| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2981. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Burntface man112 wrote: 15 of my best Corp mates refuse to play now because AVs where what they skill into entirely since they volunteer for that role for the Corporation for the PC battles... Now they have no longer any ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:59:00
|
2982. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still trying to use AV to destr...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:55:00
|
2983. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: *Comes in tread to have a logical conversation* *Sees the guy who was complaining about proximity mines* *Leaves thread* +1 Spkr4theDead: your credibility is rapidly going down the sewer...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:55:00
|
2984. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
negative49er wrote: this will be good to show how op tanks are when the dev can't destroy a tank that will nerf it REmember 65k ! Sica 2 Shield HArdeners 1 Armor rep 1 Armor hardener Blaster! You can keep fighting! 1 shield hardene...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:52:00
|
2985. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: I don't know what you are talking about, its playable I'm gonna be getting on at 10 to play some games. Had a buddy I was playing with that had av grenades and scared off all the tanks that came our way, wasn't a problem at ...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:47:00
|
2986. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to th...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:41:00
|
2987. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Killar-12 wrote: Why not just increase price Tanks are Cheap and rather strong, why not put the price out of range for most but for dedicated tankers it might not be as much of an issue due to their strength especially vs AV. Because tanker...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:37:00
|
2988. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Sounds like it's working as intended. Tanks are force multipliers and the go-to for escalating situations. Been tired of seeing CoD 514 where everyone ran around with nothing but rifles and wondering why the maps are so big. Asid...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:36:00
|
2989. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Some people go about issues the wrong way on these forums......OK a lot of people do. Doing something like the op suggested would take away a fun aspect of the game. You don't know what they may call in, what combination the...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:30:00
|
2990. Assault rail rifle is a beast in cqc. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zekain K wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Zekain K wrote: And it can probably cause epileptic shock. ARR is DECENT in CQ. To be honest i think every other rifle is better in CQ. SPECIALLY the A.CR. the ACR just shreds through every...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:27:00
|
2991. the good/bad old days - in General Discussions [original thread]
i miss when DUST514 was a first person shooter with RPG elements........... Not World of Tanks with Tryhard MMO elements....
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
2992. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: It looks like Dev is on today's menu, mercs! Keep an eye out for "Other Contracts" in your Battle Finder - first set of contracts will show up in about 40 minutes. Let the Dev Invasion begin! Remember people/ Give em t...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:23:00
|
2993. Assault rail rifle is a beast in cqc. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zekain K wrote: And it can probably cause epileptic shock. ARR is DECENT in CQ. To be honest i think every other rifle is better in CQ. SPECIALLY the A.CR.
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:22:00
|
2994. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Setting limits to what mercs can field is a bad idea. It takes away the freedom to use what ever the hell you want. CCP please don't do this, next thing you know...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:21:00
|
2995. The scanner is a crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nestil wrote: i love farming proto logis that rely soley on their scanners. but need to spec more deeper into dampening skills so i dont need to sacrifice slots on my paper suit. WHAT? even at Level 5 scout and Level 5 dampening you will ge...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:16:00
|
2996. The scanner is a crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: Well, it's not a crutch for a scout/light suit. That is actually what that suit is for. Wish they'd make it a scout suit only tool. Make it worthless with out the bonuses from the scout suit. This is not an origi...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:15:00
|
2997. Forget swarms for tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Okay. Respec then please. THIS
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:13:00
|
2998. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Setting limits to what mercs can field is a bad idea. It takes away the freedom to use what ever the hell you want. CCP please don't do this, next thing you know they will be asking t...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:09:00
|
2999. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slag Emberforge wrote: Believe it or not as much as I hate tank spam I don't know that depressing out the current vehicle cap is the solution. The balance is not way off, a slight reduction in tank speed, and a slight boost of AV (not necessar...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:08:00
|
3000. This just in - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mr CreepyPasta wrote: BULLSH*T my tank goes for 800k a pop! dont go putting true tank fits in the same category as the militia trash! use MILITIA tank scrubs are then all that sh*t tired of being f*cking grouped with scrubs, Im actually spec'd...
- by KING CHECKMATE - at 2013.12.16 02:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |