| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
761. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: You cant just claim a planet that isnt gonna work especially a planet that might be ideal for a corp/small grp Also as others have stated u should wait a while and let the dust settle a bit before looking to do anythin...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.21 06:33:00
|
762. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
slap26 wrote: Veritas Vitae wrote: While I personally support the idea of a Academy planet, PFBHz holds an official no-involvement stance. As a mercenary corp we will go where people pay us to, so if we get paid to hit an Academy planet, we ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.21 02:24:00
|
763. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Free Beers wrote: a district only takes 16 to attack or defend. so we could put up 2 8v8 contacts at a time. We have impswarm members that would be happy to train against you sadly i doubt you would have 16 playe...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 22:32:00
|
764. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
DarkPrometheus wrote: the Federation Of Small Corporations will help defend for free. Do you even lift?
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 22:28:00
|
765. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fuzzy Jello wrote: THE GREY CARDINAL wrote: People need to chill out. If you are unhappy with the current memmbers then just remember that this is just an innitial intake of what CCP called a beta version of the CPM for DUST 514. If this is ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 18:53:00
|
766. Treaty of Hedaleolfarber III: Refuge of Academia - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I don't understand why people don't expect we can defend ourselves- we have multiple corps willing to def...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 18:24:00
|
767. Disappointed In CCP's CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
while I have to agree with Caeli that ccp went the wrong direction with vehicles in the worst way. I dont think that something cpm0 can change. CCP wants the cpm0 to act like the csm in which is provides HIGH level feedback and help with prioriti...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 15:18:00
|
768. Will the imperfects even be a factor in planetary conquest? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Does anyone here even lift?
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 05:52:00
|
769. Why the new Dust CSM is BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Just a small heads up for those who don't fly internet spaceships. The vibe from Eve is to still shut Dust 514 down. This is going to be this and all future CPM's most difficult fight in my opinion. The second most dif...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 05:13:00
|
770. Why the new Dust CSM is BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Ridiculous post, so they've played EVE, surely that would make them some of the best candidates? Look at what Kain has done with the tourneys he's setup, Jenza's charity feeds and such, IWS dedication to DUST seems quite a...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 05:11:00
|
771. CPM 0 : Message from Iron Wolf - in General Discussions [original thread]
I officially support cpm0 because ccp didn't pick idiots. Please dont prove me wrong
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 05:09:00
|
772. Why the new Dust CSM is BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: /me wonders if the fact 4/5 of the CPM uses forge guns effectively has any stature to opinion's of theory craters. It just means you are all bad at dust and need large targets to aim at.
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 02:48:00
|
773. Why the new Dust CSM is BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ca-Lo wrote: Free Beers wrote: Ca-Lo wrote: This is why I think the new Dust CSM is BS. Because most of its members are EVE players with long ties to EVE. What is my point? They are going to be looking out for the EVE interest more than...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 02:36:00
|
774. Why the new Dust CSM is BS! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ca-Lo wrote: This is why I think the new Dust CSM is BS. Because most of its members are EVE players with long ties to EVE. What is my point? They are going to be looking out for the EVE interest more than dust. That you can count on folks! T...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.20 02:30:00
|
775. MCC AFK Tribute video thanking CCP!!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
InsertCoinHere wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7gMRrjOGJd0 No CCP DEVS were harmed in the making of this video, this video was made to thank them for letting me have fun getting a free win, isk, and sp!!! and yes I was drunk when I mad...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 22:21:00
|
776. Leaderboard reset or seperate recent vs lifetime performance... - in General Discussions [original thread]
really? if ccp spends 1 hour on leaderboard/stats in the next year its 1 hour to much. Leave it turn it all off those are the options anything else is wasted dev resrouces
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 21:31:00
|
777. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight SoIaire wrote: Holy crap, CCP were actually going to do that? CCP needs to get their priorities straightened out. You should have been around when we found out about it. Pretty sure half of closed beta players quit that week. Ah...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 19:47:00
|
778. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: BMSTUBBY wrote: LOL at people thinking that the CPM is going to help CCP " shape the future of DUST 514 ". See that corp name under neath your avatar? Yeah that's our fault, and I regret it a small bit for causing ...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 19:20:00
|
779. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight SoIaire wrote: Free Beers wrote: Knight SoIaire wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Vethosis wrote: I don't agree with some of the CPM's. But I don't think they will be taken off because it would make the dust ppl who picked them look b...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 18:54:00
|
780. Issue with one of the appointed CPM - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight SoIaire wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Vethosis wrote: I don't agree with some of the CPM's. But I don't think they will be taken off because it would make the dust ppl who picked them look bad, unless someone makes a petition about some...
- by Free Beers - at 2013.04.19 18:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |