They need to compete somehow, kinda hard fighting against a corp like 100x better than them .

tbh, it's a matter of mutual respect.

Let me give an unpopular opinion on this whole 'truce' thing.

TP and other EoN corps rely a lot on shotgunners and heavies - basically CQC. What's the counter? Either use it yourself or explode them.

This truce favors EoN play style over LoI mid range play style. It was in very bad strategic taste that this agreement was made and I laughed hard at LoI when I heard about it.

I give props to 187 who probably realize gun-game alone won't win there battles. This is New Eden - gotta do what you gotta do. Same with my Logi-LAV.

Let me give an unpopular opinion on this whole 'truce' thing.

TP and other EoN corps rely a lot on shotgunners and heavies - basically CQC. What's the counter? Either use it yourself or explode them.

This truce favors EoN play style over LoI mid range play style. It was in very bad strategic taste that this agreement was made and I laughed hard at LoI when I heard about it.

I give props to 187 who probably realize gun-game alone won't win there battles. This is New Eden - gotta do what you gotta do. Same with my Logi-LAV.

Let me give an unpopular opinion on this whole 'truce' thing.

TP and other EoN corps rely a lot on shotgunners and heavies - basically CQC. What's the counter? Either use it yourself or explode them.

This truce favors EoN play style over LoI mid range play style. It was in very bad strategic taste that this agreement was made and I laughed hard at LoI when I heard about it.

I give props to 187 who probably realize gun-game alone won't win there battles. This is New Eden - gotta do what you gotta do. Same with my Logi-LAV.

Let me give an unpopular opinion on this whole 'truce' thing.

TP and other EoN corps rely a lot on shotgunners and heavies - basically CQC. What's the counter? Either use it yourself or explode them.

This truce favors EoN play style over LoI mid range play style. It was in very bad strategic taste that this agreement was made and I laughed hard at LoI when I heard about it.

I give props to 187 who probably realize gun-game alone won't win there battles. This is New Eden - gotta do what you gotta do. Same with my Logi-LAV.

First off, I gotta give HS props for sticking to the agreement of no Flaylocks + contact nades. Good fights.

I'll like to share an Alliance wide mail in EoN:

"ALL USERS WILL BE TEAMKILLED ON SIGHT"

That's how dedicated EoN is to having good clean fun. Now I'm aware LoI isn't just HS, but I was under the impression that this agreement was a blanket one... all corps in EoN and all corps in LoI. But i guess not.

Just played 187 (on an undercover cop!) and fused and core flaylocks were used. A couple of my corpmates switched to using them, I didn't. Just to be clear, is this the official stance from 187?

Should SyNergy go into every 187 match with our gaylock pistols in tow from the start?

At this point, I'm caring less and less...being honest. The fact that people need to rely on crutches like that to try and win brings a smile to my face.

So unless I get word on this, I'm to assume 187 are flaylock, fused nades carrying "beast" players.

Let me give an unpopular opinion on this whole 'truce' thing.

TP and other EoN corps rely a lot on shotgunners and heavies - basically CQC. What's the counter? Either use it yourself or explode them.

This truce favors EoN play style over LoI mid range play style. It was in very bad strategic taste that this agreement was made and I laughed hard at LoI when I heard about it.

I give props to 187 who probably realize gun-game alone won't win there battles. This is New Eden - gotta do what you gotta do. Same with my Logi-LAV.

#1 You've played us twice. Maybe? We have a pretty balanced approach to roles.
#2 Core flaylocks are cheese crutches.
#3 Add Pro Hic to the "Spineless Coreflaylock Cowards" list.
#4 If you want to make yourself a target, flaylock spam. Better hope you win or have a district on PFC... because these are going to be your last defenses. No quarter. No surrender.

You are killing the game. It isn't the least bit fun with flaylock spam. YOU ARE KILLING THE GAME.

I took part in 4 PC matches yesterday again EON Corps and some of your guys were using gaylock and contact grenades. Not many but a few in two of the matches. I guess there will always be rogue players who dont want to give them up.

#1 You've played us twice. Maybe? We have a pretty balanced approach to roles.
#2 Core flaylocks are cheese crutches.
#3 Add Pro Hic to the "Spineless Coreflaylock Cowards" list.
#4 If you want to make yourself a target, flaylock spam. Better hope you win or have a district on PFC... because these are going to be your last defenses. No quarter. No surrender.

You are killing the game. It isn't the least bit fun with flaylock spam. YOU ARE KILLING THE GAME.

I took part in 4 PC matches yesterday again EON Corps and some of your guys were using gaylock and contact grenades. Not many but a few in two of the matches. I guess there will always be rogue players who dont want to give them up.

LMAO, this game was dead long before Flaylock spam, its sad how desperate people clutch onto this game like it matters. Ive seen plenty of explosives, mass drivers and other CQC weaponry from plenty of corps. There is **** aim mechanics anyone actually thinks they are playing a comepetitive game rather than a bunch of retards flaling their arms about like they were sat on for hours and completely numb are just out of their head.

Still confused why anyone still cares, im quite certain PC will be done within the month.

LMAO, this game was dead long before Flaylock spam, its sad how desperate people clutch onto this game like it matters. Ive seen plenty of explosives, mass drivers and other CQC weaponry from plenty of corps. There is **** aim mechanics anyone actually thinks they are playing a comepetitive game rather than a bunch of retards flaling their arms about like they were sat on for hours and completely numb are just out of their head.

Still confused why anyone still cares, im quite certain PC will be done within the month.

#17Posted: 2013.07.17 01:56 | Report
Like
Ice Fitzy wrote:
I took part in 4 PC matches yesterday again EON Corps and some of your guys were using gaylock and contact grenades. Not many but a few in two of the matches. I guess there will always be rogue players who dont want to give them up.



Post some names? Call them out? We always record so we have video proof. ProHic fags used contact nades in first match the entire time. Than second fight they ALL used flux and MDs Coreflaylocks still got wrecked all they did was sit on top of A tower and spam MD and Coreflaylock it was the map with really high towers. 4 point.
QUOTE


I was a ringer so it didnt bother me as much as the defending corp guys, who were pissed. Also i wasnt sure until today if the agreement only included Teamplayers or all of EON. Now that i know it is all EON corps ill keep a pen handy.

I'll like to share an Alliance wide mail in EoN:

"ALL USERS WILL BE TEAMKILLED ON SIGHT"

Heh. some people thought i was joking when i sent that message. Then certain flaylocks users started getting shot in the back.

They need to compete somehow, kinda hard fighting against a corp like 100x better than them .

HONESTLY It's for whoever has skill. IF you need to read a document telling you not to use cheap stuff..YOU ARE DOING IT WRONG!!!! You should avoid using that stuff in the first place because you don't need it. Have some pride lose with honor. IF somebody has to tell you and make a agreement for you not to use clearly OP crutches you are garbage... It shouldn't of needed to be a agreement in the first place.

You guys can go ahead and lose with honor, we'll gladly take the win. XD

The agreement was TP and HellStorm. This is New Eden, not ******* Disneyland, you do what you have to do to win. We are in a war, if you forgot, we are gonna try to win however we can. If Flaylocks and Fused Locus grenades help us win, that's how you should do it, and I would expect you guys to do the same. Personally, I don't use either, but I completely understand why people do and agree.