| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
121. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: .... a proto medium maby. wow. Anyways, you realise there is NO OTHER anti infaintry weapon besides the very balanced shotty that can on...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 08:01:00
|
122. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: no it can one hit a proto suit with a charged shot, adding profficentcy 5 and one complex damage mod (99x3.5= 346.50 not counting the shield/armor difference. OR fire hip fire and crush that sui...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:59:00
|
123. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rei Shepard wrote: Quote: What is expescailly OP is a skilled played with an imperial like Addict Punk or Tiberius. Have you seen them? You die instantly. Thats pretty quick, and in the past you had a chance against them when they used anyth...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:57:00
|
124. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: .... a proto medium maby. wow. Anyways, you realise there is NO OTHER anti infaintry weapon besides the very balanced shotty that can one hit 400HP? Any Plasma Cannon, Thale's, Charged Sniper Rifle, An...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:48:00
|
125. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: calvin b wrote: It takes 2 seconds to charge it and in less than 3 shots you are dead and you are not calling this OP . If you say strafe and they will mi...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:45:00
|
126. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: A proto heavy no, a proto medium maybe but a scout yes it's completely fine. .... a proto medium maby. wow. Anyways, you realise there is NO OTHER anti infaintry weapon besides the very balanced shotty that can one hit...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:41:00
|
127. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: calvin b wrote: It takes 2 seconds to charge it and in less than 3 shots you are dead and you are not calling this OP . If you say strafe and they will miss I laugh at this one, thank...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:38:00
|
128. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: calvin b wrote: It takes 2 seconds to charge it and in less than 3 shots you are dead and you are not calling this OP . If you say strafe and they will mi...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:28:00
|
129. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: The ScR is way harder to use than the old TAR was; the overheat mechanic takes practice to work around, while mastering the old TAR was just 'skill to lv4 AR and rock out ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:27:00
|
130. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Fizzer94 wrote: calvin b wrote: It takes 2 seconds to charge it and in less than 3 shots you are dead and you are not calling this OP . If you say strafe and they will miss I laugh at this one,...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:22:00
|
131. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: The ScR is way harder to use than the old TAR was; the overheat mechanic takes practice to work around, while mastering the old TAR was just 'skill to lv4 AR and rock out with GLU'. ..... its the same exact weapon exc...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:19:00
|
132. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fizzer94 wrote: calvin b wrote: It takes 2 seconds to charge it and in less than 3 shots you are dead and you are not calling this OP . If you say strafe and they will miss I laugh at this one, thanks to aim assist the D*** suit is a magnet ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:17:00
|
133. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
wait, frizer said its being nerfed? Is this so? If it is, this thread is irrelevant x)
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:14:00
|
134. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: * 20% back and more vs shield You can shoot at shields all day long but if you cant get through the armor its pointless. * you will not overheat as long as your aim is true...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:11:00
|
135. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: * 20% back and more vs shield You can shoot at shields all day long but if you cant get through the armor its pointless. * you will not overheat as long as your aim is true So your saying player skill is OP? * not even ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 07:02:00
|
136. Reasons to go tank again? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SGT NOVA STAR wrote: wen we drive our new tanks for the first time on the 10th....weather bad or good, dont you wanna say "i was there!" if anyone can make it work, its all the guys in that honey badger chat. i mean, look how good some of us ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 06:51:00
|
137. Reasons to go tank again? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Cosgar wrote: Because CCP Wolfman designed the new vehicles. Never take His name in vain! If 10 months of anguish in the form of vehicle nerfs and AV buffs turns out to be nearly a year of hype and added disapointme...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 06:49:00
|
138. Reasons to go tank again? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SGT NOVA STAR wrote: i'll probably stick with my maddy just because it's all iv ever known, plus theres a whole community behind tankers. everyone can have a duvolle, but not everyone a beast tank. so bring on the shixxy ammo skill, bring on th...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 06:40:00
|
139. Reasons to go tank again? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Commander Tzu wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Why should we respec into tanks after they have been abused so hardcore in the last 10 months. Any reasons? Convince me. Sell it ;D Well, if you like blue or green then it's a no-brainer. Even if y...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 06:39:00
|
140. Comparing the current scrambler rifle to the orginal D TAC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Nocturnal Soul wrote: The DTAC is a replica of the real TAC a.k.a. the Scr stop your qq I think your agreeing and saying, yes, indeed, the current...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.11.21 06:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |