| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
61. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I think there is more to do with bad decisions than malicious capitalist greed in the development process personally. If Rattati had a louder voice a year ago, we'd have a thriving game right now. I disagree. The pro...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 12:17:00
|
62. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Not boxed. Make it F2P, but allow SP to be purchased. People would have been buying SP like mad. There was a time back in closed beta when the game actually was P2W. If CCP had not corrected it then, the game would not h...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 12:11:00
|
63. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: I think the FTP micro transaction, patch model is the future of all games. Of course it is, which is why we have a weekly cap and never got the SP rollover we were promised. It is also why CCP kept drastically alte...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 12:05:00
|
64. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Market value for a game runs at about $60, right. If SP were purchasable, I bet a slew of new players would pay their $60 to make some progress in the skill tree. Then, the fact that they spent some money on the game would keep...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:53:00
|
65. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: There are people out there with Flaylock proficiency 5. Let them keep it forever, as a mark that once, when the game had a chance of life, they chased the FOTM. The way that the skill tree is being r...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:47:00
|
66. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Sorry. This is the kind of thinking that caused the Dust 514 business model to FAIL. We have money. We want to pay. You're just not selling us what we want. CCP sells you a respec. You no longer need to buy boosters. You ...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:34:00
|
67. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: A lot of people don't have superfluous portions of SP. Imagine a beginner who spent their SP speccing into one skill and they were using it to their advantage, and subsequent to a skill tweak, they can no longer leverage that s...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:31:00
|
68. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: Regardless of how people pay, either with their time or with their money, any person deserves the right to choose which he/she wants to trade in order to progress in the game. No. No person playing a video game has a righ...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:26:00
|
69. This game is just... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Death Shadow117 wrote: Will we ever get a game changer. Community speak. No "no more client update" fags shut up and stop being assholes. You asked and answered your own question. Since you called the people who would tell you the tru...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:18:00
|
70. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Clone D wrote: [quote=Atiim] Respecs are in order any time ANY tweak is applied to the skill system. Respec with every patch? Someone give this guy the shaking the OP deserved.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:12:00
|
71. 44/1 in dom (youtube vid) - in General Discussions [original thread]
saxonmish wrote: Apothecary Za'ki wrote: dear OP.. as a logi I and my fellow Logistics brethren thank you for supplying us with many Warpoints fueling our squads orbitals and padding our own Warpoints higher then yours with F-all kills. /Za...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:10:00
|
72. CCP - $ for FULL SKILL RESPEC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ops Fox wrote: Please explain how that is in anyway pay to win? It is an advantage available only to those that pay money. Jesus, some peoples kids needed to be shaken more vigorously.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.09 11:03:00
|
73. Lets talk tanks CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: Also, I want CCP to acknowledge this thread & give some of their own insight. CCP gave their insights on vehicle design by first over nerfing, then overbuffing, then overnerfing again. They don't have any insi...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.03 22:07:00
|
74. Why This Game is Dying... - in General Discussions [original thread]
aaaasdff ertgfdd wrote: Pubs are healthy, prove me wrong. Shutting down of the oceanic servers. Less than 1000 people voting for CPM elections. No real development on the game anymore. It is not dying. It is dead.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.08.01 02:53:00
|
75. are there shield repair tools in eve... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Every good corp member has POSprey in their hangers somewhere.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 16:43:00
|
76. A-List Dusters - in General Discussions [original thread]
PoP SoTa wrote: Great, another list that makes people want to throw RE's at me all day. Any list that puts good players in the company of scrubs like Atiim and Charlotte is invalid.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 16:33:00
|
77. when is charlie? - in General Discussions [original thread]
PoP SoTa wrote: It's actually the way we keep wording it as a '**** you suck me' kinda statement that CCP doesn't like :3 But you get what ya deserve. Hey look at it this way, if they ban the account from the forums, I can biomass and re...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 16:27:00
|
78. when is charlie? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CUSE TOWN333 wrote: CCP Logibro wrote: Soon(ish).Gäó thats understandable as you can see people are excited about this game with the recent success of the past 2 hotfixs. if CCP approached balance from the beginning like it is now this gam...
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 16:25:00
|
79. when is charlie? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: *GBN gets banned* Yeah pretty much. Look up the last post by The Attorney General. CCP does not like people pointing out the obvious to them.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 16:20:00
|
80. CCP, deal with it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The game is seemingly going to be very heavily reliant on players to make it an enjoyable experience. Works fine in Eve.
- by GeneralButtNaked - at 2014.07.31 11:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |