| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
661. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: Tbh, i don't give a kitttenfart about content at this stage of the game. The game is still fatally crippled by it's core mechanics. The testers know it, the devs know it, the media knows it. At this point, content is like ...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 13:43:00
|
662. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Ignoble Son wrote: Ignoble Son wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: New update is just the addition of a star map? Nothing more than rumors. I'm Betting that the star map is still another year out. that's a joke a throw around,...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 13:18:00
|
663. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ignoble Son wrote: Sgt Kirk wrote: New update is just the addition of a star map? Nothing more than rumors. I'm Betting that the star map is still another year out. that's a joke a throw around, about the star map. You see I can do th...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 12:43:00
|
664. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: New update is just the addition of a star map? Nothing more than rumors.
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 12:38:00
|
665. All Ambush is now, is just tank warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Yawn... didn't read anything in this thread, but: I want to see CCP implement a tanks only ambush variant. How awesome would this be? Even if it was just for a week or even a day.
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 11:37:00
|
666. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Three Double-A Batteries wrote: Ignoble Son wrote: Three Double-A Batteries wrote: Belial Farceus wrote: I honestly think we wont see a new build. Ps4 is coming out soon. They are probably working on a port to that rather than a new bu...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 11:00:00
|
667. next build - in General Discussions [original thread]
Three Double-A Batteries wrote: Belial Farceus wrote: I honestly think we wont see a new build. Ps4 is coming out soon. They are probably working on a port to that rather than a new build... that would make sense as to why we havent heard an...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 10:47:00
|
668. When is the next build? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: There is going to be a good dev blog out this Thursday. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWY9bNeXJ8M&feature=youtube_gdata_player Sorry jaded gamer here, just ignore me.
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 05:19:00
|
669. When is the next build? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: At this rate, after a good chunk of the population puts this down for something else. Yah this game is going to be a ghost town here pretty SOONtm, without a massive influx of new content. When was the last time we had new...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.12 04:54:00
|
670. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shadowswipe wrote: Ignoble Son wrote: DJINN leukoplast wrote: These stats were from a few days ago. WP: 465,267 Deaths: 1,226 WP/D: 380 KDR: 5.57 I play ambush about 95% of the time, and a good deal of that is solo play. If I constantly...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 21:29:00
|
671. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Math, I hasn't it 396,842 WP 5,152 Kills What's that work out to? O.o It is very simple to calculate this ratio. Just devide your WP by your kill count. Yours comes out to 77.0
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 19:51:00
|
672. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
ImperfectFan514 wrote: Ignoble Son wrote: ImperfectFan514 wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: This game is so broken right now, as far as I'm concerned the higher your stats are right now the worse you are because you probably just rode there off...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 19:36:00
|
673. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: These stats were from a few days ago. WP: 465,267 Deaths: 1,226 WP/D: 380 KDR: 5.57 I play ambush about 95% of the time, and a good deal of that is solo play. If I constantly ran in skirmish with a group (or even solo)...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 19:32:00
|
674. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
ImperfectFan514 wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: This game is so broken right now, as far as I'm concerned the higher your stats are right now the worse you are because you probably just rode there off the backs of nubs, scrublets, and high end gear...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 19:12:00
|
675. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
ImperfectFan514 wrote: A DUST GOD decided to bless this thread total WP= 1,326,413 total deaths=1,012 WP/D= 1,310.68 which is basically 1,311 ^^^ see what I mean. Now let's see that WP/K.
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 18:54:00
|
676. share your warpoints per death ratio and discuss whether it is a good measure - in General Discussions [original thread]
War points = 641,483 Deaths = 2,733 Ratio =-á234.7 Kill/death = 1.99 Scout mostly, but I do way too much -ástuff on the battlefield to care to catalogue -áit all here. Actually, I don't think that this is an accurate measurement of combat effec...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 18:42:00
|
677. who cares for the objectives? - in General Discussions [original thread]
iceyburnz wrote: TiMeSpLiT--TeR wrote: On skirmish, I flew myself with a cheap dropship on top of a building. Put drop uplinks and nanohives. I equipped with swarm launchers and AV grenades. 9 kills, 2 deaths. Gained 1900 wp. Sp 9000 plus. ...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 17:53:00
|
678. "Stable" variants? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jotun Hiem wrote: While I do support this thread, you might want to move it to the Feedback forum. This isn't feedback. It is a known (fail) quantity. It is "general discussion" because far less people pay attention to "feedback/suggestions...
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 15:17:00
|
679. "Stable" variants? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nanohive CPU/PG = 21/4 Stable nanohive CPU/PG = 21/4 Drop uplink CPU/PG = 38/9 Stable Drop uplink CPU/PG = 38/9 So what is the deal here man? I need these things to be working the way it is stated they are intended to work in their descriptions....
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 14:54:00
|
680. Do the maps have names? If so, what are they? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Galen Gaia wrote: Greetings, Do the maps have names? If so, what are they? Thanks Not very observent are we? I'm going to give you three words and that's all you get. You ready?: Dust map feedback {edit>>> damn, people are to nice.
- by Ignoble Son - at 2013.03.11 13:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |