| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
441. $75 is your deal of the week??? - in General Discussions [original thread]
thehellisgoingon wrote: Clearly taking advantage of mentally challenged kids here. You did good when you put the $50 pack on sale with 50% OFF. Now that your a profitable "company" why don't you thank your players by giving them more. 25% off...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.08 14:49:00
|
442. Dust 514's Planetary Conquest versus EVE's Null Sec - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: I want sustainable, non-exploitable risk and reward end game, that's all. And I want two chicks at the same time, but that's not happening either. So I recommend you work on PC instead.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.08 00:15:00
|
443. CCP going to ps4 vid Omg ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
1/10. Being overly dramatic doesn't deceive anyone. All this did was annoy me at how bad your attempt was, and for that you got a point.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.08 00:13:00
|
444. [CPM] Input : Deployed Sets - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm go ahead and theorize this somehow actually increases lag. With no basis for my argument other than CCP.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.08 00:10:00
|
445. Should we reduce all isk to a average amount? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I see people are still looking for scapegoats and trying to destroy the game in the process. Honestly if matchmaking is working the way its supposed to, Proto should never be a problem for any new player. New players get put in the bottom bracke...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.08 00:06:00
|
446. Yikes! It sucks to be Caldari! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Last time Aldin gave me serious issues was when he had a logi LAV self-repping his shields as he tanked the world with his heavy suit. But that's just picking on him. The point is, every build the meta changes and people change their bullshit tac...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 17:29:00
|
447. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Laughing at ones self, aka self degradation is a sign of desiring acceptance at any cost. But you don't have to pay that cost, Gustavo. I will love you forever and always. Tell me where it hurts.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 16:43:00
|
448. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You seem angry Gustavo. Please, tell me about your life troubles. I am your friend and I am here to help you through this difficult time.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 16:17:00
|
449. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thats just it. There's a tank? Ok, I ignore him and wait inside. What threat does he pose to me now? None. The null cannon is still shooting, why do I give a damn how long he sits out there?
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:53:00
|
450. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Soraya Xel wrote: Tanks are already OP, and you want to buff them by making them able to disable null cannons too. o_o Tanks and turrets being able to damage MCCs was around a long time ago, but it was found to be pretty br...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:43:00
|
451. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
LT SHANKS wrote: Tankers can step out of their vehicles and hack sh it as well. Who says they can't function as infantry? I'm not asking them to function as infantry. I'm asking them to function as vehicles.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:39:00
|
452. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
gustavo acosta wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: I've been in hundreds of PC's and I've never once watched a tank hack a point, or been in a situation where an equal number of AV couldn't have defeated on an equal number of tanks. They don't n...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:36:00
|
453. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
And anti-infantry infantry are vulnerable to tanks. But the difference here is that AV can kill tanks and shoot back at infantry, even if less effectively. Anti-infantry infantry can't do anything to tanks. And tanks can't do anything to objectiv...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:33:00
|
454. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been in hundreds of PC's and I've never once watched a tank hack a point, or been in a situation where an equal number of AV couldn't have defeated on an equal number of tanks.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:28:00
|
455. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Unless the force they are multiplying can enter a building, they are multiplying by zero and are worthless. You know whats funny? Those AV infantry can hack a point. That makes them better.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:24:00
|
456. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Himiko Kuronaga wrote: Tanks can't even hack points how the hell are they OP? Every game mode can be won by reducing the enemy clone count to zero. HAVs are pretty much a-goddamn-mazing at the wholesale genocide of inf...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:18:00
|
457. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks can't even hack points how the hell are they OP? Sit inside building with objective, watch as tank does nothing. That's the extent of their usefulness in most fights. Unless the tank gets super aggressive and starts wedging himself in reall...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:13:00
|
458. Why don't tanks have any kind of worthwhile endgame? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Infantry endgame is taking and holding objectives, which wins the match. Tank endgame is attacking other tanks, while running away from AV. In the case of no AV or enemy tanks, it's shooting at infantry who are not concealed within the loving emb...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 15:03:00
|
459. What is the single worst thing to happen to Dust? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KA24DERT wrote: Aim assist is the worst thing to happen to this game. The game has always had it, except during Uprising 1.0-1.5 in which every competitive player fell back to using explosives or otherwise non-projectile oriented weaponry as...
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 13:44:00
|
460. One Extreme to another. - in General Discussions [original thread]
HMG can't do anything against a remote. Fat suits can't even walk away from them before they detonate its ridiculous. Assault suit with remotes right now shuts down the entire battlefield lol.
- by Himiko Kuronaga - at 2015.04.06 07:58:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |