell you the same thing: get g++d or use it yo...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 01:12:00
|
1545. A fact even the devs know - in General Discussions [original thread]
John Psi wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Scrambler is more effective to armor than the combat rifle. U mean tactical spammable scrambler and turbo controller? Wanted to surprise someone? FTFY Aaaaand before anyone gets "prissy," this...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 00:54:00
|
1546. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Regardless, I don't like when people throw out an entire argument for one statement that is not entirely true. You didn't even consider the rest of it
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 00:49:00
|
1547. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: -snip- Who the hell goes for direct hits with the MD?
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 00:26:00
|
1548. So I got my lifetime stats today. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why is it embarrasing...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 00:02:00
|
1549. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lynn Beck wrote: Oh and did i mention even a AMD hitting for 60 damage stops our regen, while you can potentially halve it's DPS with onboard reps alone? Hell, I had a guy pinging me with an SMG from 50 meters stopping my regen...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.12 00:00:00
|
1550. Has anyone noticed how OPPPPPP! the scrambler rifle is ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: No, I'm pointing out that the weapon does too well in CQC when it's designed for mid to long range combat. YES! THANK YOU! I keep saying this, but it is ALWAYS ignored.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:57:00
|
1551. Would you guys still video game if dust dissapeared ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
el OPERATOR wrote: The same way whatever knowledge you brought here from whatever you played before (idgaf if it was poker) you used here to grow here. Didn't work with the games I played...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:48:00
|
1552. A fact even the devs know - in General Discussions [original thread]
Templar XIII wrote: No need to be so...prissy. Templar XIII wrote: You did notice that this as well as OPs statement was a defamatory generalization, easily subsumed under the term exaggeration, didn't you? Who's prissy?
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:46:00
|
1553. Would you guys still video game if dust dissapeared ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DAAAA BEAST wrote: Summer just came around pretty much around where I live I wish it was here...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:44:00
|
1554. How do i - in General Discussions [original thread]
SiSi I think... No idea what it is though
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:44:00
|
1555. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: A good idea indeed, give it less dmage up close, that seems like a fair nerf that won't break the gun. Apparently, people disagree
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:39:00
|
1556. Would you guys still video game if dust dissapeared ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I would still video game... Though i'd be jumping around from one game to the next.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:36:00
|
1557. A fact even the devs know - in General Discussions [original thread]
Templar XIII wrote: Quite frankly, this sums up most #PLEASENERFSCRINTOTHEGROUND arguments I have seen around here so far. Thanks for that clarification. And you rapped on me for objectivity...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:32:00
|
1558. Dust Gamer-tags - in General Discussions [original thread]
PLAYSTTION wrote: Salvation came 2000 years ago bro. And your names better then mine, so ya its good. Need a corp? Check us out. Corrosive Synergy Recruitment Video Forum recruitment Post.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:29:00
|
1559. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
KingBabar wrote: unless I am postioned at reasonable range Here, you highlight my beef with it. It can be used very efficiently in CQC, even though it has a CQC variant. I'm not sure why people want it to be good in CQC too, but I have a the...
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 23:28:00
|
1560. Until I see... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Templar XIII wrote: I do welcome every discussion regarding ScR, but please keep it objective. However, if I were to be objective, there would be no argument At least not as effective.
- by LUGMOS - at 2015.03.11 22:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |