| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. LOL, 2 weeks on Vacation and HotFix Bravo comes out... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ummm.... you obviously haven't faced any good tankers if all of them are too easy... i dont lose very often to ONE AV guy. Only time that happens is when im derpin around trying to ram an RE guy
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 23:57:00
|
122. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Does anyone have a valid argument against this? Rattati even said that client side updates are possible now, so why not? **** vehicle reintroduction. GImme Amarr HAV! PS: Sorry Darth but I want my A...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 23:52:00
|
123. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Does anyone have a valid argument against this? Rattati even said that client side updates are possible now, so why not?
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 23:49:00
|
124. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Requesting a blue tag on this.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 15:26:00
|
125. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
low genius wrote: title is cancelled. move on. No, the title is not canceled. I still have fun with it, and I will play it until it is shut offline. Which definetly will not happen until legion drops
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 02:21:00
|
126. Hot fix Charlie wish list - in General Discussions [original thread]
(Sorry for the spam everyone) We need our vehicle variants in Charlie. That's what should happen.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:55:00
|
127. Atiim I like your sig...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: I will provide the Amarr Empire spying services into the Gallente Federation, as well as waging war on the Slaves. That is a commendable attitude.....but I cannot condone the use of espionage, the Pra...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:42:00
|
128. Tbh tanks aren't OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
JARREL THOMAS wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: We need our vehicle variants back. That's what Charlie should be about. Ya damn right If you haven't already, feel free to contribute to my thread, the Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition. We w...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:31:00
|
129. Atiim I like your sig...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I will provide the Amarr Empire spying services into the Gallente Federation, as well as waging war on the Slaves.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:27:00
|
130. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
This is what Charlie should be about. If they can't do it for Charlie for some odd reason then Delta, at the latest.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:23:00
|
131. Atiim I like your sig...... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Forums are entertaining because of people like you....
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:16:00
|
132. Tbh tanks aren't OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
We need our vehicle variants back. That's what Charlie should be about.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 01:08:00
|
133. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Vulpes Dolosus wrote: I do not want Logistic vehicles without proper and viable logistic modules and/or turrets to make them actual support vehicles. Not just tankier versions of STD frames. I'd like a return of the Shield/Arm...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 00:49:00
|
134. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: DarthJT5 wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I believe their removal was about rethinking vehicle roles, obviously black ops HAVs, marauders, and enforcers weren't working as intended, so they were all removed in tu...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 00:23:00
|
135. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Michael Arck wrote: I say no because what's the use when they will just be complained about and nerfed into nothing anyway by the community? Again, another situation where community cried nerf and then changes their mind later on, completely f...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 00:15:00
|
136. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright so come on guys, tell anyone you know who agrees with this to sign this petition. CCP needs to see this.
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.23 00:03:00
|
137. nuevos reclutas para esta nueva y completa corporacion - in General Discussions [original thread]
RAPTOR ALPHA wrote: https://dust514.com/recruit/w97COE/ Ummm... These are the English forums btw..
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.22 23:59:00
|
138. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I believe their removal was about rethinking vehicle roles, obviously black ops HAVs, marauders, and enforcers weren't working as intended, so they were all removed in turn. I never saw a black ...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.22 23:56:00
|
139. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: I believe their removal was about rethinking vehicle roles, obviously black ops HAVs, marauders, and enforcers weren't working as intended, so they were all removed in turn. I never saw a black ops HAV in the field (pr...
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.22 23:51:00
|
140. The Official Vehicle Re-introduction Petition - in General Discussions [original thread]
This could also be combined with the re-introduction of vehicle mods. Heat sinks, chassis, Rechargers, supplemental stuff etc. CCP said all of this would return months ago, never heard anything since
- by DarthJT5 - at 2014.06.22 23:38:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |