| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1141. Nerf the Flaylock pistol - in General Discussions [original thread]
Taeryn Frost wrote: Hmm, not quite on topic, but for the ones who say you can't be one shotted. I just got roased by a militia MD that listed the damage received as 1300ish....so hmm. That's total damage dealt, not from one shot. Oh, and ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 03:18:00
|
1142. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Ok, read the rest of the sentence please. It's not a tautology, I was merely defining the acronym OP for clarity. Is that OK? I might have judged too ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 03:05:00
|
1143. Give me a reason to NOT give you 10000 isk - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dr Allopathy wrote: go. Because the minimum you can give is 50k.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 02:45:00
|
1144. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: So much bad logic, I really hope CCP doesn't listen to a word you're saying buster. No offense. Look, ZDub, you're entitled to your opinion like the rest of us. No offense taken. Having said that, the logic is pretty sound.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 02:35:00
|
1145. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vin Vicious wrote: Jeb Kermman wrote: Vin Vicious wrote: Just because a gun isn't used by everyone doesn't mean it's not OP, I just debunked your whole thread that you prob took 1-2hours to make, which means I'm OP /thread Actually ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 02:27:00
|
1146. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Putting Cruxio's data together with mine, we have: Assault Rifle215 Vehicle/Installations155 Sniper Rifle139 Submachinegun54 HMG51 Grenades/RE46 Mass Driver44 Flaylock Pistol36 Strike29 Forge Gun25 Scrambler Rifle20 Swarm Launcher13 Shotgun11 Las...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 02:20:00
|
1147. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Ok, read the rest of the sentence please. It's not a tautology, I was merely defining the acronym OP for clarity. Is that OK? I might have judged too quick there, mea culpa. So i take it this is th...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 02:06:00
|
1148. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dr Allopathy wrote: There isn't enough data compiled here in order to generate statistics with relatively low error. True, as I've pointed out at the bottom of the OP, I'd like more data. This is starting from a point of facts though, rathe...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:56:00
|
1149. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cruxio wrote: Buster Friently wrote: So, I've seen, and commented on, the typical "it's not AR so nerf it posts" and have tried to explain that just because something kills you, but isn't an AR, that doesn't mean it's OP. Totals for all fo...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:50:00
|
1150. This game requires no talent. - in General Discussions [original thread]
JETSTORM1090 wrote: Did he just right us an essay?!? I think you're looking for the word "write".
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:24:00
|
1151. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: What is your definition of op? Here you go : https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=75585 Please excuse my ...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:20:00
|
1152. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arrach Sarkal wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness ... I have compiled the killfeed from four skirmish games today in which I dropped alone. I removed my own kills from the tally. Data is not the plural of...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:08:00
|
1153. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Sorry about the alt posting again. For the record, Jeb is me. I'm not sure why the setting keeps changing. Sorry for any confusion. What is your defin...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 01:07:00
|
1154. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xender17 wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Xender17 wrote: Buster Friently wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Please everyone... Just ignore this guy. Don't even bother posting in this thread, just let it die. Why is that? You don't like what the ac...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 00:47:00
|
1155. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Sorry about the alt posting again. For the record, Jeb is me. I'm not sure why the setting keeps changing. Sorry for any confusion. What is your definition of op? Here you go : https://forums.du...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 00:29:00
|
1156. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sorry about the alt posting again. For the record, Jeb is me. I'm not sure why the setting keeps changing. Sorry for any confusion.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.08 00:03:00
|
1157. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jathniel wrote: General purpose weapons will likely always have the most kills. Balance is lacking when a weapon, ANY weapon, can't fulfill it's role (plasma cannon, laser rifle). OR, supplants the role of another weapon of a particular niche(...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:55:00
|
1158. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Over used =/= over powered Sorry you are not a winner, please try again It does because to be OP, a weapon must hurt overall diversity. Like the AR.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:52:00
|
1159. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bob Teller wrote: Wepons that are used more are not op,they are just used more...That is some twisted way to try to (prove) that the flaylock is not OP.This sure show how people get attached to their precious op guns and are willing to do anyth...
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:50:00
|
1160. Actual Data for OP weapon use and OPness - in General Discussions [original thread]
First Prophet wrote: Unless you go and get an actually decent sample size, this data is completely useless. Please feel free to provide better data. Until then, this is the best we have.
- by Buster Friently - at 2013.07.07 23:49:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |