| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1021. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Clone D wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Clone D...your logic makes sense assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum. The fact of the matter is that there are too many variables currently unknown to make an...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 08:28:00
|
1022. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: ^statistics can represent it, provided you're not using a flawed premise and flawed numbers from the start pretty much. its much better to start with observable statistics such as "i only seem to win 5% oof my games" ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 08:22:00
|
1023. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Clone D...your logic makes sense assuming spherical mercs in a vacuum. The fact of the matter is that there are too many variables currently unknown to make an assertion of a 50/50 chance...while I agr...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 08:16:00
|
1024. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: your premise is essentially dust is a game of chance, and can be calculated llike a game of chance, but its not a game of chance, it doesnt follow any of the rules that dominate chanced based events. and y...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 08:03:00
|
1025. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: math can only be done one way, thats why its a universal language, it only has one right answer. your techniques obviously ARNT usefull for forcasting and prediction becuas eyou cant figure out why your n...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 07:49:00
|
1026. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: ^Do not misrepresent my position to try and further your point. You are not accounting for enough variables, or the factors that people have told you about. If you are unsquadded it does not select an ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 07:19:00
|
1027. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: MINA Longstrike wrote: Clone D wrote: I couldn't care less what you believe. If you look at my post, it says "@Devs". I want a description of their algorithm from them. I really don't care what your comprehension level is. ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 07:17:00
|
1028. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
PROOF by your math there are two options win and lose. so you have a 50% chance of winning because winning is 50% of the available outicomes calculating on number of outcomes 100% devided by 2 (total options devided by number of options) so y u...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 07:00:00
|
1029. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: they do not have the same chance because YOU BEING THERE lowers the chancee of your team being organised becuas eyour chosing to be disorganised lowering your teams odds of sucess. this game isnt bassed o...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 06:52:00
|
1030. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: bionary options are NEVER 50/50 not even a coin flip due to the entropy principal functions may draw close to an asymptote, and we use the normal line as a description of the value that the function is ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 06:45:00
|
1031. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Clone D wrote: There is an equal chance that the team that I will be assigned to has organized squads, as the opposing team having organized squads. It is ra...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 06:41:00
|
1032. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Clone D wrote: There is an equal chance that the team that I will be assigned to has organized squads, as the opposing team having organized squads. It is random and by chance I should at least end u...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 06:35:00
|
1033. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: There is an equal chance that the team that I will be assigned to has organized squads, as the opposing team having organized squads. It is random and by chance I should at least end up on a team with the advantage 50% of the ...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 06:13:00
|
1034. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: FACTION WARFARE DOES NOT HAVE MATCHMAKING read You are wrong because two teams end up playing each other comprised of assorted individuals and squads. That i...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 04:51:00
|
1035. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: FACTION WARFARE DOES NOT HAVE MATCHMAKING read You are wrong because two teams end up playing each other comprised of assorted individuals and squads. That implies some match making process being use...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 04:44:00
|
1036. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: first yyour odds are only 50% if its a damn coin flip, but its not its a game where you have to doo something to win so nope no 50% odds for you. there is NO matchmaking in faction warfare, NONE, its bri...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 04:31:00
|
1037. Theoretically Win FW 50% Of Time - in General Discussions [original thread]
first yyour odds are only 50% if its a damn coin flip, but its not its a game where you have to doo something to win so nope no 50% odds for you. there is NO matchmaking in faction warfare, NONE, its bring a whole team with you or lose. speakin...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.04 04:24:00
|
1038. Can anyone get into Fac War? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Stop being FOTM chasers running GAl and Min and you'll see how fast you get in games. Yesterday the most i had to wait was 1 minute and 10 secs. (hehe im actually GLAD you ppl have to wait that much XD , SUffer...
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.03 16:04:00
|
1039. Can anyone get into Fac War? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: hour and a half now Still better than perpetual DEFEAT screens you make more LP than me
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.03 14:51:00
|
1040. Can anyone get into Fac War? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: I play Caldari/Amarr. Instant queue times, but constantly pitted against queue synced teams of protostompers. I'd love for some victories, even at the price of massive wait times. hour and a half now
- by Ghosts Chance - at 2014.12.03 14:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |