|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
24
   |
Posted - 2013.06.23 09:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
- Add RPG components to the aiming mechanics ( Check )
- Nerf every weapon that is popular in FPS games ( Check )
- Create a huge SP cap, so new players have no chance to enjoy the game ( check )
- Release a closed Beta as an Official Release ( Check )
- Create a Lobby Shooter and then call it a MMOFPS ( Check )
- Create a VIP game mode and restrict the majority of the community from it ( Check )
- Follow a Pay to Win model in a FPS game ( Check )
So far so good CCP, nearly there. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:07:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:- Non-constructive posts
Added one for you.
That is a very constructive post, it shows what you should NOT do. I can add another one ;
- Ban from the Forums everyone that says the truth ( Check ) |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
25
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:12:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sir Petersen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:- Non-constructive posts
Added one for you. That is a very constructive post, it shows what you should NOT do. I can add another one ; - Ban from the Forums everyone that says the truth ( Check ) No dude.. You will get banned for talking nonsense on this forum. Now take your bad attitude somewhere else please.
Nonsense ? and bad attitude ? Where ? .. I add a bonus one just for you ;
- Let Fanboys ruin your community ( Check ) |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
30
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:39:00 -
[4] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:OP, you are just butthurt because CCP is making their game and not yours.
Perhaps you were in early beta or something and think you have some say in how the game will develop... but all of your opinions are just as subjective as mine or anyone elses.
Get over yourself. Like the game. Don't like the game. CCP is not the company that is going to make a pure FPS along the lines of your basement fantasies. Don't blame me. That's something that anyone should be able to see as this game is played within the Eve universe.
That wasn't my idea. That wasn't your idea. We'll have to see if CCP can pull it off. That is their idea (as far as I can tell).
Finally, whining and crying is not constructive. However, if you want to make petty lists and hope for the heavy duty trolling and complaining to appear after the fact -- knock yourself out.
Really ...... You fanboys try to hard  , sit back for a second, analyze the game, think about all the things that could make this game better... then read my post again. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Fine, no point arguing with brainwash fanboys, you right and i'm wrong, happy now ? |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
31
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:53:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sir Petersen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Fine, no point arguing with brainwash fanboys, you right and i'm wrong, happy now ? Stop hating little one and find yourself a new game to play. DUST514 is obviously not the right game for you.
In case you didn't notice, Dust 514 is not the right game for "alot" of people. Lets see how that Fanboy thing goes, when is about 1000 people left in the servers. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
31
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 10:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Fine, no point arguing with brainwash fanboys, you right and i'm wrong, happy now ? No. I'm still waiting to hear your 'solutions'. I too think the game is broken, but saying it's broken & suggesting ways to fix it are two completely different things.
But i have done that ... DON'T follow the "Formula to kill a game"... Of course, maybe CCP is trying to kill the game, then, yes follow the Formula by all means. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 11:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ferren Devarri wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:- Add RPG components to the aiming mechanics ( Check )
- Nerf every weapon that is popular in FPS games ( Check )
- Create a huge SP cap, so new players have no chance to enjoy the game ( check )
- Release a closed Beta as an Official Release ( Check )
- Create a Lobby Shooter and then call it a MMOFPS ( Check )
- Create a VIP game mode and restrict the majority of the community from it ( Check )
- Follow a Pay to Win model in a FPS game ( Check )
So far so good CCP, nearly there. - Follow a Pay to Win model in a FPS game ( Check )- Release a closed Beta as an Official Release ( Check )
- Create a Lobby Shooter and then call it a MMOFPS ( Check )These lines are the rookie mistakes that has bit DUST in its ass, and will continue to do so with a half-assed game with little developer interest besides short term gains from those people so desperate for an 'edge' that they're willing to pour hundreds of dollars into a dead end product. The rest are subjective evaluations, as you can have an RPG and skill system in any game, as long as it's implimented properly.
"Add RPG components to the aiming mechanics" I think you got that one wrong. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 11:15:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Ferren Devarri wrote:Crash Monster wrote:
Hey, OP, look... someone who can actually make a decent post on the subject... though we can argue whether we agree with the items selected.
- Most people feel that we don't have a P2W model, but it's something to keep an eye on.
- The release has issues that need fixing, pretty much universally agreed.
- At the moment we don't really have MMOFPS in the game.
CCP has a bad history of scam shops for those who care to look up $70 monocles on google and see what they come up with. The fact that they allow players to buy prototype-grade equipment that can cut out months or years of active play and passive gains is, in effect, pay-2-win. It's got the interesting side effect of being a diminishing return now that people are already in proto-gear, but it still gives payers an edge over non-payers. My AUR proto suit is no different than my ISK proto suit. Personally, I don't see it as 'pay to win' but more 'pay to save time'. In my opinion, pay to win would be the ability to buy a weapon that clearly outclasses any ISK variant. Aside from the Fused Locus (which, in question, should be removed entirely), I don't see it.
Yeah because SP boosters are clearly not P2W, specially with the HUGE SP cap. |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 11:26:00 -
[10] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:I assume you mean SP gap?
No, I don't believe boosters are pay to win. You can acquire SP without the use of boosters, it just takes more time.
As stated in my previous post, 'pay to save time'. It's a different concept than pay to win. Maybe we should nerf players who have been playing longer, to effectively nullify the SP gap? No, that's ridiculous.
I agree that the gap is a hinderence to new players, if they exist, but altering boosters isn't the solution. Matchmaking is.
"Pay to save time" is the excuse CCP is using for this "Pay to Win" model. Don't be so blind... please. |
|
|
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
37
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 11:33:00 -
[11] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:I assume you mean SP gap?
No, I don't believe boosters are pay to win. You can acquire SP without the use of boosters, it just takes more time.
As stated in my previous post, 'pay to save time'. It's a different concept than pay to win. Maybe we should nerf players who have been playing longer, to effectively nullify the SP gap? No, that's ridiculous.
I agree that the gap is a hinderence to new players, if they exist, but altering boosters isn't the solution. Matchmaking is. "Pay to save time" is the excuse CCP is using for this "Pay to Win" model. Don't be so blind... please. No. I once played a game that offered an item that increased attack power by 60%, for cash. Without paying cash you could only get a 20% increase. That is pay to win. To revert back to my previous comment, would an ISK version of boosters help the issue? However, I don't see how it would be implemented effectively without making the AUR version better. Otherwise, there would be no need to support the development of the game via AUR.
Will you be happy if CCP does a full SP reset ? and if not, why ? Obviously that will level the gap, but alot of people is against it. Why is that ? |
Banning Hammer
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
37
|
Posted - 2013.06.23 11:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Banning Hammer wrote:Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:I assume you mean SP gap?
No, I don't believe boosters are pay to win. You can acquire SP without the use of boosters, it just takes more time.
As stated in my previous post, 'pay to save time'. It's a different concept than pay to win. Maybe we should nerf players who have been playing longer, to effectively nullify the SP gap? No, that's ridiculous.
I agree that the gap is a hinderence to new players, if they exist, but altering boosters isn't the solution. Matchmaking is. "Pay to save time" is the excuse CCP is using for this "Pay to Win" model. Don't be so blind... please. No. I once played a game that offered an item that increased attack power by 60%, for cash. Without paying cash you could only get a 20% increase. That is pay to win. To revert back to my previous comment, would an ISK version of boosters help the issue? However, I don't see how it would be implemented effectively without making the AUR version better. Otherwise, there would be no need to support the development of the game via AUR. Will you be happy if CCP does a full SP reset ? and if not, why ? Obviously that will level the gap, but alot of people is against it. Why is that ? I can't say I would be happy to see all my hard earned SP disappear, but if it were to breathe new life into the game, personally, I would give it the thumbs up. I play the game for the game and the people, not for my investment of time and money .
I fixed that for you.  |
|
|
| |
|