|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
352
   |
Posted - 2013.08.01 05:50:00 -
[1] - Quote
Two different styles of FPS. Dust you can run around with your head cut off and do decent with all the scrubs around and it being a tracker shooter. You can escape a lot of encounters.
BF3 is a twitch shooter - meaning if your enemy sees you your basically dead if you didn't see them first. You can't run out in the open and you have to consider moving slowly more often then quickly.
|
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
352
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 05:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Two different styles of FPS. Dust you can run around with your head cut off and do decent with all the scrubs around and it being a tracker shooter. You can escape a lot of encounters.
BF3 is a twitch shooter - meaning if your enemy sees you your basically dead if you didn't see them first. You can't run out in the open and you have to consider moving slowly more often then quickly.
I dont think they are that much different from each other really. What do people do sometimes in DUST when taking corners or being shot at. *bunny hop* Why bunny hop? *harder to hit because twitchy movement.
If you don't see them as different you should stop giving your opinions on FPS that you clearly know nothing of. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
355
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 05:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Anita Hardone wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Two different styles of FPS. Dust you can run around with your head cut off and do decent with all the scrubs around and it being a tracker shooter. You can escape a lot of encounters.
BF3 is a twitch shooter - meaning if your enemy sees you your basically dead if you didn't see them first. You can't run out in the open and you have to consider moving slowly more often then quickly.
I dont think they are that much different from each other really. What do people do sometimes in DUST when taking corners or being shot at. *bunny hop* Why bunny hop? *harder to hit because twitchy movement. If you don't see them as different you should stop giving your opinions on FPS that you clearly know nothing of. The gameplay modes are essentially the same. Both feature vehicles with different roles including aircraft. Both feature builds that tailor to certain modes of game play whether its supporting or attacking. Explain to me what is so different between the two.
I... already did?
Ones a Twitch Shooter...
The other is Tracker... |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
355
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:I... already did? Ones a Twitch Shooter... The other is Tracker...
And i debunked it...[/quote]
No - you just mentioned the similarities of weapons, vehicles, objectives. You didn't touch upon that in BF3 one swipe of your gun blazing = 3 people dead. Try that in dust and you'll just spread out damage and ultimately do nothing.
I don't see why you can't comprehend the difference between Twitch and Tracker - so I'm just going to stop replying. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
362
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:demonkiller 12 wrote:
no they dont, seriously stop talking out your ass, even with select fire the FAMAS is **** at range because it does **** all damage at any range, all it has going is its 1000ROF with makes it purely good at close range and ok with burst at medium - its still going to lose to that noob with the AN94
http://symthic.com/bf3-weapon-comparison?wep1=FAMAS&attc1=None&wep2=AEK-971&attc2=None < proof you are an idiot. They have the same range and damage.
uh... you just proved yourself wrong. RoF is way better on one gun with the same stats - which effects DPS, making one stronger. |
SoTah Pawp
Amarr Templars
Amarr Empire
362
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Anita Hardone wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Anita Hardone wrote:demonkiller 12 wrote:
no they dont, seriously stop talking out your ass, even with select fire the FAMAS is **** at range because it does **** all damage at any range, all it has going is its 1000ROF with makes it purely good at close range and ok with burst at medium - its still going to lose to that noob with the AN94
http://symthic.com/bf3-weapon-comparison?wep1=FAMAS&attc1=None&wep2=AEK-971&attc2=None < proof you are an idiot. They have the same range and damage. uh... you just proved yourself wrong. RoF is way better on one gun with the same stats - which effects DPS, making one stronger. Re read the argument then come back.
Lol - you're right. If I had read his earlier posts I would of left this alone completely. He needs to calm down a bit ^_^ |
|
|
| |
|