|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers EoN.
572
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 05:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Definitely not. |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers EoN.
573
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 05:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
James-5955 wrote:Novawolf McDustingham The514th wrote:James-5955 wrote:I agree, Dust really isn't all that tactical.
You get that huge EHP to work with, you can make a mistake, engage in a fight that you shouldn't of, get outnumbered, whatever, in most cases you can turn around and run away and you have plenty of time to react thanks to the TTK (time to kill) in this game; especially now that weapons have been nerfed so many times. Sure you can use tactics, but that goes for ANY shooter game.
I don't see a whole lot tactical about the gameplay that I usually see in Dust, nor do I see it really necessary in average matches. In LOU, unless playing against complete scrubs I still feel it's necessary to crouch walk a lot, check corners, proceed carefully, and pick my fights wisely. I hardly had that feeling in Dust, only in very few pubs that were high competition and corp battles against top corps.
I was always able to run and gun and play stupidly and consistently do well in Dust... That is rarely the case in a tactical shooter unless the enemy is literally brand new to shooters.
Also, how often to you ADS in Dust? In a tactical shooter, you are not going to do very well unless you ADS. I ADSed a lot in Dust actually, but I know it wasn't really necessary a lot of the time. It annoyed me greatly because I knew that hipfiring was usually more effective than ADS unless at a decent range. There would be moments where I'd go and hipfire and be surprised at how good it was, and it would annoy me at the same time. I found the same true for MAG as well at times. I can understand hipfire being better than ADS when they're within shotgun range, but further and it's just stupid IMHO.
Hope all is well with you James. |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers EoN.
573
|
Posted - 2013.06.28 05:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
James-5955 wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:James-5955 wrote:Novawolf McDustingham The514th wrote:James-5955 wrote:I agree, Dust really isn't all that tactical.
You get that huge EHP to work with, you can make a mistake, engage in a fight that you shouldn't of, get outnumbered, whatever, in most cases you can turn around and run away and you have plenty of time to react thanks to the TTK (time to kill) in this game; especially now that weapons have been nerfed so many times. Sure you can use tactics, but that goes for ANY shooter game.
I don't see a whole lot tactical about the gameplay that I usually see in Dust, nor do I see it really necessary in average matches. In LOU, unless playing against complete scrubs I still feel it's necessary to crouch walk a lot, check corners, proceed carefully, and pick my fights wisely. I hardly had that feeling in Dust, only in very few pubs that were high competition and corp battles against top corps.
I was always able to run and gun and play stupidly and consistently do well in Dust... That is rarely the case in a tactical shooter unless the enemy is literally brand new to shooters.
Also, how often to you ADS in Dust? In a tactical shooter, you are not going to do very well unless you ADS. I ADSed a lot in Dust actually, but I know it wasn't really necessary a lot of the time. It annoyed me greatly because I knew that hipfiring was usually more effective than ADS unless at a decent range. There would be moments where I'd go and hipfire and be surprised at how good it was, and it would annoy me at the same time. I found the same true for MAG as well at times. I can understand hipfire being better than ADS when they're within shotgun range, but further and it's just stupid IMHO. Hope all is well with you James. Oh yeah all is good, aside from work soaking up too much time and wanting to game more than I do xD. Hope teamplayers is working out well for you, good to see you getting in some good matches. GJ vs IMPs.
Thanks man. |
|
|
|