| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
581. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: Tanks are no more OP than dropships. Its a shame that tankers get all the fan mail lol i feel your pain because dropships suck. But tbh, tanks are better off than you guys. Dropships suck balls so hard
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 01:48:00
|
582. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Void Echo wrote: its a double standard and needs to be dealt with by the community.. the infantry believe they are entitled to everything, and they don't think anyone else should be as good as th...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 01:43:00
|
583. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Void Echo wrote: its a double standard and needs to be dealt with by the community.. the infantry believe they are entitled to everything, and they don't think anyone else should be as good as them. self entitled pric...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 01:42:00
|
584. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: its a double standard and needs to be dealt with by the community.. the infantry believe they are entitled to everything, and they don't think anyone else should be as good as them. self entitled pricks id like to look at t...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 01:40:00
|
585. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
straya fox wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this phenomena happen? Also, wasent attacking the AR assault, b...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 01:39:00
|
586. Its okay for infaintry to do well but not tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
When a tanker gos 30-0, its OP and needs to be nerfed. When an infantry player gos 30-0 (i.e. AR assault), its perfectly balanced. Why does this phenomena happen? Also, wasent attacking the AR assault, but its the most common fit for it. Alpha ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.16 00:48:00
|
587. Glory Days of No Murder Taxis - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Definitely has improved the game. There's only a few left, and they either refuse to accept the changes or are trying 1.4 for the first time and are screaming at their TV "WTF I TOTALLY GRAZED HIM WHERE'S MY +50?!". ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.11 19:42:00
|
588. Taking a break till 1.5 - in The Locker Room [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Kiiran-B wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: I do too, we had some good ones. Now their gone now, its aim assisted. No fun I take it chromosome wasn't fun either? chrome.... did not have an aimb...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.10 19:51:00
|
589. Nova Knifes and Nove Swords - An improvement on assassination! - in General Discussions [original thread]
weaboo
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.10 03:34:00
|
590. Taking a break till 1.5 - in The Locker Room [original thread]
Kiiran-B wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: I do too, we had some good ones. Now their gone now, its aim assisted. No fun I take it chromosome wasn't fun either? chrome.... did not have an aimbot? Chrome was the best build ever
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.10 00:21:00
|
591. Taking a break till 1.5 - in The Locker Room [original thread]
JL3Eleven wrote: <.< >.> Can I haz ur stuff? Yeah man! Has all the shield tanks and scout suits you like, youl be taking a break a too after a few matches with those x)
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 21:08:00
|
592. You Don't Like 1.4? CCP has this to say....... - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Government CheeseBurger wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q not a very good reply way to keep your playerbase. "we dont like the game" "well deal with it" *leaves* "I do...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 06:50:00
|
593. You Don't Like 1.4? CCP has this to say....... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Government CheeseBurger wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q not a very good reply way to keep your playerbase. "we dont like the game" "well deal with it" *leaves* EVE onlin...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 06:46:00
|
594. You Don't Like 1.4? CCP has this to say....... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Government CheeseBurger wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q not a very good reply way to keep your playerbase. "we dont like the game" "well deal with it" *leaves*
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 05:26:00
|
595. Lore vs gameplay validity? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Not everything translates well from eve into a shooter, for example the sensor nerf on shields would be massively negligible. Where in eve it will get you killed if your electronic footprint is the size of a titan and you...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 04:29:00
|
596. Lore vs gameplay validity? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: I agree, I mean an amarr assualt with shield recharge bonus? that doesn't make sense at all seeing as no amarrian ship is designed to even think about shields. Oh well I will wait until they release all the suits to make...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 04:27:00
|
597. why is evryone saying "WHY" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: Why do you want to know? jus tell us why
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 04:19:00
|
598. Lore vs gameplay validity? - in General Discussions [original thread]
how are the slots per race in Eve compared to the ones in dust? doesent look too good so far
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 04:15:00
|
599. Lore vs gameplay validity? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Magnus Amadeuss wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Gallante (armor) are the second most maneuverable and caldari (shields) are the most cumbersome on the subject of mobility. Altho shields are weightless and heavy armor is well, heavy, this was don...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 04:11:00
|
600. Lore vs gameplay validity? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gallante (armor) are the second most maneuverable and caldari (shields) are the most cumbersome on the subject of mobility. Altho shields are weightless and heavy armor is well, heavy, this was done to keep the lore balance in eve and dust. Thats...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.09.09 03:50:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |