| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
Interstellar Murder of Crows
421
   |
Posted - 2013.06.27 05:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
Should've just named the thread "Pets, the Dust Edition" |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
Interstellar Murder of Crows
423
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 12:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
IDGAF who is agreeing to be a pet, the deal you are offering is just that. "If you are willing to fight, we'll let you keep your District" sounds like renters with just a different type of rent.
If this really was the noble effort you were making it out to be, you'd be ensuring that only smaller corps without an Alliance would be getting a piece of the pie. Otherwise, all you've done is A) Create pets and/or B) Solidify the Blueberry Muffin that is sought in Molden Heath.
Sorry, laugh all you want but I call them as I see them. |
Alaika Arbosa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
Interstellar Murder of Crows
425
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 13:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Only reason I opened this thread was because I wanted to know why you wanted my corp and I to DIAF.
No real interest in PC at all until it isn't a broken mess of a passive faucet.
TBH, the passive nature of it is the most broken aspect of it all if you ask me. I remember reading about how "wanting PvE is wanting Farmville". I think of it differently, wanting Passive is wanting Farmville.
The inclusion of PvE and removal of Passive Income Generation (PIG for short) will do more for this game than the retention of PIG. Districts should open invadable anoms which need to be defended and plexed to gather the wealth that would otherwise come from PIG under the current system. They should be available only in held Districts and plexable by any who can get to the District. The value of the daily bounties available should total the amount of daily Income available under PIG, though it will force corps to "work" for their income though not only PvE, but also PvPvE.
In closing, anyone who is considering this foolishness should really think again and do yourselves a favor, don't submit to their rental terms. |
| |
|