|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 03:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 12:39:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mobius Wyvern wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. Not sure if trolling or completely ******* ********. Not sure if you know what trolling is and I'm not sure if you know what the rules of the forums are because you have violated them. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 12:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:You're either a troll or very ignorant about what its like for tankers. I recommend making an alt account and skill into tanks to see the massive SP and ISK costs associated with tanks, and to see how easily all that ISK can be destroyed by much cheaper prototype AV weapons. You don't know the rules of the forums because you have violated them and you have no idea what it is like to have 3 people with prototype grenades and prototype swarm launchers try to take out an prototype LAV/HAV. I recommend that you play the game more and put some skill into your AV grenades along with your Swarm Launcher to see how much little damage it does to counter the HAV and LAV. The SP and ISK costs associated with the LAV and HAV are irrelevant. Your argument is invalid due to your close mindedness and bias opinion. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 12:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Aiko Morningstar wrote:first of all, not to be mean but...are u a moron? i mean come on use militia swarms on on the vehichles for one. two AV aint gonna work on all of em. caldari tanks need flux grenades cause they take out shields. AV grenades are needed more on Gallenete because its explosive aka-armor killer!. not to mention bob and weave son! a single proto swarm launcher can destroy a a logi lav in like to shots. hell ive seen cause i was in it when it went critical(jumped of the gunner seat like a boss though) as far as tanks as long as theyre not Marauder level (of which ive only seen two people EVER use to win) then u have nothing much to worry about. its called synergy in teams my friend If you didn't want to be mean then you wouldn't call someone a moron which is a violation of the rules of the forums. You contradicted yourself also because you can't not be mean and call someone a name at the same time. Militia Swarm Launchers do such little damage to the LAV and HAV that are prototype and advanced. If you had took your time to read my first post then you would know that I have already tried that and have proven your theory wrong. A prototype Swarm Launcher does as much damage as a Militia Swarm Launcher because I took the time to look at the stats. You argument is invalid. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Void Echo wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. there are no advanced or prototype HAVs in this game. only militia and standard Now that is incorrect. I actually took the time to look this one up and there are two types of HAV which are Enforcer and Standard. I said advanced and prototype but you know what I mean so this is irrelevant and doesn't make my argument invalid. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Cross Atu wrote:darkiller240 wrote:Aiko Morningstar wrote:first of all, not to be mean but...are u a moron? i mean come on use militia swarms on on the vehichles for one. two AV aint gonna work on all of em. caldari tanks need flux grenades cause they take out shields. AV grenades are needed more on Gallenete because its explosive aka-armor killer!. not to mention bob and weave son! a single proto swarm launcher can destroy a a logi lav in like to shots. hell ive seen cause i was in it when it went critical(jumped of the gunner seat like a boss though) as far as tanks as long as theyre not Marauder level (of which ive only seen two people EVER use to win) then u have nothing much to worry about. its called synergy in teams my friend There is no such thing as increased damage on amour or shield that stuuf is in eve and hasent been implemented yet There are weapons currently in Dust 514 which do more damage against armor or shields and less against the other. Explosives such as AV nades and swarms do more damage to armor HP than shields. Weapons like the scram and laser do more damage to shields than armor. Hybrid weapons do solid damage to both tho it seems like they are slightly weighted toward shields tho they maintain high values against both. That is incorrect. Explosives such as AV grenades and Swarm Launchers do the same amount of damage to shields and armor. I actually went to the Marketplace on the game and looked at the stats. There is no indication in the stats that states that your theory is correct. Your argument is invalid. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Lightning Bolt2 wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. Prob a noob from starhawk or PS2 used to easily killing tanks with his rocket launcher in one - 3 shots. then coming to Dust 514 meeting 1 good tanker or LAV driver and doesnt kill them with 1 AV nade. >assuming that I'm a noob from Starhawk or PS2. >never played Starhawk >not a noob in PS2 >been playing it for over 5 months now and I have been told by numerous of people in my Outfit that I am very good at the game >claims that I only used 1 AV grenade on a Enforcer HAV or a Scout/Logistics LAV >didn't read that I had stated that I used multiple grenades while having multiple people using the same thing as me with Swarm Launchers >yourargumentisinvalid.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Shadow Archeus wrote:Honestly they need to rename av nades to anti armor nades......heavy shields take less damage from av nades you want to flux shields and av armor .......swarms are anti armor mostly while forge guns are anti shield Now, I took the time to look at the damage that the Flux grenades do to shields. The Prototype Flux grenades do a total of 1800 while the Standard ones do 1200. I'm going to have to start using these and I'm glad you pointed this out to me as it will help me destroy the shields but the LAV and HAV can easily just have their shields regenerated. Planetside 2 never had any shields on their vehicles so it is tough to take out a vehicle in the first place so they need to take shields out of the game for vehicles in order to balance this out. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:43:00 -
[9] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Newman Robinson wrote: If you didn't want to be mean then you wouldn't call someone a moron which is a violation of the rules of the forums. You contradicted yourself also because you can't not be mean and call someone a name at the same time. Militia Swarm Launchers do such little damage to the LAV and HAV that are prototype and advanced. If you had took your time to read my first post then you would know that I have already tried that and have proven your theory wrong. A prototype Swarm Launcher does as much damage as a Militia Swarm Launcher because I took the time to look at the stats. You argument is invalid.
Except that having 6 missiles instead of 4 per volley makes it a 50% dmg increase from STD to PRO wich is more of a boost than what most other PRO weapons get. I don't condone name calling but i can understand that people get angry when you make demands based on ignorance on the subject. Also: Newman Robinson wrote:Void Echo wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. there are no advanced or prototype HAVs in this game. only militia and standard Now that is incorrect. I actually took the time to look this one up and there are two types of HAV which are Enforcer and Standard. I said advanced and prototype but you know what I mean so this is irrelevant and doesn't make my argument invalid. It actually is correct. There are no ADV or PRO type HAVs in the game as of now and no, we do not know what you mean if you state falsehoods based on what i would describe kindly as a lax use terminology. It's no one else's fault than yours if you don't do proper research before putting your ideas up to the scrutiny of your fellow posters. That is not a 50% damage increase so you're wrong. That is a 20% damage increase which isn't a whole lot. The Militia Swarm Launcher does have 4 missiles per shot which comes out to 1320 if all of the missiles hit the LAV or HAV while the Prototype Swarm Launcher has 6 missiles per shot which comes out to 1980. >assumes I make claims based on ignorance on the subject >didn't take the time to read my first post which indicates that multiple tactics were used to destroy the Enforcer HAV and Logistic LAV with multiple Militia Swarm Launchers which do more than 6 times the damage of the Prototype AV grenades while having little to no effect on the shields or armor You're in denial and your argument has become invalid because that isn't correct at all to say there are two types of HAV which are Militia and Standard when I have the proof right on my TV screen that says otherwise. Would you like a screenshot? If you don't know what I mean then you should of asked if I meant Enforcer/Standard HAV and Scout/Logistic/Standard LAV but you didn't so you only assumed that I was stating falsehoods based on what you describe as lax terminology. Terminology doesn't have to be lax in order for some people to understand it. It is not my fault because I actually did do the research and I ask questions when I don't fully understand something before making a statement about it unlike yourself. |
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 16:14:00 -
[10] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:*snip because of quote limit* Since the rest of your reply is one huge strawman and a repetition of fallacies you have already been called out on, i will focus on just one thing and rest my case: Given: STD=1320 PRO=1980 Determine how many % of STD are in PRO. Calculation: PRO/STD*100=x We fill the variables: 1980/1320*100= 150% >claims that my reply is flawed >must be in denial >must be jealous that I'm smart enough to figure out the math of the equation while having the actual art of knowing how to debate in a professional matter >didn't bother to read the whole thread otherwise he would of noticed that everything that I've been called out on has been proven wrong >Irestmycase.jpg >MFW I notice that this calculation makes no sense and has nothing to do with the argument >Click here for a picture of the face. |
|
Newman Robinson
Soldiers Of One Network Orion Empire
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 16:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:I am sick and tired of seeing prototype or advanced LAVs and HAVs when my advanced AV grenades do so little damage to them. All of the Swarm Launchers do the same damage and do more damage than the prototype AV grenades. It's all about getting those logistic LAVs now since you're basically unstoppable. I demand that you fix this. Two things 1. There are no Such thing as ADV and PROTO LAVs and HAVs. there are the Glass Cannon Enforcer, or the Radically Annoying LLAV. But there are no ADV and PROTO Vehicles. 2. Why is everybody trying to use AV nades as their Primary AV Weapon? Remember Star Wars Battlefront 1? Remember those Concussive Grenades? Those are our AV Nades. You are Supposed to run from HAVs! Or Get a Swarm, which Deals 1500+ Damage to the Vehicles. AV Nades are there so you can go and Randomly throw them at Vehicles to put a Smudge of Damage on them while you are Running away. We have already went over this before if you bothered to read the whole thread. I never played SWB1. According to your logic, if those AV grenades are suppose to put a "smudge" of damage on them while I'm running away then I wouldn't be able to kill a Militia LAV or a Militia HAV with just a couple of AV Grenades. |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:13:00 -
[12] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:Quote:>assuming that I'm a noob from Starhawk or PS2. >never played Starhawk >not a noob in PS2 >been playing it for over 5 months now and I have been told by numerous of people in my Outfit that I am very good at the game >claims that I only used 1 AV grenade on a Enforcer HAV or a Scout/Logistics LAV >didn't read that I had stated that I used multiple grenades while having multiple people using the same thing as me with Swarm Launchers >yourargumentisinvalid.jpg You know, if you Stopped protecting your wrongedness, we could go on to a New Thread and Not have to Argue over the Truth. You Need to Stop being the forum Police about us being "Meanies" and start to Realize that everyone is a "Meanie". So, as a Rip-off of another Idiot Forum Warrior >You Assume that from Experience in other Games that AV weapons will be Stong, and Potent >Upon Learning otherwise you ran to the Forums and complained with Unfocused arguments and lack of Solution Suggestion. >I've Been Playing Dust for 6 Months, and I'm still ****** at playing it. >You Didn't Read the Info About the Swarm enough, or else you would have realized what we already know, and we wouldn't have to beat it into your head with an Orbital >AV Nades Should Never have been put in, as it gives an Assault 3 Roles, where ever other role can only do one thing at a time.>Youarguementwasalwaysinvalid.failwhale.xxx.com You know, if you stopped being in denial then we could go on about our business. >assumes I'm the forum police >assumes I called someone a "meanie" >tries to copy me >assumes I'm complaining while being unfocused and have a lack of solution to the problem >didn't take the time to read that I had said that the game developers need to fix the problem themselves >tries to do the .jpg >fails horribly >you'redoingitwrong.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:17:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bhavesh Prajapat wrote:IDC whether it has already been bought up here I am FUMING that you think that Tanks are OP. Here is why you are already wrong:
1) Shield is better at defending missiles/swarm launchers/AV grenades but succumbs to flux grenades (TIP) and FG/CA Installation
My tank is only STD and it can take maybe 100 DMG from a AV grenade, why? because I skilled that way - and I have the right modules.
2) Armor is the opposite, better at warding of FG/RG but succumbs to AV Grenades, missiles, and SL
If you think tanks are OP, you should inspect what type of Tank it is FIRST
Skill into the right areas if you want to AV.
Bhavesh >assumes I'm wrong >HAV/LAV are OP because it takes 4 prototype Swarm Launchers to take them out >doesn't want to acknowledge this because he's in denial >MFW people continue to try and argue with me when I keep winning every argument >MFW I haven't been proven wrong yet >facepalm.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Yeah marauders were good but maybe they were a little op they work a bit different in eve. And yea the enforcer are terrible considering all tanks have been nerfed by 20% damage. Marauders in Dust are supposed to be the Dreds in EVE, which is why many people (including me) want seige modules for them. Anyways, this guy is a joke for thinking at AV is UP and that there's a PROTO vehicle. There isn't one, and They are not UP. Troll dectcted, and shot down. Peace, Godin >assumes I'm a joke >didn't bother to read the whole thread >didn't see that I said that there are only two types of HAV's which include Standard and Enforcer and there are three types of LAV which include Scout, Logistics, and Standard >assumes I'm trying to **** people off >MFW this guy didn't bother to read the rules of the forums where it says that trolling is not allowed >facepalm.jpg >assumes I got shot down >just got shot down himself |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:32:00 -
[15] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote:You're either a troll or very ignorant about what its like for tankers. I recommend making an alt account and skill into tanks to see the massive SP and ISK costs associated with tanks, and to see how easily all that ISK can be destroyed by much cheaper prototype AV weapons. You don't know the rules of the forums because you have violated them and you have no idea what it is like to have 3 people with prototype grenades and prototype swarm launchers try to take out an prototype LAV/HAV. I recommend that you play the game more and put some skill into your AV grenades along with your Swarm Launcher to see how much little damage it does to counter the HAV and LAV. The SP and ISK costs associated with the LAV and HAV are irrelevant. Your argument is invalid due to your close mindedness and bias opinion. You're talking to the guys who are vets, know the game inside and out, and has played (most likely) every class there is. Please be quiet and walk. And just to let you know, I use ADV swarms and STD AV grenades, and eaisly down HAV's. YOu sir suck. Also, like we have told you, there is no suck thing as a PROTO HAV. Peace, Godin >assumes he is a vet >assumes he knows the game inside and out >assumes he has played every class >I remember watching the trailer for this game >remember watching the part where a game developer says there is endless amounts of different classes that you can choose from >MFW this guy thinks he has played them all when he hasn't >laughingwhilelookingatthescreen.jpg >assumes I'm just going to do as he says and be quiet while walking away >assumes he can take out and maxed out HAV with his ADV Swarm Launcher and STD AV grenades >assumes I suck >didn't bother to read the whole thread >didn't see that I said that there are only two types of HAV's which include Standard and Enforcer |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:34:00 -
[16] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:Cross Atu wrote:darkiller240 wrote:Aiko Morningstar wrote:first of all, not to be mean but...are u a moron? i mean come on use militia swarms on on the vehichles for one. two AV aint gonna work on all of em. caldari tanks need flux grenades cause they take out shields. AV grenades are needed more on Gallenete because its explosive aka-armor killer!. not to mention bob and weave son! a single proto swarm launcher can destroy a a logi lav in like to shots. hell ive seen cause i was in it when it went critical(jumped of the gunner seat like a boss though) as far as tanks as long as theyre not Marauder level (of which ive only seen two people EVER use to win) then u have nothing much to worry about. its called synergy in teams my friend There is no such thing as increased damage on amour or shield that stuuf is in eve and hasent been implemented yet There are weapons currently in Dust 514 which do more damage against armor or shields and less against the other. Explosives such as AV nades and swarms do more damage to armor HP than shields. Weapons like the scram and laser do more damage to shields than armor. Hybrid weapons do solid damage to both tho it seems like they are slightly weighted toward shields tho they maintain high values against both. That is incorrect. Explosives such as AV grenades and Swarm Launchers do the same amount of damage to shields and armor. I actually went to the Marketplace on the game and looked at the stats. There is no indication in the stats that states that your theory is correct. Your argument is invalid. It doesn't say it, but it's true. You're clearly new to all of this, Welcome to New Eden bluedot. >assumes that it's true >has no proof to back up his theory >assumes that I'm new to this >been playing since 5/14/2013 >assumes that I'm always a blue dot >doesn't know that I'm in a corporation |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:40:00 -
[17] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Newman Robinson wrote:*snip because of quote limit* Since the rest of your reply is one huge strawman and a repetition of fallacies you have already been called out on, i will focus on just one thing and rest my case: Given: STD=1320 PRO=1980 Determine how many % of STD are in PRO. Calculation: PRO/STD*100=x We fill the variables: 1980/1320*100= 150% >claims that my reply is flawed >must be in denial >must be jealous that I'm smart enough to figure out the math of the equation while having the actual art of knowing how to debate in a professional matter >didn't bother to read the whole thread otherwise he would of noticed that everything that I've been called out on has been proven wrong >Irestmycase.jpg >MFW I notice that this calculation makes no sense and has nothing to do with the argument > Click here for a picture of the face. Ok, you are either a troll or a great example of Dunning Kruger in action. I would still really be interested in this math you figured out all by yourself. Go ahead, prove that you're right by showing that 6/4 does not equal 1.5 in the decimal system. >assumes I'm a troll >assumes this could be the Dunning Kruger effect >GÇ£Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.GÇ¥ >from Einstein >didn't bother to read the whole thread since you haven't noticed the math of which I have already did >assumes I said that 6/4 doesn't equal 1.5 in the decimal system >MFW I noticed that you're just making stuff up >laughing.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:45:00 -
[18] - Quote
Aiko Morningstar wrote:alright plz stop feeding the troll. obviously this guy is one of maybe, what half a dozen? that have problems playing with rockets. damage is affected by whats its up against like shields or armor. nothing needs to be nerfed or buffed. try being in an lav while im shooting u up with missles and we'll see how easy it is for u to evade and not die. geez. >assumes I'm a troll >assumes I have problems with rockets >assumes that nothing needs to be nerfed or buffed >probably hasn't been playing this game for very long >played with multiple people from SVER True Blood >they have said the same thing I have said >assumes that my Militia LAV will withstand as much damage as a maxed out LAV would >mustbecrazy.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:48:00 -
[19] - Quote
Arx Ardashir wrote:It's been fun, Robinson. It was especially entertaining back when you just looked woefully ignorant, but the whole "6 is not 150% of 4" thing just ruinied the entire illusion. You stepped over the line and blew your cover, but you had a good run.
The "I've been playing for 6 weeks, totally not new" thing was a nice touch, though. >breaks the rules of the forums by calling someone a name >assumes I exactly said "6 is not 150% of 4" >assumes that I'm trying to create an illusion >must be living in an illusion himself >assumes I stepped over the line and blew my cover >assumes that I haven't been playing for over 6 weeks now >assumes that I'm new >wouldyoulikeapic?.jpg |
Newman Robinson
Dem Durrty Boyz
1
|
Posted - 2013.06.30 01:58:00 -
[20] - Quote
ladwar wrote:Arx Ardashir wrote:It's been fun, Robinson. It was especially entertaining back when you just looked woefully ignorant, but the whole "6 is not 150% of 4" thing just ruinied the entire illusion. You stepped over the line and blew your cover, but you had a good run.
The "I've been playing for 6 weeks, totally not new" thing was a nice touch, though. its much better once you hide the OP post because of his love to spam and reply personally to each and every post like it is correct when everyone who has played before open beta at just LOL at him because his post are just that bad. >assumes that I'm spamming >doesn't know what spamming is >should probably go read a dictionary >assumes that everyone who has played before 5/14/2013 is all "lol" about what I said >assumes my posts are bad |
|
|
|
|