Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
381. bolt pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
maluble wrote: RemingtonBeaver wrote: I love the bolt pistol. That being said...it's OP as ****. You can OHK any light suit at a ridiculous range. I love it for that reason. I know it'll be nerfed. Aim assist plus hip fire...bye bye ...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.09 00:13:00
|
382. The troll war against King Thunderbolt has began!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CommanderBolt wrote: How can you not admire KingThunderBolt's tenacity. What an interesting social experiment this whole internet / EVE universe is. oh noes guys king is here on his alt.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 23:06:00
|
383. Never deploying - in General Discussions [original thread]
sorry ccp forgot to feed scotty's hamster so he's running on fumes.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 22:46:00
|
384. The troll war against King Thunderbolt has began!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
what do you do? whats your objective? do you think hell give a ****? will he blame all of this on lag and cheating?
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:59:00
|
385. An idea - in General Discussions [original thread]
IDC as long as ferroscales have no/minimal db addition.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:52:00
|
386. If Wanted to Tell Someone To **** OFF, Who Would it be - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nothing Certain wrote: There is a long list and a short list. The long list is too long, the short list is tankers who jump out of their tank to kill you. Are you certain ?
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:48:00
|
387. If Wanted to Tell Someone To **** OFF, Who Would it be - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: People who say Swarm Launchers are OP, and crybaby ADS Pilots. And pretty much every tanker I've ever talked to (except True Adamance, Ciscko & Echo). swarms are for pussies dah dah dah ooohhh swarms.... are... for... puuuss...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:41:00
|
388. o7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Heavy spam is pretty bad.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:37:00
|
389. More BPO's in near future? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa Senpai wrote: CommanderBolt wrote: SoTa Senpai wrote: Hell yea! This is what this game needs - more BPO! Who needs content anyways when we can all have BPO's!!!!! Yay, more threads about BPOs! MAKE THEM NOW!!!! Who cares about any...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.08 21:24:00
|
390. Reasons why Dust is better than Destiny - in General Discussions [original thread]
Diablo 3 is better than both in all aspects.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.07 18:56:00
|
391. Ten Years of World of Warcraft [Thread is actually about DUST] - in General Discussions [original thread]
Leadfoot10 wrote: Anytime I'm chatting with someone in-game and they bring up balance. I ask one simple question: "What FPS have you played that's completely balanced?" I've yet to receive a good answer. fallout 3
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.07 17:27:00
|
392. Do the Devs even play their own game? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rattati does but i think the onky other one would be archeduke but he is a gm.
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.06 21:04:00
|
393. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: swarms ar for pussies real men use particle cannons and forges. Yes, because parking atop a hill with 7000+ eHP and a Particle Cannon is hard-mode and totally not cowardly. And camping with a Tanke...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.05 15:01:00
|
394. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: even though thay made no sense what so ever just some butthurt scrub ranting because his op weapon will only get poi...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.04 17:14:00
|
395. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sclompton Face-Smasher wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: even though thay made no sense what so ever just some butthurt scrub ranting because his op weapon will only get points for kills. If they take away the damage then anti tankers won...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.04 15:47:00
|
396. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
H0riz0n Unlimit wrote: On my alt i have 36 milion sp and have 4 different role at full proto, on tanker i have 26 milion and the only thing i have that is not vehicle is an adv reptool, i cant use vehicle ability for all the dropsuits i dont ha...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.04 14:43:00
|
397. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: Atiim wrote: Juno Tristan wrote: your point was tanks dictate the engagement at any practical location at any time, I am saying this is not the case. Roof top forges are a valid mechanic Can an AV...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.04 14:33:00
|
398. Should Vehicle Damage no longer give WP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
RemingtonBeaver wrote: I can solo scrub tankers and pilots. Anyone with any skill however can get the hell out of my line of sight or lock on range. AV players used to get nothing for WP and being an AV player was thankless job. It has to be ...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.04 14:28:00
|
399. CCP Logic, guys please look at yourselves. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TH1EFOFSOuLS wrote: Quote: 8) V/AV, this is a longer standing issue. Let's just work together to make it fun for everyone. ] You need to get people or at least motivate them to spec into their own vehicles as I always say nothing kills a...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.03 22:55:00
|
400. CCP Logic, guys please look at yourselves. - in General Discussions [original thread]
postapo wastelander wrote: CharacterNameWasTaken wrote: Cheydinhal Guard wrote: I agree with you on the sidearms, but I still don't understand why the ScP (aside from the Breach variant) took such a huge damage nerf for no absolute reason...
- by CharacterNameWasTaken - at 2014.10.03 22:49:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [20] 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |