| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
672
   |
Posted - 2013.08.04 21:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Me vs a Gunnlogi is like a Sherman vs a Panzer IV
Not sure I am following your comparison correctly.
Don't you drive Sica's? So wouldn't it be more of a Pz IV vs Panther comparison? |
First Prophet
Valor Company Incorporated
756
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 21:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Scheneighnay McBob wrote:I remember when vehicle shield tanking was considered superior, just like with infantry.
Don't remember what happened.
Codex build, all you ever saw were swarms of shield HAVs with missiles. I know for sure missiles got nerfed.
Next build, it was all armor HAVs with hybrid turrets. now its armor + rail, don't have the survivability to go into battle directly
Rails are still hybrid turrets. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
6939
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 21:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Me vs a Gunnlogi is like a Sherman vs a Panzer IV Not sure I am following your comparison correctly. Don't you drive Sica's? So wouldn't it be more of a Pz IV vs Panther comparison?
In WW2 Shermans had a problem defeating 'any' panzer back then. The only reason why shermans won any tank fights then was sheer numbers and opportunity in use.
I feel my sica or soma is in a similar position I can bearly break the Gunlogi before they split my tank in half |
The Attorney General
ZionTCD
672
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 21:52:00 -
[34] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:
In WW2 Shermans had a problem defeating 'any' panzer back then. The only reason why shermans won any tank fights then was sheer numbers and opportunity in use.
I feel my sica or soma is in a similar position I can bearly break the Gunlogi before they split my tank in half
It was my understanding that PZ IV's, especially pre- Ausf F2's were not vastly superiour to a Sherman save for their slightly lower profile and slightly better gun(post Ausf F2 only).
A Sherman was capable of penetrating a PZ IV, even Ausf. G's at decent ranges, and could even penetrate Panthers if a lower glacis shot was available. Beyond that, the Sherman was faster, arguably more reliable, and had faster turret traverse IIRC.
Shermans were capable versus Pz IV's, just not against Panthers and Tigers. |
ZDub 303
TeamPlayers
EoN.
1472
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 22:14:00 -
[35] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Its a big argument that needs to be resolved by thier game design overall. I would love to see more support actions giving rewards outside of helping win (but the fact its not recorded action means you don't get paid at end of fight)
I would hate to see a third 'point' system pop up to separate actions and payout and rewards but it may come down to that... :(
Take a lesson from MAG,
Put it on a timer. Most balanced way I've seen OMS done in any FPS.
1 'OMS Point' per second per member of the squad. 1800 points required for OB (5m for 6 person squad) |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |