| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3021. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: It's MLT and PRO. You still don't get it, do you. Will you be happy if MLT tanks cost 500,000 ISK? Not necessarily happy, but considering their effectiveness and the fact it might stop tanks spam at least in FW i wouldn...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 04:06:00
|
3022. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: So that means they should hold all the influence over CCP, and the small playerbase that are tankers should hold exactly none? That's not exactly fair, or balanced. Like AV was up until 1.7. Not saying it was. But tankin...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 04:04:00
|
3023. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Letting infantry dictate balance resulted in tanks being nerfed what, 5 or 6 bu...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:18:00
|
3024. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dropsuits.and 100% more effe...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:15:00
|
3025. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win. I'll say it a...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:14:00
|
3026. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe it's just all the other w...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:12:00
|
3027. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flix Keptick wrote: Because tanks in bf4 are freeeeeeeeee, therefore it doesn't matter if one looses 7 of them in one game Again , my MLT tanks are cheaper than my Dropsuits.and 100% more effective in everything but capping points. After 1....
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:10:00
|
3028. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: So the game should balanced on whether or not someone already knows a tanker? Well thats what you are saying! = Have a tank on your team or you cant win.
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:08:00
|
3029. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
More of why we need an immediate fix even if its temporal: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=129335&find=unread https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=129346&find=unread https://forums.dust514.com/d...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:03:00
|
3030. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, an...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 03:01:00
|
3031. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:59:00
|
3032. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destr...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:55:00
|
3033. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:55:00
|
3034. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
negative49er wrote: this will be good to show how op tanks are when the dev can't destroy a tank that will nerf it REmember 65k ! Sica 2 Shield HArdeners 1 Armor rep 1 Armor hardener Blaster! You can keep fighting! 1 shield hardene...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:52:00
|
3035. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: I don't know what you are talking about, its playable I'm gonna be getting on at 10 to play some games. Had a buddy I was playing with that had av grenades and scared off all the tanks that came our way, wasn't a problem at ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:47:00
|
3036. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to th...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:41:00
|
3037. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to their strength especially vs AV. Because tanker...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:37:00
|
3038. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Sounds like it's working as intended. Tanks are force multipliers and the go-to for escalating situations. Been tired of seeing CoD 514 where everyone ran around with nothing but rifles and wondering why the maps are so big. Asid...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:36:00
|
3039. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Some people go about issues the wrong way on these forums......OK a lot of people do. Doing something like the op suggested would take away a fun aspect of the game. You don't know what they may call in, what combination the...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:30:00
|
3040. Assault rail rifle is a beast in cqc. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zekain K wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Zekain K wrote: And it can probably cause epileptic shock. ARR is DECENT in CQ. To be honest i think every other rifle is better in CQ. SPECIALLY the A.CR. the ACR just shreds through every...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |