|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
928
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 04:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
from infantry.
CCP seems to balance weapons on some statistics that are blind to individual weapons possibly being OP, unless tons of people use them and register kills.
So if there existed a dropsuit and gun which could literally not die, and literally kill anything by looking at it-- YET for whatever reason many people did not flock to it as FOTM -- it would never get a nerf. Because statistically it does not look OP. Just a few people using a totally broken weapon.
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
929
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 05:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Delilah Judge-Slayer wrote: The complain train has found a new destination for ceaseless bitching.
CCP should rename Forge Guns to Fofofofofoforgeguns.
Flaylocks got put in their place, now the best way to make protoburgers **** themselves is rooftop mounted Forge Gunners insta-gibbing wallet warriors.
could just use a militia forge. Easier to snipe with and still 1 shots the protos : / |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:19:00 -
[3] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Lemme see if I understand this...
FG hasn't had anything done to it for nearly a year - and is now broken because people have figured out how to climb onto roofs?
Nah, it's always been like this.
And like I said, broken but won't be looked at because not a lot of people use it.
It's nothing new, really. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lemme see if I understand this...
FG hasn't had anything done to it for nearly a year - and is now broken because people have figured out how to climb onto roofs?
Nah, it's always been like this. And like I said, broken but won't be looked at because not a lot of people use it. It's nothing new, really. Neither is QQ over getting killed by a weapon working at intended.
The flaylocks defended their flaylocks. The tanks defended their tanks The AR's defended the AR's now the forge guns join their ranks :P
pretending weapons arn't OP isn't new either. You're the same old same old. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote:Lemme see if I understand this...
FG hasn't had anything done to it for nearly a year - and is now broken because people have figured out how to climb onto roofs?
Nah, it's always been like this. And like I said, broken but won't be looked at because not a lot of people use it. It's nothing new, really. Neither is QQ over getting killed by a weapon working at intended. The flaylocks defended their flaylocks. The tanks defended their tanks The AR's defended the AR's now the forge guns join their ranks :P pretending weapons arn't OP isn't new either. You're the same old same old. ...you can use this argument to say any weapon is OP and anyone defending it is being 'same old same old'
Congratulations! You've figured it out! And saying complaints about a weapon being OP are just scrubs "QQing" can be equally applied!
durp |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 06:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:O wow - you made one good point. Grats. Now try doing that with your reasoning on why the FG is "Broken" rather then the map design is bad or how you're too awesome to use a sniper.
Because no amount or type of map design alterations would have any affect on the reasons and ways FG is broken.
And PS what is this about kdr? People care about that? silly straw men |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rusty Shallows wrote:DJINN leukoplast wrote:Forge would have been nerfed 10x's over by now if it was a light weapon. But not too many spec into heavies vs light/medium, and even fewer spec into a forge vs HMG. Therefore even if it's clearly being abused and OP, the stats won't be large enough for CCP to consider for tweaks. HMGs were a minority weapon but that didn't stop CCP from nerfing them useless at 1.0. For the first several months of this year the FG sucked with the double whammy of bad-game-play and excessive balancing nerfs because during beta it was too good during a time. Further CCP does monitor these forums. When people ***** they do listen. If you don't think they are aware then file a petition or submit a ticket from the site asking if they are aware of the discussion.
When HMGs were OP, everyone was using them.
It was more than half of every team and they tore things up. It was obvious. Hardly a minority weapon - at the time.
Did they nerf it too hard? Possibly |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:there is too much stupid in this thread for me to truly fathom.
"OMG BIG GUNZ ON HIGH GROUND!!! WTF?????"
I do believe this is a historical thing as well as an in-game thing.
if you take and hold the high ground, you have the advantage.
If your enemy has the high ground, you remove them.
waah waah heavies on. oh look. proto sniper rifle, meet mister "fat and slow forgegun"
I thought you two would get along well. Remember, the heavy headshot hitbox is at least 50% bigger than an assault's.
But that would be too hard for the pro AR FTW crowd who doesn't want to use this thing we call "tactics" and "adaptation."
If you're getting your ass blown off in a dropsuit fitting, CHANGE YOUR FITTING AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Or are you really that stupid and have that much tunnel-vision?
When did I mention highground? Towers are irrelevant its the gun that's a problem.
nice strawman again, though. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
SoTah Pawp wrote:So you're saying if you saw a FGer, alone, in a 1v1 on the ground scenario - you would lose because the FG is broken? Are you sure you're not just terrible?
So you're saying if you saw another man, alone, in the streets on a rainy night, you'd makeout with him?
Never said that and that's not what I'm saying. Keep trying. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: But you just said high grounds isn't the problem - so then it must be ground level.
Care to explain or are you just going to get act more butt hurt at being called bad?
he's in Hellstorm. Nothing good comes from hellstorm. Except a free target to punch in the face when you get bored.
trollolol |
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
930
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 07:56:00 -
[11] - Quote
Powerh8er wrote:I'd really like to see a guy kill 30 pluss people with the forgegun, running around hitting bullseye with every shot...
If you can't do it you're bad.
Also no need for towers. A slightly inclined hill is all you need to take advantage of the epic splash damage and 1 hit sniping from a FG.
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 08:06:00 -
[12] - Quote
ladwar wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: maybe I am - but you cant deny commando suit with a sniper and swarms can do exactly what everyone here is crying that the FG does, and the Sniper/Swarms would be better at it - with extra ammo.
not really you would have to switch weapons to be AV and you can't OHK infantry and you have less HP with barely any modules and low recharge rate while a FG can do both without switching, more modules and higher HP base without limiting is AV to being effective only on armor. meaning your much more weaker to snipers and limited to SL for AV that you have to switch which is weaker to shields all at a higher ISK cost and much higher SP cost.
no no
a forge gun is totally not a better sniper than a sniper and better AV than a swarm while being APC, tanky and costing next to nothing compared to the proto suits it 1 shots or the 1.5 million isk derpshi*s it poops all over. it takes tons of skill to aim a 320 meter, unshaking, 100% accurate gun at targets who before didn't see you and now physically can't due to rendering. And vehicles totally know when/where a FG is on the field who willl 3 shot the max EHP, max skilled, best talented pilot in under 2 seconds from the initial unpredictable blast.
the comparison to a commando with sniper and swarm was completely accurate.
/sarcasm |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
931
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 08:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:ladwar wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: maybe I am - but you cant deny commando suit with a sniper and swarms can do exactly what everyone here is crying that the FG does, and the Sniper/Swarms would be better at it - with extra ammo.
not really you would have to switch weapons to be AV and you can't OHK infantry and you have less HP with barely any modules and low recharge rate while a FG can do both without switching, more modules and higher HP base without limiting is AV to being effective only on armor. meaning your much more weaker to snipers and limited to SL for AV that you have to switch which is weaker to shields all at a higher ISK cost and much higher SP cost. no no
a forge gun is totally not a better sniper than a sniper and better AV than a swarm while being APC, tanky and costing next to nothing compared to the proto suits it 1 shots or the 1.5 million isk derpshi*s it poops all over. it takes tons of skill to aim a 320 meter, unshaking, 100% accurate gun at targets who before didn't see you and now physically can't due to rendering. And vehicles totally know when/where a FG is on the field who willl 3 shot the max EHP, max skilled, best talented pilot in under 2 seconds from the initial unpredictable blast.
the comparison to a commando with sniper and swarm was completely accurate. /sarcasm you know your post is hard to read what you mean...
alcohol does that.
here, let me make it a little easier :P (ill format /edit)
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
946
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 08:21:00 -
[14] - Quote
Breakin Stuff wrote:Nguruthos IX wrote:ladwar wrote:SoTah Pawp wrote: maybe I am - but you cant deny commando suit with a sniper and swarms can do exactly what everyone here is crying that the FG does, and the Sniper/Swarms would be better at it - with extra ammo.
not really you would have to switch weapons to be AV and you can't OHK infantry and you have less HP with barely any modules and low recharge rate while a FG can do both without switching, more modules and higher HP base without limiting is AV to being effective only on armor. meaning your much more weaker to snipers and limited to SL for AV that you have to switch which is weaker to shields all at a higher ISK cost and much higher SP cost. no no a forge gun is totally not a better sniper than a sniper and better AV than a swarm while being APC, tanky and costing next to nothing compared to the proto suits it 1 shots or the 1.5 million isk derpshi*s it poops all over. it takes tons of skill to aim a 320 meter, unshaking, 100% accurate gun at targets who before didn't see you and now physically can't due to rendering. And vehicles totally know when/where a FG is on the field who willl 3 shot the max EHP, max skilled, best talented pilot in under 2 seconds from the initial unpredictable blast. the comparison to a commando with sniper and swarm was completely accurate. /sarcasm Yes because ISk cost has always mean niche protection in Dust. clearly if you spend more money on it that means you should be invulnerable to anything that costs less than you spent. Right. you want Dust to become pay-to-win. gotcha.
You don't see frigates 1 shotting Titans. Far less soloing them even if it did take 10 hours.
|
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
946
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 08:24:00 -
[15] - Quote
PS this was a discussion thread about CCP's method of balancing gun-play and mechanics as being inherently errant. |
Nguruthos IX
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
953
|
Posted - 2013.08.01 10:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
John Demonsbane wrote:To the OP: This phenomenon is known as "recall bias." (Look it up)
Also, I'm calling BS on the "this isn't about the FG, it's about the way CCP balances things" backpedal.
Then read the first post.
|
|
|
|