Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1701. 1.7 Actually has lots of good stuff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Not Me.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 01:01:00
|
1702. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: You do know you can strafe a blaster by walking left or right, it can't track you fast enough unlike rails which can hit a moving LAV twice in quick succession so you finally got a turret to shoot at you a...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:45:00
|
1703. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Atiim wrote: Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything outside of CQC. This mean's that it is quite possible, and with a little bit of e...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:42:00
|
1704. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
You do know you can strafe a blaster by walking left or right, it can't track you fast enough unlike rails which can hit a moving LAV twice in quick succession so you finally got a turret to shoot at you and ran as far as you could while remaining...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:30:00
|
1705. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: DUST Fiend wrote: Turret AI OP Go take a Blaster Maddy into a fight at 550m and tell me how that works out for you Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything o...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:22:00
|
1706. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Turret AI OP Go take a Blaster Maddy into a fight at 550m and tell me how that works out for you You beat me to it.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.04 00:20:00
|
1707. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zero Harpuia wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: SILVERBACK 02 wrote: the only thing that should be able to take out a tank is... ANOTHER TANK do you agree? personally i agree.. i think tanks should be a dominating presence on the battlefie...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 23:55:00
|
1708. red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: How dare a long range attack vehicle, obviously designed to only kill other vehicles at range kill a vehicle at range!!! He hould have driven into the center of the map, got out his tank a tried using AV nades on your pyt...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:36:00
|
1709. PS3 sent for repairs (again) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alldin Kan wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Chances are it's still going to be busted and I'll have to get a PS4 too early. If it comes to that then I'll be giving out 250,000,000 ISK to the needy peasants how you going to...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:23:00
|
1710. f5 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I pressed f5 and then I face palmed.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:22:00
|
1711. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Atiim wrote: If you LOLTank Brigadiers want to be the only viable counter to yourselves, then fine. But you can't be effective at killing infantry then. This isn't World Of Tanks. And we aren't turning this into Tank ...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:20:00
|
1712. Best Player You've Ever Seen - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: You humans are silly. I win automatically because I'm a cat. LOL
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:19:00
|
1713. PS3 sent for repairs (again) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ISK now. Me need ISK for tanks
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.03 00:12:00
|
1714. Nerfing, Buffing, and Rebalancing A guide for forumeers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bumpety Bump Bump
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.01 20:46:00
|
1715. 20,000 YEARS IN THE FUTURE AND I CANT JUMP OVER A 1 FOOT FENCE - in General Discussions [original thread]
20,000 years into the future and tanks instantly explode when they run over a pebble.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.01 20:43:00
|
1716. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KalOfTheRathi wrote: The most consistent QQ Kitten burst of pure emotion from tankers is ISK. As in a 1.4M ISK tank should not be taken out by a 147K ISK something that is not a tank. Which is utter bullshit. I have trouble with kids of a cer...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.01 20:16:00
|
1717. TANK combat. - in General Discussions [original thread]
AV should be used to take out retreating tanks (basically a tank with It's mods off) Coordinated AV 4 guys or more millions into AV hitting the tank simultaneously AV should give your teams tank the edge it needs to win a tank battle DS should b...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.01 03:51:00
|
1718. Anti-Vehicle CPM Representation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: ZeHealingHurts HurtingHeals wrote: I thought Judge was also specced extensively into AV on alts? I'm also specced into HAVs. Should I be apart of the CPM on vehicles? (Not saying Judge is incapable, in fact he's quite the ...
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.12.01 03:04:00
|
1719. Since Swarms are being nerfed so much... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Um no.
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.11.29 22:50:00
|
1720. I am now your new king - in General Discussions [original thread]
Think you posted that you were streaming and when you were done I clicked on a random one of your video's ^^
- by Benjamin Ciscko - at 2013.11.29 22:32:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |