DUST Search - Let swarm launchers lock onto neutral installations

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

Let swarm launchers lock onto neutral installations

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1521	Posted - 2013.07.29 02:27:00 - [31] - Quote /bump
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1524	Posted - 2013.07.29 08:40:00 - [32] - Quote /bump
Shattered Mirage The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 13	Posted - 2013.07.29 10:17:00 - [33] - Quote Hmm.... they ninja nerfed that? I remember being able to lock on to neutral targets....
Aikuchi Tomaru Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 144	Posted - 2013.07.29 10:21:00 - [34] - Quote 10123Jman wrote: Its cause as soon as people would spawn they would SWARM every installation to get 100 wp each And this is really annoying. These guns have some kind of strategical value. And every time I try to hack them some guy thinks it's better to blow it up so he can get 100 WP.
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1525	Posted - 2013.07.29 11:26:00 - [35] - Quote Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: 10123Jman wrote: Its cause as soon as people would spawn they would SWARM every installation to get 100 wp each And this is really annoying. These guns have some kind of strategical value. And every time I try to hack them some guy thinks it's better to blow it up so he can get 100 WP. I blow them up because they are an annoyance to both infantry and vehicles . I'll destroy them when they're red or a forge gunner or vehicle driver will.
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 776	Posted - 2013.07.29 11:49:00 - [36] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Garth Mandra wrote: Let us dumb fire them. Some balancing would be required to prevent them being used as shotguns like they once were. CCP were lazy with the turning off dumbfire during beta. They should fix the balance properly (warhead activation time, spread, launch time, etc) so that they can turn dumbfire back on. I would like them to dumb fire but if I could lock onto installations it would be just fine. I think we should be able to lock onto anything with a sufficiently high sig profile, while giving Shield mods a penalty (increase) to Sig Profile. Let's see how they like their stacked Shield Extenders then......
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1527	Posted - 2013.07.29 21:56:00 - [37] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Garth Mandra wrote: Let us dumb fire them. Some balancing would be required to prevent them being used as shotguns like they once were. CCP were lazy with the turning off dumbfire during beta. They should fix the balance properly (warhead activation time, spread, launch time, etc) so that they can turn dumbfire back on. I would like them to dumb fire but if I could lock onto installations it would be just fine. I think we should be able to lock onto anything with a sufficiently high sig profile, while giving Shield mods a penalty (increase) to Sig Profile. Let's see how they like their stacked Shield Extenders then...... Huh? I'm not quite sure I get this post. If I think I know what you mean then no, keep it the way it is.
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 785	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:01:00 - [38] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Garth Mandra wrote: Let us dumb fire them. Some balancing would be required to prevent them being used as shotguns like they once were. CCP were lazy with the turning off dumbfire during beta. They should fix the balance properly (warhead activation time, spread, launch time, etc) so that they can turn dumbfire back on. I would like them to dumb fire but if I could lock onto installations it would be just fine. I think we should be able to lock onto anything with a sufficiently high sig profile, while giving Shield mods a penalty (increase) to Sig Profile. Let's see how they like their stacked Shield Extenders then...... Huh? I'm not quite sure I get this post. If I think I know what you mean then no, keep it the way it is. I'd rather have the suggestion that I made than have dumbfire back. It would give some penalty to Shield mods too. win, win.
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1527	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:03:00 - [39] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Garth Mandra wrote: Let us dumb fire them. Some balancing would be required to prevent them being used as shotguns like they once were. CCP were lazy with the turning off dumbfire during beta. They should fix the balance properly (warhead activation time, spread, launch time, etc) so that they can turn dumbfire back on. I would like them to dumb fire but if I could lock onto installations it would be just fine. I think we should be able to lock onto anything with a sufficiently high sig profile, while giving Shield mods a penalty (increase) to Sig Profile. Let's see how they like their stacked Shield Extenders then...... Huh? I'm not quite sure I get this post. If I think I know what you mean then no, keep it the way it is. I'd rather have the suggestion that I made than have dumbfire back. It would give some penalty to Shield mods too. win, win. Well I'd much rather just be able to lock on to neutral installations lol.
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 785	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:06:00 - [40] - Quote Kane Fyea wrote: Well I'd much rather just be able to lock on to neutral installations lol. Well, I'm not saying that is a bad idea, I just think there should also be more to Sig Profile. I look at them as being connected. Could you imagine the self-proclaimed "athlete" tears that would be harvested?

Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1537	Posted - 2013.07.30 02:33:00 - [41] - Quote Alaika Arbosa wrote: Kane Fyea wrote: Well I'd much rather just be able to lock on to neutral installations lol. Well, I'm not saying that is a bad idea, I just think there should also be more to Sig Profile. I look at them as being connected. Could you imagine the self-proclaimed "athlete" tears that would be harvested? I think it should just stay the same. Just let me lock onto those neutral installations lol.
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1537	Posted - 2013.07.31 00:28:00 - [42] - Quote /bump
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1545	Posted - 2013.08.01 22:45:00 - [43] - Quote /bump
Shattered Mirage The Enclave Syndicate Dark Taboo 50	Posted - 2013.08.02 03:38:00 - [44] - Quote I think it is now dead....
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1664	Posted - 2013.09.16 21:45:00 - [45] - Quote Shattered Mirage wrote: I think it is now dead.... Until I revived it once again
Bright Cloud Namtar Elite Gallente Federation 177	Posted - 2013.09.16 22:01:00 - [46] - Quote dumb fire swarms would be OP as hell due to their really low fire intervall delay. Basically you could empty a full swarm launcher clip in less then a sec. Which would tear tanks apart if you get up close to them.
Xaviah Reaper Savage Arms INC 14	Posted - 2013.09.16 23:36:00 - [47] - Quote They cant? O.o i dont use SLs but i think thats kindof silly. +1 Reaper
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1667	Posted - 2013.09.17 00:55:00 - [48] - Quote Bright Cloud wrote: dumb fire swarms would be OP as hell due to their really low fire intervall delay. Basically you could empty a full swarm launcher clip in less then a sec. Which would tear tanks apart if you get up close to them. I want to lock onto neutral installations not be able to dumbfire. So please get out of my thread unless you have something to say about the OP.
Marukse Geddrase Eyniletti Rangers Minmatar Republic 0	Posted - 2013.10.16 19:14:00 - [49] - Quote Maybe increasing the reload time and snap-shot time of the launcher would make it a bit more of a balanced weapon. I still like the idea of dumb-fire swarms, but perhaps make the user vulnerable while firing or make it take longer than a half a second to empty the missile tube. If you have ever played Halo-Reach, the rocket-hog would be a good example of this. That set-up is a lot more difficult to use effectively, but can still do a massive amount of damage with a direct hit.


Pages: 1 [2] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.