|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals
20
   |
Posted - 2013.07.11 17:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Every match is annoying me too much, i'm not that good but putting me v people with much better gear and SP every game is too much, im a sore loser being honest here, i can take a defeat if the game has been close but a total annihilation when i've been able to do nothing other than drop uplinks nano's revive and rep and and constantly getting negative K/D ratio's is far too frustrating for me so I refuse to play a game that annoys me as much as this does so i'm taking a long break until matchmaking is fixed, I play games for enjoyment and i get none from this game right now, it's a shame because I liked the concept but the execution has been terrible so I think i'll just focus on playing EVE ...
I haven't insulted anyone or blamed any particular class or type of person so please don;t see this as a QQ rage quit thread, I simply am not enjoying the game and it has very little to offer new players, I want to be able to compete in the matches I play and saying go be a sniper go do this go do that .. defeats the object of a game, why should I have to go down the route of a specific class to keep me out of the battle because of the sheer difference in SP between your opponents ? I absolutely hate being in a part of a squad and being the weak link, I don;t like to feel that i'm basically being carried and am a liability to the squad, Being weak at the start of a game is fine when there is some kind of balance so that your always able to compete in matches, being weak at the start of the game when your v ppl who've been here for over a year isn't fine .. It's the equivalent of putting a 5yr old child into a boxing ring with Klitschko and telling the kid to .. get good ..
In EVE new players don't get a frigate and then go straight into battles v Titans .. yet on Dust that seems to be the route you've gone down .. why ? You do realise there is a reason barely any MMO games (I cant actually think of any but i'm sure someone somewhere knows of at least 1) throw new players into the lions den straight away ? It puts people off wanting to play the game and stay long enough to get hooked.
A large proportion of the experienced players on this game don't see anything wrong with the current system and bemoan the size of the player base and say ' any seperation is bad for the game' that's bollox, the reason the player base is so small is because the current system drives new players away and seeing as there are alot of ppl in high lvl gears with alot of SP now i seriously doubt their would be a problem with seperating games between players based on SP all it would mean is the new players would play v the new players and the vets would play v the vets (obviously I see the issue here ... the ppl who complain about this type of syystem are the ones scared to lose ISK by fighting ppl at a similair lvl to them, all those who gloat about their KD ratios are against this kind of system because without new players for them to kill easily their KD/s will go down as they will be against ppl on an equal footing to them) The best players of this game see no issue with this kind of system, it puts the game back to the lvl where skill and dropsuit fitting matters rather than the SP is God system currently in place.
Every idea i've ever had re Matchmaking has been shotdown with the same complaints by the same ppl who seem to think the game is fine as it is ... The game isn;t fine as it is and the player base confirms that, the last paragraph was directly aimed at the ppl who will undoubtedly QQ the idea .... I never claimed to be good at the game, I don't want to be given an easy ride to 10m SP and given prot gear ... I merely want balanced matches between balanced sets of players
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1010425#post1010425 Matchmaking solution + New game mode idea |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 17:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:You wrote a 5 page essay about how matchmaking is bad and you're taking a long break.
Ok.
I think you have some serious problems if you think what I wrote was a 5 page essay and I explained why I thought matchmaking was bad because merely saying .. This is bad .. is pathetic
The difference between a QQ and having a discussion about a problem is explaining WHY it's a problem and I only said i'm going to have a break til it's fixed, just saying i'm having a break game is bad is never going to get the reasons to why i'm having a break resolved are they ?
|
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 18:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
Skipper Jones wrote:Rinzler XVII wrote:Skipper Jones wrote:You wrote a 5 page essay about how matchmaking is bad and you're taking a long break.
Ok. I think you have some serious problems if you think what I wrote was a 5 page essay and I explained why I thought matchmaking was bad because merely saying .. This is bad .. is pathetic The difference between a QQ and having a discussion about a problem is explaining WHY it's a problem and I only said i'm going to have a break til it's fixed, just saying i'm having a break game is bad is never going to get the reasons to why i'm having a break resolved are they ? THAT was no discussion. You basically said "It's unfair for these players to get pub stomped" You never gave a way to fix it. Your last paragraph was basically the whole summary of your 5 paragraph long speech about the same thing. Yeah you explained it was a problem. EVERYONE knows that. You basically reiterated old information through 5 paragraphs. You didn't need to make that big of a deal about KNOWN information just to say "I'll be back when it's fixed"
1. uhm .. I merely asked for balanced matches, I never said it was unfair I just said the system is broke and it turns new players away .. which it does
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1010425#post1010425
There you go thats my full explanation of a solution I have for this problem as well as a new game mode idea however the reason I didn;t repost that here is because it's full of information and I can;t add anything else to it as it's at the character limit
2.This whole post is a summary post and the last paragraph of any statement you make should always be a summary of your general point so if you just want to get the general gist of whats being said you read the last paragraph and if you want a bit more info you read all the way through it
3.Some people don;t see matchmaking as a problem, just because 1 person knows it's a problem doesn;t mean EVERYONE knows it's a problem and i could quite easily link you to various posts where ppl are clearly arguing that it ISN'T a problem
4.Freedom of Speech just as your free to disagree with my points i'm free to actually make them in the 1st place ... Your welcome to continue trolling though i'm extremely relaxed right now so I wish you luck with this endeavour |
Rinzler XVII
Forsaken Immortals
20
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 18:16:00 -
[4] - Quote
Maximus Stryker wrote:So I didn't read the post but i did read the title. Therefore I cannot say I disagree with everything you wrote, can say that I disagree with your claim in the title.
Is DUST the perfect game? No, perfection is not actually attainable, it is the efforts to get there and how close you come. I enjoy Dust very much and support CCP in their efforts to continually improve it.
Also, It is likely I will not check back on this thread so don't feel the need to respond as I wont receive your feedback.
Sorry I read up to 'So I didn't read the post but i did read the title' and decided to not read any further, if you don't have the decency to read the post and only read the title then I don't want to hear what you have to say |
|
|
| |
|