Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
5aEKUXeRJGJ27kCDnDVYak3 wrote:Syther Shadows wrote: r u a alt ?
Yes I'm a secret CCP alt I'm here to build Rome! Stop complaining because we are fixing Dust in 10 years! So come back in 10 years! I'm not complaining And your not a secret CCP alt
but you did not have to be a genius to see either of those points |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1994
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it... |
5aEKUXeRJGJ27kCDnDVYak3
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
136
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:40:00 -
[33] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it...
Another thing I want to say is Dust is not EVE, they are too different in nature so please stop applying CCP's EVE experience to this Dust thingy that's going on. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it...
are you real -poke-
this is unbelievable
its a valid point and constructive criticism
ok ~
but tbh im happy with where dust is at atm i like the whole PQ thing and i think that through dust eve can also expand the battles of dust i feel over time will become more important and it will effect eve one way or another
if not then i can say hey thanks for the ride
|
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:42:00 -
[35] - Quote
5aEKUXeRJGJ27kCDnDVYak3 wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it... Another thing I want to say is Dust is not EVE, they are too different in nature so please stop applying CCP's EVE experience to this Dust thingy that's going on.
1. the correct term is not Dust Thingy.
2. The experience ccp got from ten years of eve is integrity not just making space ship games.
3. thank you for saying please but i will not delete this thread nor can i in any formal way |
5aEKUXeRJGJ27kCDnDVYak3
Kinsho Swords Caldari State
136
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 07:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote: 1. the correct term is not Dust Thingy.
2. The experience ccp got from ten years of eve is integrity not just making space ship games.
3. thank you for saying please but i will not delete this thread nor can i in any formal way
1. okay 2. lol 3. You are very welcome. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1994
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 08:37:00 -
[37] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it... are you real -poke- this is unbelievable its a valid point and constructive criticism ok ~ but tbh im happy with where dust is at atm i like the whole PQ thing and i think that through dust eve can also expand the battles of dust i feel over time will become more important and it will effect eve one way or another if not then i can say hey thanks for the ride
So is mine. If you are happy with the foundation and just looking for polish, then it is worth sticking it out. If you are unhappy with some core direction choices, it won't magically get better over time. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 08:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it... are you real -poke- this is unbelievable its a valid point and constructive criticism ok ~ but tbh im happy with where dust is at atm i like the whole PQ thing and i think that through dust eve can also expand the battles of dust i feel over time will become more important and it will effect eve one way or another if not then i can say hey thanks for the ride So is mine. If you are happy with the foundation and just looking for polish, then it is worth sticking it out. If you are unhappy with some core direction choices, it won't magically get better over time.
i was talking about your point when i said valid point and constructive criticism of my point :P and thanks ~
but atm the core mechanics of dust are amazing to me a merc of war in a universe so big where pvp is already a big deal between small corps and big ones |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1994
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:11:00 -
[39] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:
i was talking about your point when i said valid point and constructive criticism of my point :P and thanks ~
but atm the core mechanics of dust are amazing to me a merc of war in a universe so big where pvp is already a big deal between small corps and big ones
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in. But alas, it still has the feeling of a blank slate of a game and I'm not sure how that is supposed to sustain my attention when there are a lot of games focused on fun shooting first around the corner instead of logistics. Don't get me wrong, the risk/reward is a "killer feature" for DUST, but it's poorly executed.
DUST definitely broke my heart though, and a few people, especially in PR, should be fired for derogatory treatment of customers and blatantly unrealistic expectations they gave the community. With RSI, Uber, and even SOE being much more customer friendly, I've certainly sent my money elsewhere and won't reconsider unless it truly does become good someday. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries Omega Commission
178
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:20:00 -
[40] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:EVE has improved graphically significantly over the years. The core gameplay has barely budged. Apply this same formula to DUST and ask if it is worth waiting 10 years for it... are you real -poke- this is unbelievable its a valid point and constructive criticism ok ~ but tbh im happy with where dust is at atm i like the whole PQ thing and i think that through dust eve can also expand the battles of dust i feel over time will become more important and it will effect eve one way or another if not then i can say hey thanks for the ride So is mine. If you are happy with the foundation and just looking for polish, then it is worth sticking it out. If you are unhappy with some core direction choices, it won't magically get better over time. i was talking about your point when i said valid point and constructive criticism of my point :P and thanks ~ but atm the core mechanics of dust are amazing to me a merc of war in a universe so big where pvp is already a big deal between small corps and big ones
core mechanics of what it wants to be or how it plays currently. If it is how it plays currently there will only you running around the map and AFKs playing hoping that it gets better in 10 years.
|
|
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:25:00 -
[41] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in. But alas, it still has the feeling of a blank slate of a game and I'm not sure how that is supposed to sustain my attention when there are a lot of games focused on fun shooting first around the corner instead of logistics. Don't get me wrong, the risk/reward is a "killer feature" for DUST, but it's poorly executed.
DUST definitely broke my heart though, and a few people, especially in PR, should be fired for derogatory treatment of customers and blatantly unrealistic expectations they gave the community. With RSI, Uber, and even SOE being much more customer friendly, I've certainly sent my money elsewhere and won't reconsider unless it truly does become good someday.
Build your relationships on the solid ground of TRUST By John C Maxwell
GÇ£To be trusted is a greater compliment than to be loved.GÇ¥ ~George MacDonald
im not judging you and im not going to lie there are more fun things to do than play dust and stuff like this im not telling people they should play dust and they are a noob if they think its bad
that in all honesty is just a stupid arrogant type of thing to do
I have seen feedback suggested by players become a reality
did you know in league of legends That was a HUGE DEAL but in dust 514
almost everything was requested by players on the IRC and the Forums so i see it as my job to stick with ccp |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries Omega Commission
178
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:27:00 -
[42] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in.
For me this is their biggest failure. The amount of info CCP has spouted saying this is coming down the line etc and never delivered is incredible.
I remember the forums all through closed beta. Whenever complaints came up fanbois would say this is a beta patience etc.CCP will deliver, look at Eve, we are only seeing a tiny percentage of the game - wait till it releases. CCP did nothing to dampen down expectations but rather ramped it up with promises of bigger and better content e.g. 1000s of expansive maps different every time, gun rig system, player trading, open market etc.
launch? Nothing. Same year old maps with a building here and there - same terrible core mechanics. CCP delivered??? |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:34:00 -
[43] - Quote
xAckie wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in.
For me this is their biggest failure. The amount of info CCP has spouted saying this is coming down the line etc and never delivered is incredible. I remember the forums all through closed beta. Whenever complaints came up fanbois would say this is a beta patience etc.CCP will deliver, look at Eve, we are only seeing a tiny percentage of the game - wait till it releases. CCP did nothing to dampen down expectations but rather ramped it up with promises of bigger and better content e.g. 1000s of expansive maps different every time, gun rig system, player trading, open market etc. launch? Nothing. Same year old maps with a building here and there - same terrible core mechanics. CCP delivered???
personally id say ccp are still working on this and still want this goal what other reason do they have to keep the game running
i would be surprised if they did it for the money i really would |
Michael Arck
sephiroth clones General Tso's Alliance
36
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 09:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
It's not a big deal but people will make it out to be one. |
Noc Tempre
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1994
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 10:01:00 -
[45] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in. But alas, it still has the feeling of a blank slate of a game and I'm not sure how that is supposed to sustain my attention when there are a lot of games focused on fun shooting first around the corner instead of logistics. Don't get me wrong, the risk/reward is a "killer feature" for DUST, but it's poorly executed.
DUST definitely broke my heart though, and a few people, especially in PR, should be fired for derogatory treatment of customers and blatantly unrealistic expectations they gave the community. With RSI, Uber, and even SOE being much more customer friendly, I've certainly sent my money elsewhere and won't reconsider unless it truly does become good someday.
Build your relationships on the solid ground of TRUST By John C Maxwell GÇ£To be trusted is a greater compliment than to be loved.GÇ¥ ~George MacDonald im not judging you and im not going to lie there are more fun things to do than play dust and stuff like this im not telling people they should play dust and they are a noob if they think its bad that in all honesty is just a stupid arrogant type of thing to do I have seen feedback suggested by players become a realitydid you know in league of legends That was a HUGE DEAL but in dust 514 almost everything was requested by players on the IRC and the Forums so i see it as my job to stick with ccp
Should come with a diet ad disclaimer for DUST 514. Not a typical experience. I've been behind a few features that got to the game, but by the time they arrived they were half baked. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
170
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 10:05:00 -
[46] - Quote
Noc Tempre wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:Noc Tempre wrote:
The big problem I have with DUST, is they seem to not have a cohesive vision for what it will be 10 years from now. They have a list of features but no unified package that connects them. It has been more or less a blank slate, which made it easy to dream in perfect ways it would eventually be filled in. But alas, it still has the feeling of a blank slate of a game and I'm not sure how that is supposed to sustain my attention when there are a lot of games focused on fun shooting first around the corner instead of logistics. Don't get me wrong, the risk/reward is a "killer feature" for DUST, but it's poorly executed.
DUST definitely broke my heart though, and a few people, especially in PR, should be fired for derogatory treatment of customers and blatantly unrealistic expectations they gave the community. With RSI, Uber, and even SOE being much more customer friendly, I've certainly sent my money elsewhere and won't reconsider unless it truly does become good someday.
Build your relationships on the solid ground of TRUST By John C Maxwell GÇ£To be trusted is a greater compliment than to be loved.GÇ¥ ~George MacDonald im not judging you and im not going to lie there are more fun things to do than play dust and stuff like this im not telling people they should play dust and they are a noob if they think its bad that in all honesty is just a stupid arrogant type of thing to do I have seen feedback suggested by players become a realitydid you know in league of legends That was a HUGE DEAL but in dust 514 almost everything was requested by players on the IRC and the Forums so i see it as my job to stick with ccp Should come with a diet ad disclaimer for DUST 514. Not a typical experience. I've been behind a few features that got to the game, but by the time they arrived they were half baked.
you answered this yourself
you saw what you wanted and ccp could not deliver that
|
mikegunnz
187. League of Infamy
620
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 12:27:00 -
[47] - Quote
@OP Re: your "Rome wasn't built in a day" title...
This is less like Rome, more like Mogadishu, Somalia. |
Sev Alcatraz
Bullet Cluster
278
|
Posted - 2013.06.24 12:36:00 -
[48] - Quote
Yes but rome had skilled architects where as dust as a lolocracy of Dev's who have no idea what there doing http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://i.imgur.com/xVyoSl.jpg&imgrefurl=http://ninjasandrobots.com/you-need-some-experience&h=490&w=640&sz=68&tbnid=uL_sKn0GWPdwZM:&tbnh=92&tbnw=120&zoom=1&usg=__KL1dnKzN8rnVfqvEGmeE7cbgYtI=&docid=qHdh2oIAXNwWcM&sa=X&ei=TT3IUeffHoi-qAGz3IG4Dg&ved=0CC4Q9QEwAA&dur=493 |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
176
|
Posted - 2013.06.25 10:04:00 -
[49] - Quote
do you think those architects where just born skilled or did they work hard to become skilled and then get paid to work at rome ? |
James-5955
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
203
|
Posted - 2013.06.25 16:08:00 -
[50] - Quote
Comparing this game to Rome is pretty funny. A+ for effort but in the end Dust is still only a mediocre shooter at best and will have to compete against other shooters that are already better. I don't expect Dust to eventually become a good or great game (in my standards) because I feel the core mechanics are flawed.
The main core mechanic that I dislike? The SP system. The games I remember being good didn't make you grind to have an advantage or grind to stay on par with other players. They'd give you unlockables and a leveling up system with some other unlockables that don't really make your character better but what you could unlock was well balanced with all the other items and just gave you a different weapon that required a different playstyle to use well.
That's how I like shooter games to be. I think that someone should be able to buy it, log on and the only real disadvantage they have is not knowing the maps well and not being quite used to controls/sensitivity. You know, stuff that comes with experience in a game. To someone new who joins in Dust it's BS, people are running around that have much stronger characters than you AND they know the game better, just stacking advantage on advantage. Yeah they *can* grind through it, but how long will it take to reach 8+ mil SP, especially without boosters? & in the end would it even be worth it when the game is mediocre anyway?
It's the same issue I had with EVE, you can join now but you are insanely behind the vets in SP and you shouldn't even attempt to PvP one of them 1v1. Just blob warfare, woo. & that doesn't even work in Dust since its a fixed player cap at 16 vs 16. Which is another disappointment, why are we STILL stuck at 16 vs 16?
Although honestly playercount doesn't matter to me much, hell I've been addicted to The Last of Us MP where it's only 4v4. But guess what? The game plays very well, it's not glitchy, it runs smoothly, it promotes teamwork/tactical play more than Dust, and it's overall simply more of an enjoyable experience.
Actually I'm going to go play that now.
I hope that CCP can turn Dust into a masterpiece but I'm not going to stick around and grind it out waiting. How does it feel to know that a big chunk of your playerbase is only playing the game to cap out on SP so they aren't behind when/IF the game finally becomes good? |
|
DeadlyAztec11
Max-Pain-inc
555
|
Posted - 2013.06.25 16:40:00 -
[51] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:no this is not a troll threat but i do have them ~ look up lav's need to be buffed but my point was when he said rome did not claim to be a city i assumed he mean that dust 514 was claiming to be a mmo.fps.rpg when he though it was not good enough for that so i used the comparison that farmville a ***** facebook flash game is classified as a mmo to make my point but then the comment rome did not claim to be a empire when it was a shack was made so i assumed he was talking about the trailers and hype around the game so i pointed out EVERY GAME in the history of 2010+ of gaming did that so ccp is allowed to regardless of what he thinks therefore making his point meaningless rome was not built in a day im not calling ccp is rome but im pointing out the nothing that is good will just show up now if you had half a brain you should have figured that out your self unless you still can't what im talking about then obv we are not on the same page and i have nothing left to say to you God! smh...
We are talking about how every fanboy of Dust is saying that this game has great gunplay, great vehicles, amazing core mechanics, good economics, good company-customer relations, how Dust 514 tops all other triple A titles and that anybody who can't appreciate how 'good' it is, is ignorant.
In reality, Dust is lacking in every aspect outside of future promises by CCP, which no other company has ever had the guts to give such audacious promises. This game cannot compete against the other shooters, at least not yet. Hence it should not call it self a 'city', while it has nothing more to offer than a small 'town'.
This , sir, is what we are speaking of. |
RoundEy3
Metal Mind Industries
129
|
Posted - 2013.06.25 16:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Rome wasn't built in a day, but it took the Allies 4 years to bring down the Axis powers in WW2.
How many years has CCP been working on DUST now??? |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
177
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
RoundEy3 wrote:Rome wasn't built in a day, but it took the Allies 4 years to bring down the Axis powers in WW2.
How many years has CCP been working on DUST now???
about a day |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
177
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:08:00 -
[54] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:no this is not a troll threat but i do have them ~ look up lav's need to be buffed but my point was when he said rome did not claim to be a city i assumed he mean that dust 514 was claiming to be a mmo.fps.rpg when he though it was not good enough for that so i used the comparison that farmville a ***** facebook flash game is classified as a mmo to make my point but then the comment rome did not claim to be a empire when it was a shack was made so i assumed he was talking about the trailers and hype around the game so i pointed out EVERY GAME in the history of 2010+ of gaming did that so ccp is allowed to regardless of what he thinks therefore making his point meaningless rome was not built in a day im not calling ccp is rome but im pointing out the nothing that is good will just show up now if you had half a brain you should have figured that out your self unless you still can't what im talking about then obv we are not on the same page and i have nothing left to say to you God! smh... We are talking about how every fanboy of Dust is saying that this game has great gunplay, great vehicles, amazing core mechanics, good economics, good company-customer relations, how Dust 514 tops all other triple A titles and that anybody who can't appreciate how 'good' it is, is ignorant. In reality, Dust is lacking in every aspect outside of future promises by CCP, which no other company has ever had the guts to give such audacious promises. This game cannot compete against the other shooters, at least not yet. Hence it should not call it self a 'city', while it has nothing more to offer than a small 'town'. This , sir, is what we are speaking of.
lol then why are you posting on my post where i say dust is not ready yet but then what was ready in this amount of time >? |
Eris Ernaga
Super Nerds
245
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:18:00 -
[55] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:(why im quoting my self ... i don't know why)
But eve is playable it's not that were all having fun in dust and waiting for the game to improve even more were waiting for dust to become something playable as im sure eve was from the beginning. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
177
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Eris Ernaga wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:(why im quoting my self ... i don't know why) But eve is playable it's not that were all having fun in dust and waiting for the game to improve even more were waiting for dust to become something playable as im sure eve was from the beginning.
you did not play eve. get out and be quite. |
Kekklian Noobatronic
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
91
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:23:00 -
[57] - Quote
Yes it was.
Look it up. It's in the bible. That makes it an irrefutable fact.
|
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
177
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:24:00 -
[58] - Quote
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Yes it was.
Look it up. It's in the bible. That makes it an irrefutable fact.
LoL reported |
Kekklian Noobatronic
Goonfeet Special Planetary Emergency Response Group
91
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:28:00 -
[59] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Yes it was.
Look it up. It's in the bible. That makes it an irrefutable fact.
LoL reported
LoL this isin't WoW or LoL. GL with that. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
177
|
Posted - 2013.06.27 10:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:Kekklian Noobatronic wrote:Yes it was.
Look it up. It's in the bible. That makes it an irrefutable fact.
LoL reported LoL this isin't WoW or LoL. GL with that.
look next to my name
see that flag also look in the forum rules
and then look at the joke about religion you just made that could really offend people |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |