Shield tankers can benefit from both high power and low power slots, while armor tankers can only use low power slots for their tank. I am not counting armor repairing nano hives because basic heavies and sentinels can't carry any equipment, and when minmatar and caldari heavy frames get introduced, amarr and gallente will be at a great disadvantage, especially if infantry shield transporters get introduced.

I suggest introducing a high power slot module that increases the armor repairer's repair rate, similar to the auxiliary nano pump in eve. Another idea is armor resistance modules that will passively buff armor ehp.

Virtually every experienced heavy would rather have a complex damage mod in a high slot over a shield extender...or any other module you invent.

Agreed

Virtually every experienced heavy would rather have a complex damage mod in a high slot over a shield extender...or any other module you invent.

Lets just do that, and then, lets make a grenade that does 1500 damage to ds armor. Oh and then lets make shield extenders that give 120hp ea and then lets give those a movement penalty. And then lets make armor and shields rep at the same rate.

I get tired of hearing its not fair or armor needs this, w/e dude, spec into shields then. No1 wants to adrress the current issues with shields though.. like whats a regulator really good for anyway... unless ur losing tank or damage for recharge. Recharge and regulation go hand in hand.

The only thing armor should get to help balance it with shields is.. a decrease in the movement penalty on the complex plates.. or maybe a buff to the armor rep modules thats it. Otherwise they just need to make shields and armor the same or remove 1 of them.

Personally i'd like a grenade that took off all dropsuit armor, or an ar like the scrambler, thats fully auto aimed at shredding armor. Theres ups and downs to both..pick the ups and downs you can live with and go into that peeps. And please ffs quit complaining.

Makes sense. Maybe armour hardeners or resistances would go in high slots?

I'd say keep hardeners in the low slots, but something that multiplies repair rate by a percentage in the high slot.

Of any armor mods that could go in a highslot, this makes the most sense.

I would love some energised armour plating to protect myself from those pesky plasma and explosive weapons.

There is not a single armor module in EVE that goes to a medium slot (equivalent to Dust's high slot), but there are shield modules that go into low slots.

As for shield transporters for infantry to use, let them! But here's the catch: they work like vehicle shield transporters. This mean that they don't work on infantry, and only on vehicles. Shield vehicles are very disadvantaged right now, and I want to be able to hop out and help my shields a little between booster cycles. I could just recall and call in a new fully repped tank, but repairing it myself is more legit.