|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2120
   |
Posted - 2013.08.02 22:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Moochie Cricket wrote:Python is better if you can master it
100% disagree.
In my experience most newb pilots fly caldari, most vets fly gallente.
It's a bit easier to fit a Python for survival initially, but once you have a good grasp on the intricacies of piloting and can offset some of the drawback of the gallente ships through piloting skill, the incubus has the better fitting arrangement as far as specialization and versatility.
I'd give you guys my fittings, but considering how many pilots I consistenty destroy with my incubus I think I'd rather just watch the rest of you continue to struggle and drink in your sweet sweet tears. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2162
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 23:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
I still say an Incubus is on equal footing with a Python in Air-to-Air engagements. What exactly makes you guys think the Python is superior in this situation? The speed difference? IME, the speed difference is negligible; especially when considering that the Incubus is a more stable platform, which allows for more precise gunning. And if you're fitting specifically for speed, the Incubus is the faster ship.
For me personally the Incubus is the better choice in almost every situation, but objectively I just don't see any reason to say that the Python is more suited for a2a than the Incubus.
It makes more sense to simply say that the Python is more nimble, but has the less fitting options and less tank.
As far as pure speed, the most speed-tanked Incubus is FASTER than the most speed-tanked Python. |
Baal Roo
Subdreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
2162
|
Posted - 2013.08.04 23:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
Azura Sakura wrote:Baal Roo wrote:I still say an Incubus is on equal footing with a Python in Air-to-Air engagements. What exactly makes you guys think the Python is superior in this situation? The speed difference? IME, the speed difference is negligible; especially when considering that the Incubus is a more stable platform, which allows for more precise gunning. And if you're fitting specifically for speed, the Incubus is the faster ship.
For me personally the Incubus is the better choice in almost every situation, but objectively I just don't see any reason to say that the Python is more suited for a2a than the Incubus.
It makes more sense to simply say that the Python is more nimble, but has the less fitting options and less tank.
As far as pure speed, the most speed-tanked Incubus is FASTER than the most speed-tanked Python. Missle do more damage to armor and not so much to shields.
True, but it's also easier to fit more eHP onto an Incubus, which pretty much makes it a wash in my experience. |
|
|
| |
|