it depends on the situations/circumstances under which these individuals k/d increases. for example,

people said flaylocks were OP. but, the only situations in which they were effective were CQB. therefore, a mid range weapon lossing to a CQB weapon is clear not OP, its simply doing its job.

If those 50 people using SMGs were outgunning ARs at mid range, that could indicate a problem. however, if it is close obviously its ok.


Ars dn't only out range every other gun other than snipers, but they beat them in close range as well. at elevated hieghts and basically in any situation. can't be more OP than that

I love Scr rifles! to death!...lol

but they are balanced by range, fire rate and armor/shield damage.

being a single fire weapon the Scr is horrible in CQB. although the hip fire is still pretty good CQB, you cant spam the trigger because you will miss most shots in CQC and you'll overheat. Scr requires skill. At longer ranges, side to side movement can cause misses, and every shot counts with the overheating factor. lol

AScr is balanced too, its good only in its intended range of mid-close range.

The problem I see with the AR is this

Shotgun beat AR in the 0-5 meter range (50% of the time due to hit detection, so its equal footing)

Snipers and Forges beat AR at 90+ range (100% of the time)

Mass Drivers and explosives can own ARs around corners / obstacles

ARs are undisputed within the 5-75 range mark, no other low mid, mid, or high mid range weapon can compare outside of player skill difference. Meaning the only diversity will come through explosives, or super cqc or distant range weapons.