Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1222
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
All,
I respect the work that our CPM has done for the community. They stepped up on short notice and helped facilitate the move from beta to release. They were a great face to have out there at FanFest.
That said, it is now time for CCP to hold a proper election for our representatives so that we can chose the face of Dust514's great player base.
I hearby create this thread as an open petition to CCP to hold official elections. Please sign if you agree.
Thanks, Forlorn Destrier ("The sad warhouse that everyone forgets, so he kicks puppies") |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1223
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Let me just add, I see no reason the current CPM should not be allowed to run if they want to continue in their roles. |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
5456
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
::facepalm::
Come back this time next year, and maybe we'll be ready. This community is in no way shape or form ready to make a collective, informed decision on who actually has not only the ability, but the drive and desire to do what the CPM does.
Thankfully you don't have to worry about pulling out early, cuz I doubt you'll even get in :/ |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1223
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:::facepalm::
Come back this time next year, and maybe we'll be ready. This community is in no way shape or form ready to make a collective, informed decision on who actually has not only the ability, but the drive and desire to do what the CPM does.
Thankfully you don't have to worry about pulling out early, cuz I doubt you'll even get in :/
I have no desire to run.
Also, it is time. They can serve an abbreviated term, but I would like to have people representing me that I trust, and no offense but there are members of the CPM now that I have no trust for.
|
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
1047
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 20:56:00 -
[5] - Quote
The CPM isn't even set up yet - they're still trying to create a proper working relationship with CCP. Anyone new to the CPM would only hinder these efforts because they'd have no idea what they're getting into.
We don't need proper representation yet because they don't have any way to represent us. Read some of Hans' CPM activity reports to get a better idea of what you're talking about before you start suggesting things nobody is actually ready for.
Here's the link: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=915156#post915156 |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1223
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:The CPM isn't even set up yet - they're still trying to create a proper working relationship with CCP. Anyone new to the CPM would only hinder these efforts because they'd have no idea what they're getting into. We don't need proper representation yet because they don't have any way to represent us. Read some of Hans' CPM activity reports to get a better idea of what you're talking about before you start suggesting things nobody is actually ready for. Here's the link: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=915156#post915156
This is a more appropriate response; that said, I personally don't think the current CPM is capable of "creating a proper working relationship with CCP". Some of the members are ok, but I don't trust most of them. Just my opinion of course. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
1047
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:11:00 -
[7] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Django Quik wrote:The CPM isn't even set up yet - they're still trying to create a proper working relationship with CCP. Anyone new to the CPM would only hinder these efforts because they'd have no idea what they're getting into. We don't need proper representation yet because they don't have any way to represent us. Read some of Hans' CPM activity reports to get a better idea of what you're talking about before you start suggesting things nobody is actually ready for. Here's the link: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=915156#post915156 This is a more appropriate response; that said, I personally don't think the current CPM is capable of "creating a proper working relationship with CCP". Some of the members are ok, but I don't trust most of them. Just my opinion of course. It doesn't matter if you trust them or not - they're not doing this for you; they're doing it for future CPMs. The fact is they are all capable of doing it, especially Hans with his previous CSM experience - this is probably the only CPM we'll ever have that has no members who are 'dead weight'. |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1224
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:14:00 -
[8] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:Django Quik wrote:The CPM isn't even set up yet - they're still trying to create a proper working relationship with CCP. Anyone new to the CPM would only hinder these efforts because they'd have no idea what they're getting into. We don't need proper representation yet because they don't have any way to represent us. Read some of Hans' CPM activity reports to get a better idea of what you're talking about before you start suggesting things nobody is actually ready for. Here's the link: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=915156#post915156 This is a more appropriate response; that said, I personally don't think the current CPM is capable of "creating a proper working relationship with CCP". Some of the members are ok, but I don't trust most of them. Just my opinion of course. It doesn't matter if you trust them or not - they're not doing this for you; they're doing it for future CPMs. The fact is they are all capable of doing it, especially Hans with his previous CSM experience - this is probably the only CPM we'll ever have that has no members who are 'dead weight'.
To you it's a "fact" that they can. To me, it's an opinion, and I don't share the opinion.
Thanks for your input (which is constructive and the reason I started the thread).
As for dead weight, there is dead weight in the current CPM in myopinion (which I am entitled to); I'm trying to be polite and not call them out. I'd just rather if the community be able to decide for themselves who is our representation; if the community votes in someone I don't like, I can accept it more easily. |
Django Quik
R.I.f.t
1048
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:As for dead weight, there is dead weight in the current CPM in myopinion (which I am entitled to); I'm trying to be polite and not call them out. I'd just rather if the community be able to decide for themselves who is our representation; if the community votes in someone I don't like, I can accept it more easily. Just because you don't see what they're doing, it doesn't mean they're doing nothing. Read the reports and you'll get a better idea because this CPM is not so much about being the community's monkeys like you sound like you want them to be but doing a lot of talking with CPM behind the scenes to get everything set up. Hell, they don't even know who all the teams are or what they're all working on yet. You think anyone else could do that? What will anyone else do? Jumping up and down and saying the community wants (insert whatever cause you think is important and currently unrepresented) won't get anywhere because they won't know who to be talking to.
You should go look through the history of the CSM and see what real dead weight looks like. |
hooc order
Deep Space Republic Top Men.
762
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:25:00 -
[10] - Quote
Signed
hooc order
note: i do not respect the work the CPM does like the OP does. |
|
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1224
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Forlorn Destrier wrote:As for dead weight, there is dead weight in the current CPM in myopinion (which I am entitled to); I'm trying to be polite and not call them out. I'd just rather if the community be able to decide for themselves who is our representation; if the community votes in someone I don't like, I can accept it more easily. Just because you don't see what they're doing, it doesn't mean they're doing nothing. Read the reports and you'll get a better idea because this CPM is not so much about being the community's monkeys like you sound like you want them to be but doing a lot of talking with CPM behind the scenes to get everything set up. Hell, they don't even know who all the teams are or what they're all working on yet. You think anyone else could do that? What will anyone else do? Jumping up and down and saying the community wants (insert whatever cause you think is important and currently unrepresented) won't get anywhere because they won't know who to be talking to. You should go look through the history of the CSM and see what real dead weight looks like.
No offense, but you are assuming that I don't watch what they are doing, and read the threads. With respect, my conclusions are different. If no one signs the petition, that's fine. It doesn't bother me.
That said, I don't think I'm the only one that feels this way. I am happy with some of them, but not with others. That is my opinion, and your opinion won't change mine. Just as mine won't change yours.
The purpose of this is to see how many others (if any) agree with me. You have made your point, and are welcome to your opinions.
Thank you for keeping my thread relevant and allowing the debate. |
Jason Punk
DUST University Ivy League
171
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:35:00 -
[12] - Quote
Nah, while I always enjoy bumping heads with Fiend, he's absolutely right. Hate em or love em, they got to run their course and establish a solid precedent for the next round of CPM. The worst thing to do right now would be to pushing "reset" on leadership. If Bernanke just up and left halfway through QE1 or 2, it would have been a shitstorm. Salvageable, but a shitstorm regardless.
In fact, I fear that might already be realized if Larino is stepping down (or already has). I sincerely hope it's a false alarm as he's a smart guy and always understood the for what he wanted it to be, but if so I wish him all the best for both the him and the game.
How exactly do you think people learn how to lead or establish relationships? It takes time son; Trial and Error |
Forlorn Destrier
Bullet Cluster
1224
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 21:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jason Punk wrote:Nah, while I always enjoy bumping heads with Fiend, he's absolutely right. Hate em or love em, they got to run their course and establish a solid precedent for the next round of CPM. The worst thing to do right now would be to pushing "reset" on leadership. If Bernanke just up and left halfway through QE1 or 2, it would have been a shitstorm. Salvageable, but a shitstorm regardless.
In fact, I fear that might already be realized if Larino is stepping down (or already has). I sincerely hope it's a false alarm as he's a smart guy and always understood the for what he wanted it to be, but if so I wish him all the best for both the him and the game.
How exactly do you think people learn how to lead or establish relationships? It takes time son; Trial and Error
I don't think this is the right method to learn to lead or establish relationships, though it is better than others.
Oh, and don't call me "son". My father passed away a few years ago (and while you have no way of knowing that), I think it's disrespectful to his memory. Thanks for understanding.
|
KING SALASI
MAJOR DISTRIBUTION
158
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:::facepalm::
Come back this time next year, and maybe we'll be ready. This community is in no way shape or form ready to make a collective, informed decision on who actually has not only the ability, but the drive and desire to do what the CPM does.
Thankfully you don't have to worry about pulling out early, cuz I doubt you'll even get in :/
Next year my vote is for Dust Fiend , until theb meh could care less for the current CPM's. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
1210
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:19:00 -
[15] - Quote
Basically, for all the reasons Here in Han's post.. Now is not the time for an election. The groundwork we are laying is slow going, but it's happening. To stop that and get a new council in before the process is established enough that they can take over, would be a massive waste of both CPM0 and CPM1's time collectively, not to mention how a transition period would stress relations for both groups with CCP.
As to your other concern, there is no one on the CPM who is dead weight. Any concerns to such are completely hearsay and inaccurate. All of us without exception have had stints where we were unavailable, but all members are contributing. I wouldn't defend my fellow councilmates if this was not true. I'd be more than happy to call them on it, as 'NO DEAD WEIGHT" is one of my personal priorities for future CPM's. As it is though, everyone has pulled their weight where it counts so far.
As far as trust goes, there's really not much we can do beyond stuff like the AMA we did today and doing townhalls, giving the community more chances to talk to us as a whole and get a feel for what we are doing and how 'the process' is shaping up. No one is ever going to have 100% popularity, and that's certainly not amongst our goals. |
Killar-12
Intrepidus XI EoN.
318
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:20:00 -
[16] - Quote
Bubble Democracy and Popularity contests, if this isn't the right time you are suffering from burn out, just find another game to play for a few weeks and chill out, an election could further disrupt the current player base and it would hinder the Current CPM's efforts at comunicating with CCP who are having their own problems. |
Killar-12
Intrepidus XI EoN.
318
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Heinrich Jagerblitzen wrote:Regardless of what our "mandate" is, setting up an election process and an election process alone is a rather pointless exercise all things considered. That is, unless you're in a rush to have elections and select a new council that faces the same uphill battle we do right now getting a working relationship established with CCP, and that can't do much more than any other player can via the forums because they dev's don't magically open a firehose of information to them because they got a white tag overnight. Also, you'd be in a rush to have a council where I won't be involved (since this proto-council is the end of my "political" career) and I'm one of the few individuals (on either the CPM or CCP) involved right now that has extensive experience working systematically and successfully in this capacity. There is simply no way that elections can be our primary focus, even though that process has begun, as Caz demonstrated. Others are free to disagree, of course - but that's how I see it. We're in contact with CCP of course, via Skype and our internal forums - but we still await a good amount of information from the various devs teams, their roadmap, and pending projects - that will take time to open up and to get flowing regularly. This is my personal priority as a CPM member, because frankly I could care less how the next council gets elected if it doesnt have the same level of access to the development process that the current CSM. It would merely be a democratically-selected feel-good club. The reason it's not easy to achieve this by just opening the firehose of information is because this is a different studio than the one that makes EVE and most of these developers have never invited in outsiders to participate in their working process the way that the EVE developers have learned to over a several-year period. If we as a CPM achieve this over the next several months we'll still be making a remarkable progress in a short amount of time compared to the years it took the CSM to get there, but that short amount of time is not 4-5 weeks (our time in office so far). Your patience is both needed and appreciated. I totally get it - in the meantime everyone's having fun going rah rah rah and stamping feet and pointing fingers and criticizing, but if you think that this was all going to magically happen overnight or that the only thing the CPM should be focusing on is how to vote for a second council who would still need to build working relationships from scratch (and without someone on board who had done this before), you were sorely mistaken. This^^ |
Gogo O'Dell
Psygod9 RISE of LEGION
61
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:33:00 -
[18] - Quote
Signed. Vote Caeli!!!! |
Killar-12
Intrepidus XI EoN.
319
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 22:37:00 -
[19] - Quote
Gogo O'Dell wrote:Signed. Vote Caeli!!!! How about we eliminate those who don't communicate so we can keep Kain, Hans, IWS, Nova, and Cazerdon |
DoomLead
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 23:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sign as long as iron wolf saber stays
|
|
Panther Alpha
DarkWingsss
762
|
Posted - 2013.07.24 23:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
A new CPM will make no difference ... CCP haven't even plant the seeds for the tree yet, is no need for someone to pick the apples.
|
Jason Punk
DUST University Ivy League
179
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 06:24:00 -
[22] - Quote
Forlorn Destrier wrote:Jason Punk wrote:Nah, while I always enjoy bumping heads with Fiend, he's absolutely right. Hate em or love em, they got to run their course and establish a solid precedent for the next round of CPM. The worst thing to do right now would be to pushing "reset" on leadership. If Bernanke just up and left halfway through QE1 or 2, it would have been a shitstorm. Salvageable, but a shitstorm regardless.
In fact, I fear that might already be realized if Larino is stepping down (or already has). I sincerely hope it's a false alarm as he's a smart guy and always understood the for what he wanted it to be, but if so I wish him all the best for both the him and the game.
How exactly do you think people learn how to lead or establish relationships? It takes time son; Trial and Error I don't think this is the right method to learn to lead or establish relationships, though it is better than others. Oh, and don't call me "son". My father passed away a few years ago (and while you have no way of knowing that), I think it's disrespectful to his memory. Thanks for understanding.
You're right, there was no way of knowing this.
As for leadership, there is no way to teach it. Some people make great organizers or managers, but leaders are something utterly different. You have it or you don't. So perhaps we should rephrase it to "this is rather new frontier and a unique link that needs to be explored, recollected, and ultimately debriefed for the next phase of managers". interrupting this process is not only undesirable, but potentially harmful as there is little to no precedence for the new management to follow or retract from and a further example for the community that if we don't like something we can remove you. This attitude both freezes people making tough decisions and possibly eliminates the short-term growth of the CPM for the next year+.
I don't think, no matter what they've done or haven't done, that this is the proper approach to a dilemma, although I understand the frustration. Rather, I might recommend doing exactly what should be going on: taking notes and forming an better platform and process by which to replace them this winter. |
Skipper Jones
Molon Labe. League of Infamy
489
|
Posted - 2013.07.25 06:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Skipper Jones 4 prez |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |