|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2352
   |
Posted - 2013.07.09 00:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
How about we just lower the ammo capacity to cut down on spam instead of making sweeping changes. 23 shots is pretty high for an explosive based weapon with a low reload time. I only get 18 on the MD, 24 on the assault at the cost of damage. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2352
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 00:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:Because ammo capacity will never cut spam as long as supply depots and nanohives are around.
So basically you want the flaylock to be another HAV, Dropship, and Laser? |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2352
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 00:56:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dagger-Two wrote:Cosgar wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Because ammo capacity will never cut spam as long as supply depots and nanohives are around. So basically you want the flaylock to be another HAV, Dropship, and Laser? Not sure what you mean. I'm saying it needs to be a pistol first and foremost, a precision weapon with the highest damage in its category, at the expense of requiring a little more finesse to use, and a lower ammo count than the other pistols. I'm saying it should be a unique weapon, and not a smaller mass driver.
I mean the above mentioned were nerfed into the ground by sweeping changes. Sweeping changes are what made Uprising so unbearable. The flaylock already requires finesse since you have to lead your shots at mid range, but 23 shots is way too much for such a powerful weapon.
Also, the flaylock is anything but a mini MD. I compare it to missile turrets in closed beta. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2353
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 00:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Darken-Sol wrote:Cosgar wrote:Dagger-Two wrote:Because ammo capacity will never cut spam as long as supply depots and nanohives are around. So basically you want the flaylock to be another HAV, Dropship, and Laser? Its gonna get nerfed. You cant have a side arm dominating a battle field every game forever. Its everyones fault for wreaking as much havok as they can with it. That lesson never sank in when they lost their TAC ARs and proto tanks. People will take the path of least resistance and pay for it later. Its gonna be funny when they are here crying. They had a few weeks of fun and ruined a great weapon by getting it classified as OP.
I just hope they don't move to my beloved Ishukone SMG. I'm still trying to skill back into it. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
2357
|
Posted - 2013.07.09 04:32:00 -
[5] - Quote
Dexter307 wrote:Change the splash radius of all flaylocks to 1.5m
Make flaylocks use more pg
?Reduce the range?
Ive used the basic, advanced,and proto flaylock and the only one thats OP is the proto, the other ones are fine.
Aren't all proto weapons OP? |
|
|
| |
|