| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
241. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: even against a blaster or missile in close quarters a rail still wins. Rails are AV. They should win against blasters and missiles when it comes to AV. I'm even inclined to say that blast...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.14 07:24:00
|
242. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
bumpy.
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.14 06:10:00
|
243. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: in PC proto forges still **** me the **** off and end up making the other tank win in a tank v tank fight. AV is still there. but i do agree points for vehicle damage would make it a lot better. i ...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.14 03:40:00
|
244. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
HiddenBrother wrote: I'm sure Bob was in another thread; stating how OP his tank hardeners were. That may be the opinion of anyone who sits in a tank, and absorbs a few volleys of militia swarms. Then you get hit by ProtoSwarms/Forge, Railgun ...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.14 01:33:00
|
245. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
medomai grey wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: Luk Manag wrote: What about the rail needs to be changed? Also, do you know if there is anything that prevents me from running multiple damage amps at the same time? If I activate 2 or 3 at...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.14 01:31:00
|
246. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: There's no risk vs reward to tanking, and you can hop into it with basically no SP investment on your part to speak of. It's stupid right now because there isn't even a point to killing the tank other than to stop him getting ...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 22:55:00
|
247. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: The cost itself doesn't really matter. However there should be an actual consequence to losing HAVs, similar to how there is a consequence to losing a PRO dropsuit. This super low price currently does nothing but encourage vehic...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 22:50:00
|
248. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luk Manag wrote: What about the rail needs to be changed? Also, do you know if there is anything that prevents me from running multiple damage amps at the same time? If I activate 2 or 3 at the same time, is there a stacking penalty for the da...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 22:44:00
|
249. I suck at tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
i use a 2 rep maddy, but as of now i am trying out the 2 hardener maddy. i suspect both will have their ups and downs.
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 22:38:00
|
250. Now that i'm getting used to 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks are not OP. Saying it right now whether u agree or not. doesn't matter read either way. Tanks are cheap and even milita tanks r effective, and are easily good enough to beat a better tank. It's about the same difference from milita to std...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 22:30:00
|
251. 1.7 thoughts - in General Discussions [original thread]
my tanks to weak. buff it please. i want to fly have tactical nukes and repel all shots back at enemys dealing 100 times the damage to them. i also want the ability to cloak and go underground. yes.
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 06:07:00
|
252. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: i only use 1 hardener now. why use more? Lol. my 330 rep a sec tank is much more effective than 180 reps a sec with 2 hards. want to know why. because my tanks reps r insane. Bro. O_o Becau...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 01:38:00
|
253. Tank vs AV: In my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
i only use 1 hardener now. why use more? Lol. my 330 rep a sec tank is much more effective than 180 reps a sec with 2 hards. want to know why. because my tanks reps r insane. Bro. O_o
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.13 01:33:00
|
254. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Atiim wrote: I don't know. But what I do know is that I can make a Sica in 10 seconds that can both withstand PRO AV, while also being the best AV. I do know how...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 23:11:00
|
255. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Proper fits run up to 490k, but you can reduce that. do u run armor or shield tanks? Got them both maxed out brah. You can't have only one. onl...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:57:00
|
256. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Atiim wrote: I don't know. But what I do know is that I can make a Sica in 10 seconds that can both withstand PRO AV, while also being the best AV. I do know however that I am going to have some fun times with my Sica...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:52:00
|
257. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Proper fits run up to 490k, but you can reduce that. do u run armor or shield tanks?
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:50:00
|
258. I haven't played 1.7 yet - in General Discussions [original thread]
avg tanks per game is 4. most of the time is 6. :D so good to see vehicles in dust. unlike before.
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:49:00
|
259. Tank cost vs Infantry cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
a fully fitetd tank for me is 450k isk.
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:47:00
|
260. Tanks are meant to wreck you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: The Attorney General wrote: I personally invested into tanks because my corp needed another tanker for PC. I took an ALT(because I wasn't pissing away my main) and specced him into tanks when uprising hit. I stuck it out beca...
- by BobThe 844-1 CakeMan - at 2013.12.12 22:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |