| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
9021. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: Atiim wrote: knight of 6 wrote: Atiim wrote: knight of 6 wrote: is the assault rifle a cqc weapon? they are both blasters. why the kitten would you have a cqc weapon on a tank? "I really wanna utilize those tight...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:55:00
|
9022. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: dude your obviously not a tanker. if you actually had a tank, you would realize how stupid you sound. you have hated tanks ever since you came on the forums. So many assumptions made there, and yet all of them are false.
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:53:00
|
9023. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: for vehicles there is dropoff damage. its useless as a HMG at about 200 meters. get your **** straight. but I would never expect a AVer like you to do that LOL Facts straight? Coming from a tanker who believes that PRO ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:47:00
|
9024. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
chase rowland wrote: Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Atiim wrote: Yes, but some are under the impression that it is quite literally impossible to use a Blaster in anything outside of CQC. This mean's that it is quite possible, an...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:43:00
|
9025. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shotty GoBang wrote: Atiim wrote: Or I could just run my Mass Driver with prof V and a complex damage mod. And A Duvolle Active Scanner. On my logi INB4 Atiim relates this post to Mass Drivers ... nope ... too late. What's Atiim's M...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:38:00
|
9026. Friendly Fire and AV Grenades - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'd be my ultimate payback against the LTBG
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:24:00
|
9027. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Farsund Solheim wrote: I used to get kills quite easily at ~260 meters with my Vayu and stabilized blaster . That was before almost everyone had a proto AV fit. Now my enforcers get popped far too easily. tis sad. On a side note, could you po...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 14:14:00
|
9028. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
I do believe that SGs should do more damage, but I think that 3x more damage is a bit too much. We have to remember that they are still niche weapons, and then there is Mr Heavy to think about. He should be able to survive a good shot or to with ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:49:00
|
9029. what if you could bookmark fw planets? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or we could bring things back like they used to be. I remember being able to find a specific battle on the Starmap and Que-up for that battle. That way I got to pick which battle I wanted to fight and where I wanted to fight. Though to be fair, t...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:46:00
|
9030. CCP... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please Don't
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:37:00
|
9031. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: You're turning a bug around and using it to your advantage, slandering tankers. Nobody likes you. You may leave now. Coming from somebody who's even been told to both "STFU" and "HTFU" by other tankers multiple times in...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:35:00
|
9032. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Foundation Seldon wrote: Atiim wrote: Sounds personal. And what happens if I just upgrade my core skills? Any tanker worth his salt should have plenty of CPU for things like that. Missiles are my favorite turrets are Missiles, and I don't ...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:31:00
|
9033. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: Atiim wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: So I assume that you were trying to point out that installations are OP still? If so, old news, just ignore them, and CCP will eventually fix them. If not, get out,...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:26:00
|
9034. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Booby Tuesdays wrote: Atiim wrote: Booby Tuesdays wrote: Atiim wrote: Or I could just run my Mass Driver with prof V and a complex damage mod. And A Duvolle Active Scanner. On my logi You will still get shredded by a Duvolle or...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:22:00
|
9035. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: True Adamance wrote: Same Shield tanks look so much cooler. As long as it looks better than the Soma, it's alright in my book. Everything look better than dirty Gallente ****....they just don't opera...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:10:00
|
9036. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Booby Tuesdays wrote: Atiim wrote: Or I could just run my Mass Driver with prof V and a complex damage mod. And A Duvolle Active Scanner. On my logi You will still get shredded by a Duvolle or Militia AR before you get the third shot...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:09:00
|
9037. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shotty GoBang wrote: RECON BY FIRE wrote: The shotgun can, without damage mods, 2 shot most suits in the game and 3 shot everything but the max hp stacked heavies. Learn to aim scrubs. Shouldn't take 3 shots to drop a Medium Frame. Totall...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:04:00
|
9038. To CCP Wolfman: Triple Shotgun Damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
Or I could just run my Mass Driver with prof V and a complex damage mod. And A Duvolle Active Scanner. On my logi
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:01:00
|
9039. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: Benjamin Ciscko wrote: Yes and I backed over a madrugar and instapopped literally in half a second I dropped all of his armor. If missiles were meant for armor tanks they would have more PG they should n...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 04:00:00
|
9040. To Those Who Believe Large Blasters Are CQC - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Message from Godin: So I assume that you were trying to point out that installations are OP still? If so, old news, just ignore them, and CCP will eventually fix them. If not, get out, you're being a ******* child. No, I'...
- by Atiim - at 2013.12.04 03:55:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |