| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
101. Free isk. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Gimmie the ISK chump So I asked my dust buddies to pick a random # for me to be completely unbiased in this decision. I did not tell them what I needed the # for. They told me "666" the number of the beast. This thread d...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.15 23:54:00
|
102. Free isk. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Picking the winner soon. Post while you can.
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.15 22:27:00
|
103. 100mil ISK giveaway to first 10 posts. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I will be giving the isk away soon in my thread. I just got home from work. so many replies!
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.15 22:21:00
|
104. 100mil ISK giveaway to first 10 posts. - in General Discussions [original thread]
woo!
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.15 22:17:00
|
105. Free isk. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Giving away an unspecified amount of isk. Just post for a chance to qualify.
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.15 01:39:00
|
106. UI for Dust 514 in 2017 - in General Discussions [original thread]
not enough links to the booster market
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.14 19:54:00
|
107. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: I like the WP cost for vehicles. It doesnt have to be much, but it would justify the buffing of vehicles as they would be more 'valuable'. LAVs and DSs would keep their 'free' cost as some peop...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.14 19:16:00
|
108. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bump. This thread started off slow but It has really become quite interesting. I want the discussion to continue. Consider me intrigued.
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.09 17:24:00
|
109. CPM Judge Rhadamanthus is livestreaming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soraya Xel wrote: Major 0nslaught wrote: Cpm has proven again and again that they cannot be trusted. Where has CPM1 let you down so far? Soraya ruined my life!
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.09 17:14:00
|
110. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: Just from Ambush, not the game. Why is it such a huge thing that us infantry just want a game mode we can go into without having to p**s about dodging a python missile spamming. the devs have said they can't split amb/om...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 16:15:00
|
111. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
SgtMajSquish MLBJ wrote: Bethhy wrote: Turret Structures getting a health buff was a start... It lets tankers have a place of contention.. And some time and an actual need if a turret is manned as it can wreck an entire area... The proble...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 09:33:00
|
112. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Turret Structures getting a health buff was a start... It lets tankers have a place of contention.. And some time and an actual need if a turret is manned as it can wreck an entire area... The problem? Turrets are put in some o...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 09:32:00
|
113. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bethhy wrote: Soul *\o/* Hi.
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 09:03:00
|
114. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
sir RAVEN WING wrote: Surprised True hasn't came climbing out of his golden HAV dreams. Here, let me give you a reason. ADS: To destroy uplinks and those who will lay more. DS: To transport players from A to B and sometimes to R. (Rooftops ...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 09:00:00
|
115. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Sure tanks don't currently have a role. This doesn't mean they shouldn't have one. That is also why I asked what tankers believe their role in the battlefield should be.
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 08:57:00
|
116. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TIGER SHARK1501 wrote: Djinn SouI wrote: All of these responses and I still have not received any answers to my questions... I bolded them for a reason. I am giving you guys a chance to state your case. If this is the best all of you can do ...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 07:31:00
|
117. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joel II X wrote: I dodged a few words here and there and just went for the bold words, and stopped when I read "vehiclists". Um, no. "Operative" should be used when speaking (or, in this case, typing) about different type of vehicle users. ...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 07:16:00
|
118. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ace Boone wrote: ADS play a key in removing high-ground presence, keeping AV busy and being pesky as **** to deal with. LAVs get people from point to point in pubs. Tanks are pretty much useless. You only use tanks to kill other tanks or to h...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 07:15:00
|
119. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: Djinn SouI wrote: Quasar Storm wrote: Djinn SouI wrote: All of these responses and I still have not received any answers to my questions... I bolded them for a reason. I am giving you guys a chance to state ...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 07:15:00
|
120. Why all vehicles should be removed.. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Quasar Storm wrote: Djinn SouI wrote: All of these responses and I still have not received any answers to my questions... I bolded them for a reason. I am giving you guys a chance to state your case. If this is the best all of you can do the...
- by Djinn SouI - at 2015.01.06 06:46:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |