|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
139
   |
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Standard Amarr would probably have a problem with this  |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
140
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 02:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Garth Mandra wrote:This is not a fix. This is a bandaid.
When/if CCP manages to balance the suits properly arbitrary rules like the one the OP suggested won't be required.
Incidentally I we should be able to deploy in vehicles with no or missing turrets, in dropsuits with no weapons etc. This is supposed to be a sandbox so we should be able to do whatever we want even if it is probably stupid.
Weapons are optional? I can really get behind that. If you use LAVs to just get around then it is a waste of money to actually buy a turret for the dam thing. Some Logis literally only use weapons because it is required. If they allowed you to punch (obviously the dmg would be low) and choose not to use weapons at all then logis could really fit themselves for full support. |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 11:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
Cosgar wrote:
Riiight, I think we're done here. Like everyone else, you're jumping on the "X is OP" because you can't even explain why it's OP. (If it is) People get kills in logistics suits because most of them are good at First Person Shooters. Everyone is buthurt because one suit was OP and they want to penalize the others that had nothing to do with the initial suit. Until you can give me some hard numbers or some kind of example of how all of the racial logis > racial assaults through examples, this thread is a waste of time.
If that's how you feel then what was the point in coming here in the first place?
People complain about the different threads that are posted but they don't seem to realize that by commenting on those threads, there are just bumping them and allowing them to stick around longer. If you really don't like the way a thread is going then do what I do, stop commenting and leave. If everyone did this then useless threads would die fairly quick.
As for this thread... eh, no harm done. Just another guy voicing there opinion and I see nothing wrong with that. |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 13:24:00 -
[4] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:Forcing players to fit their suits a certain way is fundamentally against the freedom of the fitting is meant to offer.
If that's how you feel then you agree with not needing a weapon to make a usable fit, right?
LOL but yea, forcing you to fit you stuff a certain way would take from the "fight your war" mentality. |
ALPHA DECRIPTER
M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces
D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
142
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 13:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bendtner92 wrote:Dumbest idea ever.
I suspect your suggestion of a minimum of 3 equipment of minimum advanced tier is for prototype suits? What about advanced suits? Standard suits?
What if someone is using 2 prototype equipment and 2 standard, and is filling up his low and high slots with CPU/PG intensive stuff, so that he's unable to upgrade his standard equipment? He would still be doing his logi job, but because he's running two standard equipment his fit is invalid.
Please let this thread die. It's en even worse idea than the threads suggesting all logis to be restricted to sidearms, which was a pretty terrible idea.
A bit insensitive but not the dumbest
Someone suggested sidearms only for logis? Where was this? |
|
|
| |
|