|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 178 post(s) |
Not Iggy
Nos Nothi
0
   |
Posted - 2014.01.20 05:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Applied to EF.EZ
I cant see the boards so I assume its a time delay thing. Ill read up tomorrow.
IgniteableAura
|
Not Iggy
Nos Nothi
44
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 21:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spademan wrote:Timeline's gone live on Nos Nothi. At present it contains events from the first 100 pages (All I could get through in one day) and some from beyond, any assistance would be welcomed. So go check it out 
Go reserve a couple posts after your original one mate. Just in case
Not double posting like a Kaiser, because...this isn't me.
IgniteableAura
|
Not Iggy
Nos Nothi
72
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 14:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Gal scout with reflex plates?
Anyways there been arguments that a cal scout may be the only thing able to scan down a maxed stealth scout while cloaked, I haven't sat down the math yet.
We (Cal scouts) will need a small buff to precision to pull that off.
I don't even think we have the CPU to fit 4....
IgniteableAura
|
Not Iggy
Nos Nothi
74
|
Posted - 2014.03.10 20:14:00 -
[4] - Quote
Llast 326 wrote:
Here is the question that is on my mind.
When we were arguing for scout buff part of the reason was that we were to easily countered by scanners. Essentially Scanners had no counter, ow that that is no longer the case, the discussion has turned to that the Cal scout has one counter?
Perhaps IWS can answer this (perhaps NDA no)
DId CCP intend for Gal Scout to be one counter to the Cal Scout?
We used to use the argument that if you had situational awareness you could still spot a scout, but we are forgoing that argument for the Cal scout, whys that? The cloak, would be my guess, but situational awareness is still valid in that situation to a degree.
So what is the priority amount scouts
Stealth > Passive Scan
Passive Scan > Stealth
I honestly don't know what should be the priority
Looking at this as what benefits all scouts
I am a Bastard above all else.
Its ALWAYS better to be unseen. So the Gal wins over the Cal every day. The Gal only needs to fit two complex PE to see all the other scouts. The Cal needs to fit 4 cPE to see the Gal. Again its better to be unseen than see others IMO. Because with the current scout meta, it will likely be one or the other. (see others or be unseen)
In that sense the Gal scout is probably the best "scout" IMO. It has the scan range to hunt a majority of other frames and can stay hidden from all but the most drastic and dedicated scanners. All the other scouts will likely be seen to some extent.
In that sense I feel the Gal is likely to be a bit OP as it has no real drawbacks (slot layout is ideal, innate reps, good pg/cpu etc.). But time will tell.
IgniteableAura
|
Not Iggy
Nos Nothi
91
|
Posted - 2014.03.25 19:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yea I have been running precision in my highs to pick up cloaked scouts and ranges in my lows so I can see them way off.
http://www.protofits.com/fittings/view/382/2182
You don't need tank as you just stay cloaked. Scout playstyle is still maintained so its nothing new, just the fact you can sit in the middle of a field and wait for a whole group of dudes to walk right past you cloaked thinking they are "hot stuff"
IgniteableAura
|
|
|
| |
|