|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 20:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
If they chose their spec for reasons of wanting the items as they were intended, both in power and gamplay, then they don't need a respec. If they didn't, there is no reason to refund a logi skill for what is still a logi suit. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 21:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
hooc order wrote:Dr Stabwounds wrote:1 problem with your argument - You claim most people specced into them not knowing, but in fact it was mostly the opposite, especially with the flaylock. A lot of people specced into them b/c they knew they were OP. Eon and LoI war... These are the people that "knew". Hell half of em were part of the whole damn TAC min maxing from a few months ago. Yet they voluntarily gave it up. Obviously they did not know how bad it was until they saw how bad it was. Also again you are still on your witchhunt. Some people "knew" some did not....who the **** cares. Is this about balancing the game or about hunting down and punishing the wicked? Or they did know, trained it to get an edge, but that edge proved so necessary that it permeated the game and ruined other aspects of the matches. If it became something they had to BAN it's because people were using it too much and that came about from people wanting the most effective, even if broken thing in PC. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 21:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
hooc order wrote: Yes this is an attempt to make villains out of them. Why do you keep mentioning "they knew"? You want to dehumanize them so you won't feel bad about them being screwed over. Either this is about balancing the game or it isn't. Weather they knew or did not know should have no bearing on balance.
Jesus how many ways do i have to write this before it can seep into your thick skull.
Furthermore if you did not think this balancing was screwing them over then why do you need to desperately clutch to the claims that "they knew"? Why do you need that crutch to rationalize not giving them a respec?
There is no dehumanization. Either they trained what they wanted or trained what they knew was op. Both can end up at the same place, neither needs a respec. They made decisions in a system designed to preserve decisions through balance changes. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
128
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 21:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
hooc order wrote: "Them knowing" is off the table. Quit restating it like it is an argument. This is not rocket science. CCP is attempting to balance the game. They are not out to punish legitimate players who you do not like. Perhaps you want that but it is not a serious argument on how a game should be designed.
You guys keep bringing this argument up so i assume it is the reason why you oppose the repec. Now that your argument is off the table you should clearly see that a respec is justified. Games cannot be designed because you are pissed at some player who speced a certain way....If they did not **** you off then you should clearly see how they are being screwed. Otherwise why even bring up the argument.
You need to clear your head...quit being angry and out for revenge and start supporting a respec because people are being unjustly screwed over.
It's not a punishment. It's the same restriction we all have. We used our SP and we're stuck with it where it is. Regardless of what you trained. Subject to future balance changes and unknowns same as those who are affected now. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:00:00 -
[5] - Quote
hooc order wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:hooc order wrote: Yes this is an attempt to make villains out of them. Why do you keep mentioning "they knew"? You want to dehumanize them so you won't feel bad about them being screwed over. Either this is about balancing the game or it isn't. Weather they knew or did not know should have no bearing on balance.
Jesus how many ways do i have to write this before it can seep into your thick skull.
Furthermore if you did not think this balancing was screwing them over then why do you need to desperately clutch to the claims that "they knew"? Why do you need that crutch to rationalize not giving them a respec?
There is no dehumanization. Either they trained what they wanted or trained what they knew was op. Both can end up at the same place, neither needs a respec. They made decisions in a system designed to preserve decisions through balance changes. You just changed your argument....in a matter of a few min. Before you wanted no respec to punish them now you want to "preserve decisions. You moved the goal post. You just lost the argument. I never changed my argument, stop confusing me with other people. My position has always been permanence of the skill system, that is what my arguments were based upon.
Edit: If it "punishes" someone then so be it. It's an inherent quality of this system, not a goal. And making up arguments to make yourself the victor is very unconvincing. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
hooc order wrote: Probably not....but damn it i am here to win not change minds =)
One thing a guy above us mentioned is New Edan has always been Min/Max heavy....
I did not go into it but it really does make this villianizatrion of these players even more absurd.
Why are these Min/max villains so very different then other min/max players? Why are they so very special that they need to pushed from the game?
Weirdness.
They aren't, they did it once and should they see the opportunity they will do it again. It isn't wrong, but that isn't a reason for game mechanics to be altered to help them. I min maxed training in eve, but did you know it has the opposite effect? Imagine having your ship choices and DPS output limited because you were spending the next year or 2 on perfecting your electronics and engineering trees. It's not a matter of handpicking elements like it is here. But still, that isn't a bad thing on either games part. They allocated their SP, we did the same. Why shouldn't we all live with those decisions? |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
130
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:16:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tek Hound wrote:-ŽOP Trying to twell most of the dust players this is a waste. Alot of them spec Ar so when one Ar gets nerfed they can move on to the other. When a niche weapon gets nerfed its done and the person who spec into it is screwed. So dont waste your time this Ar514 anyway. Wait, so AR users can move on, but others can't? |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
131
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
hooc order wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:hooc order wrote: Probably not....but damn it i am here to win not change minds =)
One thing a guy above us mentioned is New Edan has always been Min/Max heavy....
I did not go into it but it really does make this villianizatrion of these players even more absurd.
Why are these Min/max villains so very different then other min/max players? Why are they so very special that they need to pushed from the game?
Weirdness.
They aren't, they did it once and should they see the opportunity they will do it again. It isn't wrong, but that isn't a reason for game mechanics to be altered to help them. I min maxed training in eve, but did you know it has the opposite effect? Imagine having your ship choices and DPS output limited because you were spending the next year or 2 on perfecting your electronics and engineering trees. It's not a matter of handpicking elements like it is here. But still, that isn't a bad thing on either games part. They allocated their SP, we did the same. Why shouldn't we all live with those decisions? Because those decisions were based on facts at a given time and a given version of the game that can and will change with each update. CCP has proven there is no permanence to those facts and will change them arbitrarily. And yes i mean arbitrary. Just look at the over kill on the laser nerf. You want players to keep with their decisions when CCP will change the very laws of the universe of the game with each update. You are trying to preserve a phantom that never existed, will never exist and cannot exist. There are ways to establish permanence in an MMO world....trying to do it with "no respecs ever ever ever" when the world is always changing is doing it azz backwards and guaranteed to fail. Yet eve is doing it even now and has done it for a decade. It clearly isn't something that can't be done when it is being done.
It's also important to recall that the stats on the suits and weapons were only a part of the story here. SP permanence doesn't equate to item stat permanence. The changes you mention are and should have been a part of a persons decisions with SP allocation. We weren't promised a respec with balance changes and as such we had choices to make, including chasing the best or sticking with something that we like or just diversifying. The dynamic nature of things right now is another fact to take into account, not a factor which invalidates decision making. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
131
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Tek Hound wrote:Promethius Franklin wrote:Tek Hound wrote:-ŽOP Trying to twell most of the dust players this is a waste. Alot of them spec Ar so when one Ar gets nerfed they can move on to the other. When a niche weapon gets nerfed its done and the person who spec into it is screwed. So dont waste your time this Ar514 anyway. Wait, so AR users can move on, but others can't? Correct that's why alot dust players don't understand tac got nerfed they went to gek. Niche players laser for example got screwed and needed a respec. Now its a logi and niche up to bat and they cant move on.People who spec into them for fun got screwed by fotm players and The Ar Cry board. Cal logi can still logi, there isn't a need to move elsewhere. LR may be overnerfed, but I'm still not asking for my SP back from it. I'll wait to see what the future holds. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
133
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 22:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
hooc order wrote: FYI by constantly changing the game CCP is cowtowing to min/maxing. not he other way around.
You honestly think the "they knew" min/max crowd don't also know about the multiple accounts on PSN loophole?
"No respec ever ever ever" will always harm the "don't know" crowd more then the min/maxers.
Note: it is amusing that I thought you were one who saw the hypocrisy but it just turns out you are a hypocrite.
Adding respecs will benefit the min/max crowd more than others, so how is no respecs cowtowing to them? changing the game isn't either as the combination of changes and no respecs means they have to work the hardest to stay on top while the rest of us just train what we feel like. Multi PSN account users aren't an instant ticket to0 high SP characters either. Those characters are burned with each update and aren't coming to proficiency as fast as balance changes come out. |
|
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
134
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 23:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
hooc order wrote: Player PvP in Eve is a minimal affair. That game for all intents and purposes is a co-op PvE exploration gathering game with safe zones. Farmville in space.
"No repec ever ever" is not an issue when mining asteroids and shooting at AI.
Says the guy who is arguing about the uninformed generalizations of others. Eve has no safe zones. We have a wide variety of tools for informing people otherwise and use them often. |
Promethius Franklin
DUST University Ivy League
134
|
Posted - 2013.07.26 23:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
hooc order wrote:That is not true. So long as there are imbalances the well informed Min/Max crowed will always be better off with arbitrary changes that are hidden and hard to adjust to....that is the nature of being a Min/maxer. So your idea of how to resolve that is to give them a free pass to the detriment of everyone else? Respecs do help min/max'ers more then anyone else by way of removing any and all resistance or effort for them. They don't need to diversify or experiment. They get to a set number of SP once and are permanently set for life with respecs. |
|
|
|